According to the below link, it's not quite as simple as the Cisco OSPF
Design Guide writes:
http://blog.ine.com/2011/04/04/understanding-ospf-external-route-path-selection/
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
We are looking for pros/cons of doing so.
Just to mention several aspects:
-with adding CEs into your MPLS cloud you're going to increase the number of
routes IGP has to carry.
-you mentioned the CE is in customer premises dependent on their environment
variables that can eventually contribute
On (2013-03-05 09:58 +0100), Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
-with adding CEs into your MPLS cloud you're going to increase the number of
routes IGP has to carry.
Unless you run OptB
Security is the main concern
I don't know about this one.
How plausible is that customer will replace your device
Adam Vitkovsky adam.vitkov...@swan.sk writes:
How plausible is that customer will replace your device with theirs without
you noticing it + they crack all the passwords so they can run ISIS, LDP and
BGP sessions with you.
They don't need to do that. Just put a switch between the CE and the
On (2013-03-05 11:06 +0100), Benny Amorsen wrote:
Maybe one day we will get either strict MPLS label checks or L2
encryption and authentication. At that point the only attacks are to the
CE itself. I am not holding my breath.
You need lung capacity of just weeks. Next IOS-XR release will
There are a number of solutions like using BGP labeled unicast,
downstream on demand labels, or service level solutions like multi
segment pseudowires. We have thousands of MPLS CPEs deployed at this
point. Those endpoints are all L2 pseudowires, which are end to end or
terminate into virtual L3
Good morning,
I would like to ask you all for some suggestions.
In my scenario there are several hundreds of remote sites and 2 central sites.
We're using IPSec VTI tunnels between the remote and central sites.
Each remote site has a primary and a backup circuit with different BW.
We were
Dear all,
I am trying to deploy an Aironet 1242AG lightweight access point at a
remote site which connects to the main office via an ADSL link. The ADSL
modem also functions as a NAT gateway for this remote site. The problem I
am facing is that although the LAP registers successfully with the
There are a number of solutions like using BGP labeled unicast, downstream
on demand labels, or service level solutions like multi segment pseudowires
Yes these all fall under the unified mpls umbrella
EVPN should help out with things as well
Yes the PBB-EVPN should be available this year
adam
Hi,
I'm in the process of upgrading 12K IOS XR from 3.6 to 4.2. But according
to cisco upgrade path its seems to be from 3.6 - 3.9 , 3.9 - 4.2 (
http://www.cisco.com/web/Cisco_IOS_XR_Software/index.html#XR12000) .
therefore i'm wondering that whether i can do turboboot . but there is no
reference
I was concerned about the control plane security.
And I admit I haven't thought about the data-plane security i.e. sniffing or
forging of the PE to PE data type of attacks.
So you are 100% sure that no one can access your wires under no
circumstances in all of your backbone?
I mean this is why
On (2013-03-05 14:07 +0100), Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
So you are 100% sure that no one can access your wires under no
circumstances in all of your backbone?
Not at all. But adding MPLS to customer would increase our exposure.
--
++ytti
___
On 05-03-13 14:01, ibogzipper iboge wrote:
Hi,
I'm in the process of upgrading 12K IOS XR from 3.6 to 4.2. But according
to cisco upgrade path its seems to be from 3.6 - 3.9 , 3.9 - 4.2 (
http://www.cisco.com/web/Cisco_IOS_XR_Software/index.html#XR12000) .
therefore i'm wondering that
In ios xr how would I summarize all more specific's within this range, BUT
leak a more specifics ?
router bgp 64512
vrf one
rd 1.1.1.1:1
address-family ipv4 unicast
aggregate-address 10.0.0.0/8 summary-only
but I want to leak, 10.10.10.0/24
how would I do that ?
Aaron
Thanks Grzegorz, down time window is the problem to go for 2 steps .
rommon upgrades are in the FPD package but if i want to do the turboboot
there is no way that i can install the new pie c12k-fpd.pie-4.2.4 on 3.6.2
and upgrade the rommon . is there any package that i can copy and upgrade
the
Have you looked to see if you download the rommon separately?
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:48 AM, ibogzipper iboge ibogzip...@gmail.comwrote:
Thanks Grzegorz, down time window is the problem to go for 2 steps .
rommon upgrades are in the FPD package but if i want to do the turboboot
there is
25Mb per 3 QSFP ports.
http://d2zmdbbm9feqrf.cloudfront.net/2013/eur/pdf/BRKARC-3453.pdf
6004 starts at $90k list. 6001 pricing is not finalized yet, but should be
around half of that.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[resending using cisco-nsp subscribed address]
On Mar 6, 2013 5:13 AM, Dale Shaw dale.s...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Fernando,
On Mar 5, 2013 9:52 PM, Fernando Santos fernandomiguelsan...@gmail.com
wrote:
[…]
We were trying to figure out if there is a way to keep only 1 tunnel
between each
Thanks for the suggestion Dale, I'll have a look into that.
In the meantime, if anybody has any more ideas please let me know.
Regards,
Fernando
On 05/03/2013, at 18:13, Dale Shaw dale.s...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Fernando,
On Mar 5, 2013 9:52 PM, Fernando Santos
I hope someone has seen something like this:
%SW_MATM-4-MACFLAP_NOTIF: Host .. in vlan 111 is flapping
between port Fa0/15 and port Fa0/8
Fa0/15 and F0/8 are server ports,the servers connected to the ports are
sending Ethernet frames destined to the all zero's mac address.
What is
About that, Oliver, is multicast-BGP production ready in IOS ans IOS XR.
Specifically ASR9k, 7606 Sup720, ME3600X and 3560/3750?
Whould be nice too remove PIM from the core, just as Gert says limited use
= limited support.
On 1 March 2013 19:23, Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 6 Mar 2013, Mattias Gyllenvarg wrote:
About that, Oliver, is multicast-BGP production ready in IOS ans IOS XR.
Specifically ASR9k, 7606 Sup720, ME3600X and 3560/3750?
People have been running multicast on XR (ASR9K) and 7600 since forever.
I'd be more worried about ME3600X and
22 matches
Mail list logo
