at this point.
Does anyone know how to resolve RLOAD REQ on these?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
On Sat, 16 Dec 2023 at 18:38, Charles Sprickman via cisco-nsp
wrote:
> > There are hundreds of GRE tunnels.
>
> I have nothing to offer, and I'm mostly out of the ISP game, but I am so
> curious what the use-case is here, especially the "BGP to each CPE". I
> unde
> On Dec 16, 2023, at 4:16 AM, Dragan Jovicic via cisco-nsp
> wrote:
>
> Greeting,
> We have a somewhat unusual scenario with thousands of CPE devices each
> using cellular interface and gre tunnel to connect to hub router, currently
> ASR 1001x.
> The hub router de
Hi,
That's great, because we had the same chassis in mind.
The peculiarity comes from the way CPEs are configured, routing, NAT
between vrfs, one tunnel limit per CPE, and some other things.
Anyway, awesome - thank you.
BR
On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 10:35 AM Tarko Tikan via cisco-nsp <
cisco-
connected to mpls core network. There
are hundreds of GRE tunnels.
Not really so unusual in SP environment.
What would be logical replacement for hub router considering
expansion and redundancy. We tried a pair of stacked Cisco 9500, and
it performed worse than expected.
cat8500 family (non-L
connected to mpls
core network.
There are hundreds of GRE tunnels.
What would be logical replacement for hub router considering expansion and
redundancy.
We tried a pair of stacked Cisco 9500, and it performed worse than expected.
One solution we have is another router with same addressing scheme
nted. ;>
I know you know this, just stating it for the record. Concur 100% otherwise, of
course.
Roland Dobbins
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/l
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 09:00:58AM +, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
> On Dec 6, 2023, at 04:45, Gert Doering via cisco-nsp
> wrote:
>
> > deny ipv4 any any fragments
>
> This is approach is generally contraindicated, as it tends to break EDNS0, &
> DNSS
On Dec 6, 2023, at 04:45, Gert Doering via cisco-nsp
wrote:
deny ipv4 any any fragments
This is approach is generally contraindicated, as it tends to break EDNS0, &
DNSSEC along with it.
If the target is a broadband access network, you can use flow telemetry to
measure normal rates of
XR syntax for fragment blocking is
deny ipv4 any any fragments
gert
To both D'Wayne and Gert - thx!
Regards,
Hank
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 11:27:21PM +0200, Hank Nussbacher via cisco-nsp wrote:
> We encountered something strange. We run IOS-XR 7.5.2 on ASR9K platform.
>
> Had a user under udp/0 attack. Tried to block it via standard ACL:
>
>
> ipv4 access-list block-zero
> 20
cs/ip/generic-routing-encapsulation-gre/8014-acl-wp.html>
D’Wayne Saunders
On 6 Dec 2023, at 08:27, Hank Nussbacher via cisco-nsp
wrote:
[External Email] This email was sent from outside the organisation – be
cautious, particularly with links and attachments.
We encountered something strange. We r
block-zero ingress
ipv4 access-group block-zero egress
Yet, based on Kentik, we had no effect and the udp/0 attack just
continued - as if the Cisco ACL is totally ignored. Or am I missing
something in the ACL listed above?
Thanks,
Hank
___
cisco-nsp
Are you running BFD on the link as well?
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 8:33 AM Drew Weaver via cisco-nsp <
cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> wrote:
> Can you point me towards a hint on how you implement import/export filters
> in OSPF on IOS XR?
>
> Are you referring to 'distribute lists'?
immediately.
It seems like it takes 15-20 seconds for the route to be removed entirely from
OSPF from when the transport goes down.
Thanks,
-Drew
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of Mark Tinka via
cisco-nsp
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2023 10:34 AM
To: cisco-nsp
On 11/28/23 17:02, Nick Hilliard via cisco-nsp wrote:
prefix filtering is a defining feature of a policy routing protocol.
OSPF is a link-state protocol, and doesn't support the concept of
having different visibility of prefixes inside the same area. If you
want that with OSPF, you'll
Drew Weaver via cisco-nsp wrote on 15/11/2023 17:43:
Is there a way to prevent that IP address from being seen at all by the IOS XR
routers?
prefix filtering is a defining feature of a policy routing protocol.
OSPF is a link-state protocol, and doesn't support the concept of having
Hi
i have a question:
I have a cisco Router for L2TP/PPP
I receive a radius requete from my supplier:
rad_recv: Access-Request packet from host xxx port 33696, id=30, length=333
Called-Station-Id = "dataverizon"
Calling-Station-Id = ""
User-Password = "12345
not to
time out as quickly as they should be.
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
-Drew
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
-OS_Programmability_Guide_7x/NX_API.html#id_92103
Has anyone seen a similar guide for IPv6 anywhere?
I am assuming that this works but with Cisco having documentation is better.
ip netns exec management ip6tables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 443 -j DROP
Do you just follow the same instructions
On Mon, 2 Oct 2023 at 13:22, Dobbins, Roland via cisco-nsp
wrote:
> cache timeout inactive 15
> Kentik recommends 15s:
>
> This is an old, out-of-date recommendation from Cisco should be retired.
>
> 5s is plenty of time for inactive flows.
What is the basis for this recommen
On 2 Oct 2023, at 17:10, Hank Nussbacher
mailto:h...@interall.co.il>> wrote:
cache timeout inactive 15
Kentik recommends 15s:
This is an old, out-of-date recommendation from Cisco should be retired.
5s is plenty of time for inactive
,
and that the SNMP polling/analysis system is configured with those values.
We have set:
cache timeout inactive 15
Kentik recommends 15s:
https://github.com/kentik/config-snippets/blob/master/Cisco/IOS-XR/netflow-9.conf
but I will try 5s based on your feedback.
Regards,
Hank
On Mon, 2 Oct 2023 at 09:14, Hank Nussbacher via cisco-nsp
wrote:
> Does this make sense to go 1:1 which will only increase the number of
> Netflow record to export? Everyone that does 1:1000 or 1:1
> sampling, do you also seen a discrepancy between Netflow stats vs SNMP
> st
On 2 Oct 2023, at 13:13, Hank Nussbacher via cisco-nsp
mailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>> wrote:
Does this make sense to go 1:1 which will only increase the number of Netflow
record to export? Everyone that does 1:1000 or 1:1 sampling, do you also
seen a discrepancy between N
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 09:13:55AM +0300, Hank Nussbacher via cisco-nsp wrote:
> When comparing traffic stats with SNMP, Netflow stats always appear too low
> (see attachment).
>
> Opened a TAC case and their recommendation is to do 1:1 and I quote:
>
> "Irrespecti
nks,
Hank
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
On 9/28/23 09:10, Mohammad Khalil via cisco-nsp wrote:
Greetings
I am looking for similar command to obtain forwarding information at the
midpoint (no te interfaces)
https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/junos/mpls/topics/ref/command/show-mpls-lsp.html
This is on NCS5500
.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
.
As with IOS XR, a lot of them seem nice-to-have, for us anyway, in the
context of where the Internet is today.
I’m a Juniper guy mostly, but, RPL is pretty good I’ve got to admit.
I think it's a bit over-the-top, but that's just me :-).
--
Nathan Ward
[1] I have forgotten what Cisco calls
L, I think that’s a fair trade.
I’m a Juniper guy mostly, but, RPL is pretty good I’ve got to admit.
--
Nathan Ward
[1] I have forgotten what Cisco calls constrained route distribution.
rtfilter is a JunOS term and is what I call it. From memory vendors all
call it different things.
___
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 08:48:44AM +0800, Barry Greene via cisco-nsp wrote:
> Q. Is anyone deploying TCP Authentication Option (TCP-AO) on their BGP
> peering Sessions?
Not me. Not sure if my vendors do support it (IOS XR and Arista EOS),
but I do not see significant benefit.
TBH
behind the scenes.
I have seen this catch out folks in the past, who either expected it
to pre-filter like Cisco, or expected it to permit RTs additional to
the policy.
Agreed - the Juniper option makes more sense to me, even though I first
interacted with VRF's in IOS.
Cisco have always
. The Vendors are not supporting yet. Which means a lot of older systems would
not be able to support a BGP session with TCP-AO.
2. People have to tried is operationally.
Sharing you thoughts would be helpful …...
Thanks,
Barry
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco
On 24/09/2023 at 4:18:23 AM, Mark Tinka via cisco-nsp <
cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> wrote:
> This is different from how Junos does it, where import/export maps can
> be used without having to explicitly define the RT in the VRF.
>
Further than that, in JunOS if you define
for it work further down the core.
Am I doing something wrong, or is this a bug?
System is an ASR1002-X running IOS XE 17.03.04a.
For completeness, doing this on Junos works flawlessly.
All help appreciated. Thanks.
Mark.
___
cisco-nsp mai
something wrong, or is this a bug?
System is an ASR1002-X running IOS XE 17.03.04a.
For completeness, doing this on Junos works flawlessly.
All help appreciated. Thanks.
Mark.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net
;bgp additional-paths install" features.
However, neither "bgp additional-paths send receive" nor "advertise
additional-paths" are supported, making it a fractured and not very
useful feature.
Mark.
_______
cisco-nsp maili
On 9/10/23 21:22, Mohammad Khalil via cisco-nsp wrote:
Greetings
Hope all is well.
I need to check if Juniper's BGP extended community settings are compatible
with Cisco's BGP extended community settings.
Is it possible to intercommunicate Juniper's BGP extended community with Cisco
BGP
Greetings
Hope all is well.
I need to check if Juniper's BGP extended community settings are compatible
with Cisco's BGP extended community settings.
Is it possible to intercommunicate Juniper's BGP extended community with Cisco
BGP extended community ?
Defining BGP Extended Communities for Use
.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
. If you have one pointing somewhere else, then it will. Some
Junos platforms won't do this either BTW, it's somewhat dependent on the
forwarding hardware.
ABF works but it's more similar to using filter based forwarding in Junos.
Thanks,
Phil
On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 12:43 PM Mark Tinka via cisco
On 8/30/23 18:14, Mark Tinka via cisco-nsp wrote:
Hi all.
Does anyone have any definitive info per subject?
We don't see support in our CSR1000v units, and my SE seems to have
gone fishing.
Anyone who has deployed Cat8000v know if there is support there? It's
what we are moving
is a workaround, but...
Mark.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
.
One could probably find out, with enough energy, but I've given up on
IOS XR... also because BGP Add-Paths setup in IOS XR is unnecessarily
complicated if you compare it to IOS XE.
Mark.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 02:28:53PM +0200, Mark Tinka via cisco-nsp wrote:
> So yes, our default routes point to Null0. I changed that to something
> useful and it still didn't work. It's almost as if the traffic exiting the
> VRF toward the global table wanted to follow a label swit
too late to test now. The box has been
swapped out.
But this is a good tip. I'll ask the next person who runs into this to
update this post with their experience.
Mark.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailma
.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Would something like this work?
https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/s/question/0D53i0KstGrCAJ/ios-xr-leaking-the-routes-between-vrf-and-global-rib
On Tue, Aug 29, 2023, 7:49 AM Mark Tinka via cisco-nsp <
cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I've been racking
On 29/08/2023 at 6:48:32 PM, Mark Tinka via cisco-nsp <
cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I've been racking my brain trying to implement an equivalent feature in
> IOS XR 6.7.1 similar to Junos' "next-table" feature.
>
> Essentially, I am trying
n existing router. But we don't use that
feature too often because it impacts ultimate PFE performance in a way
that a regular "vrf" routing instance does not.
Mark.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.
Would this be a case where vasi-left and vasi-right interfaces are appropriate?
Essentially same as an LT in Junos.
Not as elegant for sure, but should function.
Cheers,
Fraser
> On 29 Aug 2023, at 4:48 pm, Mark Tinka via cisco-nsp
> wrote:
>
> Hi all.
>
> I've been racki
me up with a working
solution, or is IOS XR just deficient in this regard? I don't understand
the point of being able to point default to the global table in a VRF,
and then not be able to actually use it. Thanks.
Mark.
_______
cisco-nsp mailing list c
Turns out we had a bad backplane ... ended up replacing the chassis. All
the LCs were fine.
Thanks to everyone who responded on- and off-list!
On 6/5/23 16:34, Tom Hill wrote:
On 2023-06-01 21:38, Bryan Holloway via cisco-nsp wrote:
https://community.cisco.com/t5/xr-os-and-platforms
On 9/9/22 11:06, Sebastian Neuner via cisco-nsp wrote:
Hi all,
I got no replies and that might be because nobody cares, or it might
be because nobody knows how to do it on XR. Googling for something and
finding posts without solution is always annoying, so here's what I
found
hange.
And why is the documentation for those products of the last few years
in general such a catastrophe?
I'm guessing most people don't use Add-Paths as much as they do
Multipath, so perhaps why.
Mark.
_______
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.ne
same provider that supports
both of IGMP join and PIM. This source comes via single 1Gbps optical L2 port
to our 7600 RSP720-3C-GE core router, the port load is 357Mbps at max.
We also use several Cisco 7201 routers connected to the same vlan as PIM routers
and Multicast Service Reflectors. Each
unobservable to you.
On Sun, 11 Jun 2023 at 13:31, james list wrote:
>
> Hi
> I've deactivated the FAST on Juniper but nothing changes...
>
> As I wrote on Cisco remains down hence you will not see any LACP while on
> Juniper it flaps, once I shut on cisco it stop to f
Hi
I've deactivated the FAST on Juniper but nothing changes...
As I wrote on Cisco remains down hence you will not see any LACP while on
Juniper it flaps, once I shut on cisco it stop to flap
I'm not sure it is a cabling issue...
we should try to setup a pure L3 p2p link and test that I guess
, 11 Jun 2023 at 10:38, james list via cisco-nsp
wrote:
>
> Dear expert
> we've an issue in setting up a port-channel between a Juniper EX4400 and a
> Cisco Nexus N9K-C93180YC-EX over an SX 1 Gbs link.
>
> We've implemented the following configuration but on Juniper side it is
&g
Dear expert
we've an issue in setting up a port-channel between a Juniper EX4400 and a
Cisco Nexus N9K-C93180YC-EX over an SX 1 Gbs link.
We've implemented the following configuration but on Juniper side it is
interface flapping while on Cisco side it remains down.
Light levels seem ok.
Has
in the right direction?
The next stop would be to open a TAC case of course.
Thanks!
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
On 2023-06-01 21:38, Bryan Holloway via cisco-nsp wrote:
https://community.cisco.com/t5/xr-os-and-platforms/problems-with-a99-8x100ge-tr-and-ios-xr-6-5-3/td-p/4013668
This chassis has been up and churning packets for several years, so it
was presumed to be a possible hardware fail.
We acquired
RSP880s, same chassis (9904). Sound familiar?
Anybody else seen this?
Thank you all ... !!
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
ASR920 or NCS540?
/Tes
Sent from my Phone
> On 31 May 2023, at 22:42, harbor235 via cisco-nsp
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Looking for a Cisco CPE that can do up to 2Gbps, basic routing nothing
> fancy.
>
> 4451 w/2Gbps license and 2xSM-X's could do the trick
Hi all,
Looking for a Cisco CPE that can do up to 2Gbps, basic routing nothing
fancy.
4451 w/2Gbps license and 2xSM-X's could do the trick, thoughts, better
choice?
Needs to be Cisco , eng group is finicky
Mike
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp
oincidence, but these seems like a direct line from problem to
resolution.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Hammett via cisco-nsp"
To: "Cisco Network Service Providers"
On 2023-04-29 14:47, Richard Clayton via cisco-nsp wrote:
Hi Guys
s/Guys/everyone/g
archive
path scp://
user:password@1.2.3.4/CUSTOMERS/CUSTOMER1/CUSTOMER-LONDON6-ETH1.cfg
write-memory
time-period 10080
Because the password part of the SCP config is not an IOS recognised
password I don't
w.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp ] [
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg ]
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Hammett via cisco-nsp"
To: "Cisco Network Service Providers"
Sent: Monday, April 3, 2023 12:16:52 AM
Subject: [c-nsp] Cisco Nexus 3k Route Selection\Pa
to encrypt it. If that's the case is
there a secure fudge, like somehow referencing a local username that does
have password encryption.
I'm not looking for server based solutions like SolarWinds etc.
Thanks
Rick
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp
I'm fairly new to Cisco routing. I've been using Cisco switching for a few
years, but gaps in knowledge aren't apparent when the only layer 3 access to
the equipment is internal. I've been using Mikrotik and Linux routing for a
very long time.
Does Cisco (particularly the Nexus line
.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Hammett via cisco-nsp"
To: "Cisco Network Service Providers"
Sent: Monday, April 3, 2023 12:16:52 AM
Subject: [c-nsp]
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023, Mike Hammett via cisco-nsp wrote:
We have a Nexus 3064 that is setup with partial BGP tables and is routing based
on that.
I've done a show ip bgp for an IP of interest and it has an expected next hop
IP. I show ip arp on that next hop IP and it has the expected
The snmp if index reported by the Nexus matches the if index in ElastiFlow.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Raymond Burkholder via cisco-nsp"
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether
.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Raymond Burkholder via cisco-nsp"
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Monday, April 3, 2023 12:31:59 AM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Nexus 3k Route Select
What started this investigation was a client complained of traffic coming from
another upstream instead of our direct connection.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Hammett via
On 4/2/23 23:16, Mike Hammett via cisco-nsp wrote:
We have a Nexus 3064 that is setup with partial BGP tables and is routing based
on that.
I've done a show ip bgp for an IP of interest and it has an expected next hop
IP. I show ip arp on that next hop IP and it has the expected interface
Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Hi Everyone,
Posting this as it made for quite an interesting debug, and am hoping to save
someone some future grief.
When using ASR 1ks and ios XE Amsterdam 17.3.6 we encountered an issue related
to pppoe users and radius attributes.
We saw issues trying to send cisco AV pair ip:outacl
rface, it is enabled for both ingress and
egress. You cannot enable sFlow for only ingress or only egress."
Hasn't Cisco fixed this yet?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
___
Thanks Saku and Gert for the kind replies , well received.
From: cisco-nsp on behalf of Gert Doering
via cisco-nsp
Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2023 9:58 PM
To: Saku Ytti
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] BGP Routes
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 12, 2023 at 08
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 12, 2023 at 08:51:36PM +0200, Saku Ytti via cisco-nsp wrote:
> You might want add-path or best-external for predictability and
> improved convergence time.
Last time we did best-external with ASR9k it only worked in a useful
way if you are using labeled-unicast. That wa
On Sun, 12 Mar 2023 at 20:50, Mark Tinka via cisco-nsp
wrote:
> ASR9K1 has more routes with better paths toward destinations via its
> upstream than ASR9K2 does.
Or at worst, race.
You might want add-path or best-external for predictability and
improved convergence time.
--
Thanks for the hint , actually this is what I have been thinking of but was
wondering how can I get more details or samples about that as a matter of proof.
From: cisco-nsp on behalf of Mark Tinka via
cisco-nsp
Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2023 9:49 PM
To: cisco-nsp
On 3/12/23 20:21, Mohammad Khalil via cisco-nsp wrote:
Greetings
I have two ASR9K connected to different providers (Uplinks).
I am receiving around 90K routes from each provider , as well , I have iBGP
between the ASR9K.
What am noticing is that ASR9K1 is advertising around 87K to ASR9K2
On Sun, 12 Mar 2023, 18:22 Mohammad Khalil via cisco-nsp, <
cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> wrote:
> Greetings
> I have two ASR9K connected to different providers (Uplinks).
> I am receiving around 90K routes from each provider , as well , I have
> iBGP between the ASR9K.
?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
to be compassionate today
On Thursday, February 23, 2023 at 11:35:35 AM PST, Phil Bedard via
cisco-nsp wrote:
The original question was around an Internet border router with 10G support.
We have devices like the 55A2-MOD-SE which is similar to some other vendor
devices (somewhat of a reference
ery for me. There are
packages for 4,8,16,32 and 64 thousand subscribers. They are not very
expensive compared to the price of hardware.
Hope this is helpful for OP.
Kind regards,
Andrey
Mark Tinka via cisco-nsp писал(а) 2023-02-24 13:18:
On 2/24/23 19:51, Lukas Tribus via cisco-nsp wrote:
Hello,
for the u
l get that an execute it. That script can
then do whatever you want, i.e. download an image file, a config file, and run
the commands to apply/install the image and apply the config.
Cheers,
James.
___________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
htt
--
tarko
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
--- Original Message ---
On Wednesday, March 1st, 2023 at 09:43, Tarko Tikan via cisco-nsp
wrote:
> > My long-term solution to this problem is to install with iPXE. That lets
> > you do it via HTTP and without all the nonsense :)
>
>
> Unfortunately this is
cess-group nf_ex_ing
Where in the page was defined nf_ex_ing? I thought it was nf_ex.
The only Cisco doc I found that discusses "option filtered" is:
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/asr9000/software/asr9k-r6-5/netflow/configuration/guide/b-netflow-cg-asr9k-65x/b-netflow-cg-asr9k-
I thought it was |||nf_ex|.
The only Cisco doc I found that discusses "option filtered" is:
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/asr9000/software/asr9k-r6-5/netflow/configuration/guide/b-netflow-cg-asr9k-65x/b-netflow-cg-asr9k-65x_chapter_010.html
Any clue apprec
On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 6:52 AM Simon Leinen via cisco-nsp <
cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> wrote:
> Gert Doering writes:
> > On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 08:14:30AM +0300, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> >> Indeed the SNMP leaks appear to be exactly CSCtw74132 which we did
> >>
not necessarily something I
would advocate.
Thanks,
Phil
From: cisco-nsp on behalf of Tarko Tikan
via cisco-nsp
Date: Wednesday, March 1, 2023 at 3:56 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] NCS IOS-XR rant (was:Re: Internet border router
recommendations and experiences)
hey
upgrades you want all your devices end up in same state and GISO
provides that. When doing investigation you don't have to go and compare
specific RPM versions that someone might have installed etc.
--
tarko
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp
.
--
tarko
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
then.
Mark.
_______
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
101 - 200 of 1125 matches
Mail list logo
