Re: [c-nsp] 7606 RSP720

2013-05-01 Thread Sharlon Carty
for any damages or errors or omissions in the contents of this message and which arise as a result of this e-mail. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net on behalf of Walter Keen Sent: Wed 3/3/2010 6:28 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7606 RSP720

Re: [c-nsp] 7606 RSP720

2010-03-15 Thread Sharlon Carty
- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Kevin Loch Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 6:57 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7606 RSP720 Sharlon Carty wrote: Hello, I have a police-map applied to a vlan

[c-nsp] 7606 RSP720

2010-03-03 Thread Sharlon Carty
Hello, I have a police-map applied to a vlan interface set to 10mbit. Works fine, as long as traffic is routed on the CEF720 48 port module. But the moment traffic is routed on the RSP720, traffic is above the 10mbit. Is there something on the RSP720 that needs to enabled? Here is my

Re: [c-nsp] 7606 RSP720

2010-03-03 Thread Kevin Loch
Sharlon Carty wrote: Hello, I have a police-map applied to a vlan interface set to 10mbit. Works fine, as long as traffic is routed on the CEF720 48 port module. But the moment traffic is routed on the RSP720, traffic is above the 10mbit. Is there something on the RSP720 that needs to

Re: [c-nsp] 7606 RSP720

2010-03-03 Thread Walter Keen
We had a similar situation with rsp720's and sup720's, and under each l3 vlan interface, had to add 'mls qos bridged' for the rate-limiting to work as expected, as well as the other mls commands you have configured on the trunk port in your example below On 03/03/2010 01:43 PM, Sharlon Carty