Hi All
R1 isn't setting ATT bit in its LSP it is like that R1 forwards L1 default
route to all its L1 neighbors in DEF the originatation area (but it is not
shown in R1-LSP) , I connected R4 to R1 with L2 ADJ between them and there
is no DEF route !!
any explainsion ?
R1#sh isis database
IS-IS
Arie,
I'm actually trying something strange in the lab, but i wanted to ask opinions
before
trying all the alternatives.
More specifically i want to transfer double tagged traffic from multiple subifs of a local
MUX-UNI interface to multiple remote physical interfaces, where the outer tag
Hi all
To make it clearer , i don't have a problem with default route on R1 i have
a problem with the default route on R2 and R3
best regards
--Ibrahim
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Ibrahim Abo Zaid
ibrahim.aboz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All
R1 isn't setting ATT bit in its LSP it is
Have you tried to use native VLAN on 7600-1 for the subinterface? Mind
you, I'm not 100% sure if you can actually xconnect native VLAN, but
you may give it a go...
--
Marko
CCIE #18427 (SP)
My network blog: http://cisco.markom.info/
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 09:19, Tassos
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 13:32, Marko Milivojevicmar...@markom.info wrote:
Have you tried to use native VLAN on 7600-1 for the subinterface? Mind
you, I'm not 100% sure if you can actually xconnect native VLAN, but
you may give it a go...
Sorry, I meant to say on 7600-2.
--
Marko
CCIE #18427
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 01:15:13PM -0400, Lee wrote:
Maybe that'll help push my learn perl todo item up a bit higher on
my list :) But that's assuming netconf/xml makes expect scripts a bit
less dependent on the exact formatting of the output. If upgrading
the OS requires updating the xml
This is the only other contact I have right now:
Oscar Bauer ba...@cisco.com
Software Downloads (in general ast here are internal code names)
Software Delivery System (SDS)
FTP.cisco.com
Cisco View Planner
Resource Management Essentials (RME) Planner
IOS Upgrade Planner (retired in April)
Well, you could use a loopback cable solution (not the prettiest
solution around).
So on 7600-2 you use a trunk port with multiple sub-ifs (like on 7600-1)
but loop it back to a regular l2 trunk port. Then you just connect the
CPE's to regular access ports on the VLANs.
What I am not sure is
What I am not sure is whether the 7600 would even allow you to put an
access port on the same VLAN used on the sub-if. No quick way for me to
test it right now.
I can answer that... It won't allow it. This solution with LAN line
cards would require VLAN mapping, which isn't pretty, at all.
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco IOS XR
Software Border Gateway Protocol Vulnerability
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20090818-bgp
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20090818-bgp.shtml
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2009
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 05:19:51PM +0200, Arie Vayner (avayner) wrote:
What I am not sure is whether the 7600 would even allow you to put an
access port on the same VLAN used on the sub-if. No quick way for me to
test it right now.
Not with SX* software - VLAN space is global, and a VLAN
This is true.
The only way to get rid of the global VLAN scope is by using SIP/ES
modules (which require SR software)
Arie
-Original Message-
From: Gert Doering [mailto:g...@greenie.muc.de]
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 19:38
To: Arie Vayner (avayner)
Cc: Tassos Chatzithomaoglou;
Yes it is meant to be supported. It was supported in previous releases.
Ian
Cameron Dry wrote:
Does anyone know if the OSM-2+4GE-WAN+ supports copper GBICs in the WAN ports
- currently installed in a 7600 running 12.2SRC4.
Thanks
Cameron
Does anyone have any good links to an order of operations for what
happens in what order on the assorted types of Cisco interfaces in both
the ingress and egress directions?
I found one that touchs on the QoS order of operations:
I don't believe there is a comprehensive one published on CCO besides
the following document for the 7600.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps708/prod_white_paper0900aecd80673385.html
If we just consider LAN modules, then all encapsulation operations are
done by the
On access layer ports in our environment 15pps works well. Very rarely we
have some weird print server or some device that bursts above that, but we
never have had to go above 30pps on an access port. Since we limit on the
edge ports we don't put a limit on the trunks...
Bill M
-Original
We had a Sup720B (non-redundant, running modular SXI) crash, due to what looks
like was due to a CPU_MONITOR watchdog event. What was nasty though was that
rather than reload, it hung (dead and unresponsive console) and required a
power cycle.
The RP crashinfo made it out fine, however SP
There are multiple causes of crashes and several causes of system
'hang' (high CPU, memory depletion, etc) and both should be
investigated independently.
Do you have any syslogs from a few minutes before the crash? If yes
send over along with RP crashinfo, whatever was captured from SP and
Hi there,
I need to implement some traffic shaping on some SVI VLAN interfaces (a
customer either with 1 server or 10 servers) on a 6509/Sup32.
Running IOS is advipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-33.SXI1.
I have currently setup some policy-maps that do some policing, which are
feed by class-maps with
Update: I could not keep the link up on the Sup32. Even hardcoding the MAC
addresses, traffic would flat stop at random times. However, it's been up
for 4 days now on a Sup2. Specific interface/vlan config is exactly the
same. Only differences are the Sups, IOS, and linecard.
So, does anyone
William,
Thanks for the response. Funny you mention the print server because
that happens to be one device port I need to tweak since it occasionally
exceeds the 15 pps.
Thanks again,
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Murphy, William [mailto:william.mur...@uth.tmc.edu]
Sent: Tuesday,
On 18/08/2009, at 11:48 PM, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
Those namespaces are specified as versions of the netconf namespace,
not as Cisco-specific namespaces. Those will change only for
subsequent versions of the top-most, Netconf-defined tags.
Unfortunately, JUNOS does encode generating versions
You need to get more data when it's failing for anyone to help.
sh ip arp
sh adj detail
sh mls cef ip
as starters.
Graham Wooden wrote:
Update: I could not keep the link up on the Sup32. Even hardcoding the MAC
addresses, traffic would flat stop at random times. However, it's been up
for 4
Ah-ha! I found the solution to my first inquire - traffic shapping on SVIs.
Apparently the key was mls qos vlan-based on the actual LAN interface. Now
its adhering both input and output. I'll see if I can tweak to fit a dot1q
subint.
On 8/18/09 8:52 PM, Graham Wooden gra...@g-rock.net wrote:
Hi Rodney,
When the last outage occurred, I did a quick assessment of the output of
those two commands and reviewed it with output while it was working - and
nothing stuck out wrong or incorrect. I however, didn't do the sh mls cef.
In a haste effort to get this particular customer up, I moved
Oh, the fun. I am not making much headway with this. After reading the Qos
on the PFC, I am even more lost. I can't seem to do any traffic shaping
within the map. I can't do the police cir, bandwidth percentage, etc.
Does anyone have any good working examples?
class-map match-any VOIP
match
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009, Graham Wooden wrote:
Oh, the fun. I am not making much headway with this. After reading the Qos
on the PFC, I am even more lost. I can't seem to do any traffic shaping
within the map. I can't do the police cir, bandwidth percentage, etc.
Does anyone have any good working
Thanks Mikael - that did the trick.
By hardcoding the bit rate on the police I am now able to sort out my
specified traffic into my different rate patterns.
-graham
On 8/18/09 10:08 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.se wrote:
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009, Graham Wooden wrote:
Oh, the fun. I
There are multiple causes of crashes and several causes of system 'hang'
(high
CPU, memory depletion, etc) and both should be investigated independently.
Yes, crash itself didn't seem particularly interesting, but am pursuing that
w/ TAC. It looked like it was a good and orderly reset,
Hi All,
I just have a question, as we know that Cisco preserve VLAN 1 for
management issues and network management needed protocols like CDP,
VTP and the like, and all access from other VLANs to this VLAN should
be restricted except from the management VLAN, as for our network, we
are
30 matches
Mail list logo
