Or the way nexus does it - E for everything, best of all.
From: cisco-nsp On Behalf Of Gehring Kai
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2020 6:41 AM
To: Tom Hill ; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 10/25 interface behavior
This message originates from outside of your organisation.
At least
At least on the Catalyst 9000 series it looks like they switched to always
using the highest bandwidth that would potentially be available on that
interface... just checked on a 9200L and a 9500-16X: The interface name is
always TenGigabitEthernet, even if you use 1Gbit SFPs in them.
Much bette
On 28/01/2020 14:49, Nathan Lannine wrote:
> Gigabit or TenGigabit based on the configuration. However, both
> types of interfaces always exist logically, they just don't get used
> until you configure/use the physical port one way or the other.
Yes, this is the Catalyst/IOS method -- which I don
>
>
> Is this the norm for the Cisco 10/25 switches as well? I don't have any to
> test with at the moment.
>
> Cisco 3850's have some 1/10 uplink module ports that are identified as
Gigabit or TenGigabit based on the configuration. However, both types of
interfaces always exist logically, they ju
Hello,
I was recently dealing with some Dell OS10 Enterprise switches that have 10/25
SFP28 interfaces.
When you change the configuration of a group of 4 ports from 25G to 10G the
interface names all change from ethernet1/1/1 to ethernet1/1/1:1 for no real
reason whatsoever.
I understand that
