Re: [c-nsp] 7204VXR reboots

2013-06-10 Thread Mark Tinka
On Sunday, June 09, 2013 06:45:57 PM Frank Bulk wrote: I don't believe there is a version of 12.2SR for the 7200's that supports both DHCPv6-PD static route insertion AND IPv6 PBR. According to FN (which should always be used with caution), both of these are supported on SR* for the NPE-G2

Re: [c-nsp] 7204VXR reboots

2013-06-09 Thread Frank Bulk
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7204VXR reboots On Friday, June 07, 2013 10:30:38 PM Gert Doering wrote: Yeah, true. But my experience with 12.2SR on 7200s has not been very good overall,... What kinds of problems did you have? I've been running it since 2010 (which

Re: [c-nsp] 7204VXR reboots

2013-06-08 Thread Mark Tinka
On Friday, June 07, 2013 10:30:38 PM Gert Doering wrote: Yeah, true. But my experience with 12.2SR on 7200s has not been very good overall,... What kinds of problems did you have? I've been running it since 2010 (which was the only/best way to harmonize code between the NPE-G2/7201 and

Re: [c-nsp] 7204VXR reboots

2013-06-08 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Sat, Jun 08, 2013 at 12:26:44PM +0200, Mark Tinka wrote: and given that there is 15.0M, I have always questioned what use it is to have support for *one* software platform in a special-case IOS train, maintained by the BU inside Cisco that caused the most annoyance of all of them

Re: [c-nsp] 7204VXR reboots

2013-06-08 Thread Saku Ytti
On (2013-06-08 14:18 +0200), Gert Doering wrote: platforms. And, as you have mentioned, SRC was full of shit, so why even bother with SR* if I can have 12.4M/15.0M, which is *way* less buggy. This is anecdotal and not very useful to anyone. And having data is hard (even if you're Cisco). I

Re: [c-nsp] 7204VXR reboots

2013-06-08 Thread Sidney Boumendil
Hi Gert, On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de wrote: Now, I would have strongly liked to have the hardware-independent bits of IOS to be the same across all platforms, abstracting the hardware side well enough that features like 32 bit AS support arrive on all

Re: [c-nsp] 7204VXR reboots

2013-06-08 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Sat, Jun 08, 2013 at 02:50:49PM +0200, Sidney Boumendil wrote: This is the promise of IOS 15.0 which comes with what Cisco calls IOS componentization. The same code for example for multicast support should offer predictable behaviour on all hardware platform. Until there, deploying a

Re: [c-nsp] 7204VXR reboots

2013-06-08 Thread Sidney Boumendil
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de wrote: So how is this working? 15.0M already has all the niceness, and the hardware BUs are not picking it up? From the feature lists and such, AFAIK, only Cat 6k, 4k, 3k, ISR series as well as ASR1k are concerned...

Re: [c-nsp] 7204VXR reboots

2013-06-08 Thread Mark Tinka
On Saturday, June 08, 2013 02:18:32 PM Gert Doering wrote: And, as you have mentioned, SRC was full of shit, so why even bother with SR* if I can have 12.4M/15.0M, which is *way* less buggy. Agree - but as Saku mentioned, it was the best code for the 7200 (and I think, the 7600) at the

Re: [c-nsp] 7204VXR reboots

2013-06-08 Thread Mark Tinka
On Saturday, June 08, 2013 03:16:25 PM Sidney Boumendil wrote: AFAIK, only Cat 6k, 4k, 3k, ISR series as well as ASR1k are concerned... Right, that's what I know also. Cheers, Mark. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [c-nsp] 7204VXR reboots

2013-06-07 Thread Mark Tinka
On Friday, January 11, 2013 09:07:47 PM Gert Doering wrote: All these IOS versions are ancient. 12.4(latest)-with-no-letters, or 15.0(latest)M would be my recommendation. 12.2SR is still maintained on the 7200-VXR platform. As of March 2013, 12.2(33)SRE8 was released. Fair point, there

Re: [c-nsp] 7204VXR reboots

2013-06-07 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 03:17:54PM +0200, Mark Tinka wrote: On Friday, January 11, 2013 09:07:47 PM Gert Doering wrote: All these IOS versions are ancient. 12.4(latest)-with-no-letters, or 15.0(latest)M would be my recommendation. 12.2SR is still maintained on the 7200-VXR

Re: [c-nsp] 7204VXR reboots

2013-01-23 Thread Joe Maimon
Joe Pruett wrote: 3. not really 12 vs 15, but i have never really been able to figure out what the 'service provider' or 'sp services' feature set really means. mpls seems to be only in the sp side, but lots of other features are removed from sp compared to my ipsec variant. i guess by

Re: [c-nsp] 7204VXR reboots

2013-01-23 Thread Reuben Farrelly
On 24/01/2013 1:29 AM, Joe Maimon wrote: One thing thats really biting me atm is that per-user aaa/qos support, available in 124 mainline seems to have moved only to S train for 15x, leaving me (again) with the interesting dilemma of which features on which routers I want to continue using or

Re: [c-nsp] 7204VXR reboots

2013-01-22 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 01:10:51PM -0800, Joe Pruett wrote: i have a general question about the 12.x vs 15.x versions. i have been running 12.4.25 on my 7206 vxr boxes and have been thinking of trying the 15.x stuff. there are a couple things that i haven't been able to figure out. 1.

Re: [c-nsp] 7204VXR reboots

2013-01-22 Thread Reuben Farrelly
On 22/01/2013 9:59 PM, Gert Doering wrote: Nobody knows what's inside any given IOS build. As a rule of thumb, whenever you want to turn on something new, the specific combination of hardware + software + feature pack that you have will not support it. (Yes, this does annoy me to no end)

Re: [c-nsp] 7204VXR reboots

2013-01-21 Thread Joe Pruett
On 01/12/2013 12:23 PM, Gert Doering wrote: Hi, On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 12:14:51AM +0200, Dumitru Ciobarcianu wrote: You might want to upgrade the IOS, the safest bet for you (I don't know what your exact requirements are) would be one from the same train, for example 12.4.(24)T8. Never

Re: [c-nsp] 7204VXR reboots

2013-01-12 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 12:14:51AM +0200, Dumitru Ciobarcianu wrote: You might want to upgrade the IOS, the safest bet for you (I don't know what your exact requirements are) would be one from the same train, for example 12.4.(24)T8. Never ever recommend a T train image if a newer

[c-nsp] 7204VXR reboots

2013-01-11 Thread Adam Greene
We have a 7204VXR / NPE-G1 with 1GB RAM running 12.4(15)T5 which is rebooting by itself every 4-5 days. About 11 BGP peers, 4 GRE tunnels, 4 interfaces in use plus a T1, pushing about 100Mbps traffic. We've failed over to an identical standby router, all the same specs, and the same thing

Re: [c-nsp] 7204VXR reboots

2013-01-11 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 02:20:33PM -0500, Adam Greene wrote: Thinking of putting 12.2(40) on the router, which has been running fine in a separate environment on a 7206VXR/NPE400. Cisco states that 12.2(4)BW or 12.2(8)B or later are required for an NPE-G1. Not sure what the B means.

Re: [c-nsp] 7204VXR reboots

2013-01-11 Thread Adam Greene
Thanks Gert. Wish I knew what was causing issue. But IOS upgrade will be good first step. I appreciate it. On 1/11/2013 2:07 PM, Gert Doering wrote: Hi, On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 02:20:33PM -0500, Adam Greene wrote: Thinking of putting 12.2(40) on the router, which has been running fine in a

Re: [c-nsp] 7204VXR reboots

2013-01-11 Thread Chuck Church
To: Gert Doering Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7204VXR reboots Thanks Gert. Wish I knew what was causing issue. But IOS upgrade will be good first step. I appreciate it. On 1/11/2013 2:07 PM, Gert Doering wrote: Hi, On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 02:20:33PM -0500, Adam Greene wrote

Re: [c-nsp] 7204VXR reboots

2013-01-11 Thread Dumitru Ciobarcianu
On 11-Jan-13 9:20 PM, Adam Greene wrote: We have a 7204VXR / NPE-G1 with 1GB RAM running 12.4(15)T5 which is rebooting by itself every 4-5 days. Most likely a memory leak somewhere. Looking trough Bug Search Tool 12.4(15)T5 has a lng list... And since we are talking about an image from