Hi All,
Just came up against a bit of a weird issue and would appreciate some
advice/input. Basic environment of two 3800s
c3845-advipservicesk9-mz.124-21a. operating HSRP and plugging into a layer 2
switch network where servers connect (there are only 2-3 servers attached to
two switches at
I had the same problem when trying to police L2 traffic and I've been told to
use the dscp default to match all traffic
You don't need to qualify it, it is already default, so why setting it again?
This is what you should try based on what I use and it works fine:
! Don't forget to set this
Thank you all for the pointers. Tcptrace does seem quite interesting,
even though it doesn't seem to be actively maintained since 2004. I had
of course overlooked Arbor Peakflow SP which seems very interesting.
Would there happen to be anybody on this list using Peakflow for quality
analysis? Any
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 15:02 -0700, Jared Gillis wrote:
Hm, interesting though. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to pan out in the lab.
The LSPs don't seem to get flooded, but the routes do get passed through
Router
A to all the stub routers, regardless of how I set up the mesh-groups.
right.
Hi,
We have an LNS (7200) configured for DSL from one provider, we wish to keep
this provider, however they only offer us DSL1, but we are negotiating with
another wholesaler to supply us with ADSL2+ (only) .
My question is how easy is it to have this single LNS server to service all
customers
hello,
In OSPF, how can I filter the default route from being propagated out in the
same area? I want to deny the external default route in outbound routes so
other routers in the same area doesn't accept the default route from that
router.
Thank you,
Manaf
use the desktop vlan template
--
From: Carl Jones c...@outerloop.net
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 4:21 AM
To: cisco-nsp cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] 3750 Suggestions?
Hi all,
I'm looking for something suitable to take the load
why you don't configure another vpdn-group with another virtual-template
interface? it should be working very well!
--
From: Ed Lazerus edlazeru...@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 2:50 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp]
http://tools.cisco.com/Support/SNMP/do/BrowseOID.do?objectInput=1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.392.1.3.21.1.1translate=TranslatesubmitValue=SUBMITsubmitClicked=true
Permission: not-accessible
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On
It'll give for more mac space , but you'll have the same problem with routes.
Vlan is basically a layer 2 only template so all your ip routes with not be
hardware forwarded.
For this you'd need an external router.You could try and take a 3750 out of the
stack and use it as the router , the
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_0s/feature/guide/routmap.html
Manaf Al Oqlah wrote:
hello,
In OSPF, how can I filter the default route from being propagated out in the
same area? I want to deny the external default route in outbound routes so
other routers in the same area doesn't
I use a script that logs on to the ASA runs a cmd and exports the
result as a data source within cacti. It works quite well for overall
avg statistics.
Sent from my iPod Touch.
On 06/08/2009, at 8:56 PM, Bagosi Rómeó bagosi.ro...@iqsys.hu wrote:
on 6500 with 3bxl sup720:
will concurrent use of ( 10K) netflow exports ( 10Gb/s) vacl
caputure exhaust tcam more quickly than each by itself?
how do I monitor this?
how do I check status?
Regards,
Ge Moua | Email: moua0...@umn.edu
Network Design Engineer
University of Minnesota |
I don't disagree. It was a good theory though.
Rodney
David Hughes wrote:
Hi
But seeing as the OP indicated that one of the circuits was 2GB
*underutilised* you'd be looking for 3 src/dst pairs that were all doing
2GB to get this situation. It's looking pretty unlikely that this is a
sh contr cbus | incl 1/0:14|1/0:15
Todd wrote:
Currently running Version 12.4(23). I may upgrade to (25) to see if that
helps at all.
VIP Console:
VIP-Slot5sh ppp multilink
dmlp_ipc_config_count 210
dmlp_bundle_count 4
Bundle Multilink75, 2 members
bundle 0x61B1C3A0, frag_mode 0
tag
Peter,
(not to hijack the thread, just to comment on tcptrace)
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, Peter Rathlev wrote:
Thank you all for the pointers. Tcptrace does seem quite interesting,
even though it doesn't seem to be actively maintained since 2004.
At the IETF in Stockholm I had a chat with one of
Kevin Loch wrote:
Try adjusting 'service counters max age' to zero if you haven't already.
As others have pointed out a delay of 3-4 minutes is not normal
What does your SP (not RP) cpu usage look like? Try disabling netflow
if your SP cpu usage is maxing out.
Are there any snmp oids we can
No output from the command.
summit#sh contr cbus | incl 1/0:14|1/0:15
summit#
I also upgrade to 12.4(25) last night and no change in the issue. The same
issue still remains.
-Original Message-
From: Rodney Dunn [mailto:rod...@cisco.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 9:47 AM
To: Todd
BGP shows up on our 7200s as Local (addresses changed):
Cisco-7200sh ip cache flow | inc 00B3
Gi0/3.123 100.100.10.219 Local 100.100.10.200 06
8355 00B365
EIGRP is Null, though:
Cisco-7200sh ip cache flow | inc 224.0
Gi0/1.11 100.100.10.111 Null 224.0.0.10
Just make sure you configure the distribute-list in on ALL OTHER routers
in the area, otherwise you'll get some hard-to-troubleshoot loops or
blackholes.
Ivan
http://www.ioshints.info/about
http://blog.ioshints.info/
-Original Message-
From: Gergely Antal [mailto:sk...@skoal.name]
Can't you do a distribute-list out on the ABR/ASBR whichever the router is?
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ivan Pepelnjak
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 12:01 PM
To: sk...@skoal.name; 'Manaf Al Oqlah'
Can you get me remote access to it to look?
You can use the ip of: 64.100.21.4
if you want to punch a hole for me.
Just get sh contr cbus. The | probably didn't match the exact
interface number correctly.
Todd wrote:
No output from the command.
summit#sh contr cbus | incl 1/0:14|1/0:15
Hi,
We are trying to upgrade IOS on a Cisco 7206VXR (NPE-G1) processor
(revision B) with 983040K/65536K bytes of memory.
Currently running Version 12.3(13a), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) but we need
L2TPv3 functionality to configure a xconnects using a pw-class statement.
We tried running Version
We're trying to formulate a plan to do a soft-disconnect or redirect
users to a site where they can pay their bill online to get reconnected
when they get disconnected for billing.
Mostly we're talking about either bridged or pppoa dsl customers, or
cablemodem customers. Using 7204's and
Hi,
Thank you for your advice, however, increasing the timers
did not work.
I powered down the active linecards from switch 2
yesterday to see if it stopped the unicast flood, which it did.
Today I increased the mac address syncronisation activity
time to 640 and the mac address
No, you cannot control the LSA flooding (apart from blocking the flooding
over a particular interface). All LSAs still get to all the routers (this is
what you've asked for: OSPF is a link-state protocol :), but you can control
which of the best OSPF routes get inserted in the IP routing table
Daniel Verlouw wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 15:02 -0700, Jared Gillis wrote:
Hm, interesting though. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to pan out in the lab.
The LSPs don't seem to get flooded, but the routes do get passed through
Router
A to all the stub routers, regardless of how I set up the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Sorry for the late follow-up on this,
Saku Ytti wrote:
Other thing that annoys me is how SNMP pollers are implemented,
they're blocking, giving sucky performance on misbehaving or down
nodes.
Oh I agree, most of the free NMS systems out
Here's a thought: If I change Router A to L2 and Routers B and C to L2/L1, I can
put B and C in different areas, but because they are L2/L1, they learn all the
routes to all the areas, just as L2 routes instead of L1 routes.
This gets me each stub router and everything behind it into different
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 09:50:28PM +1000, Ed Lazerus wrote:
Is it a mater of duplicating the following?
Basically, yes. Add a new vpdn-group, and (optionally) a new virtual-template.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
Hi All:
Anyone using IPSLAs with OpenNMS or any other favorite tool?
I just set up a small test network and am thinking about adding this to a
couple of our WAN routers closest to our PBXs and setting up remote switches
that VoIP phones are on to monitor jitter, etc of our VoIP traffic.
Any
Hi Andy,
We're using 12.2(33)SRD1 and recently before that SRC3 on 7204 LNS routers
without any issues.
We don't have any eBGP on these devices, but iBGP works fine with about 9 peers
on each router carrying internal MP-BGP routes.
These routers also authenticate PPP sessions via RADIUS and
Ivan is correct, I know this first hand after wrestling with this very recently.
You can only filter inbound from OSPF to the route table and you will need to
do it on each OSPF router in the area.
Cisco reference is here:
I'm trying to configure mpls mtu 1508 on a dot1q subinterface on a
2851. IOS 12.4(7) will allow it, but IOS 12.4(22)T won't. The Bug
Toolkit doesn't show any relevant bugs. Has anyone else run into this?
Is there a recommended release? I would really like a release that
supports mpls
C and C Dominte wrote:
Thank you for your advice, however, increasing the timers
did not work.
I powered down the active linecards from switch 2
yesterday to see if it stopped the unicast flood, which it did.
Today I increased the mac address syncronisation activity
time to 640 and
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, Christopher Hunt wrote:
I'm trying to configure mpls mtu 1508 on a dot1q subinterface on a 2851.
IOS 12.4(7) will allow it, but IOS 12.4(22)T won't. The Bug Toolkit doesn't
show any relevant bugs. Has anyone else run into this? Is there a
recommended release? I would
This sounds like the unequal multipath is a quirk (feature?)
of sup720 default load sharing behavior. It happens to any multipath
routes (static, ospf, bgp) installed in the FIB:
http://cisco.cluepon.net/index.php/Sup720_load_balancing
shows a different ratios than OP but that might be due to
Agreed, your mileage may vary on the exact timers to use (I ended up at 900
seconds), but synchronizing MAC and ARP aging timers should solve your
unicast flooding issues, assuming the traffic is to legitimate destinations.
Have you captured any traffic to identify the destination of flooded
38 matches
Mail list logo