Yes i grub 'show tech' information, but i found nothing on it
The listing of our configuration iBGP from which we have a problem
router bgp id
bgp router-id router-id
no bgp fast-external-fallover
bgp always-compare-med
bgp log-neighbor-changes
neighbor 2.2.2.2 remote-as as-id
neighbor
Remote neighbor logged massages Hold timer expired
The current neighbor got down every 180 seconds, however 180 seconds (Hold
timer) session was up.
But no prefixes receive. Session was being restarted cyclically, so i think
that logs is consequence of session destruction.
Why the session was
I think your session is being restarted every 180 seconds, because your
keepalives aren't going through. It may happen it you have low MTU and high MSS
size for BGP packets, your updates can't get to neighbor and they get queued
and keepalives are standing behind updates packets
You will see
Hi,
I have a client who is wanting to run 10G from their Nexus 5000 to a
server. The design has specified HP 10G card on the servers, which
come with SFP+ HP 7M Twinax cables.
Obviously these are not listed on the Nexus 5k data sheet, but does
anyone know if they will work? Are they just re
We used them in one project. Seem to work.
Aivars
Hi,
I have a client who is wanting to run 10G from their Nexus 5000 to a
server. The design has specified HP 10G card on the servers, which
come with SFP+ HP 7M Twinax cables.
Obviously these are not listed on the Nexus 5k data sheet,
Hello Friends,
In our Topology discovery tool, we are able to discover the Cisco Switches
and Routers.
When it comes of discovering the links we are using the
BRIDGE_MIB/IF_MIB/MIB-II...
this way we are able to discover the links between the Cisco Switches
(series Catalyst 2950)
But when we
Dears,
We will go with route reflectors. The two routers A and B will be RR. Some
questions:
- Could we still use peers group with RR?
- Is it needed to create a cluster for router A and B? The issue is that A
will not accept routes advertised by B because it's the same cluster. We
would like
All,
I am configuring an MPLS peer between devices.
I am forcing the 6509 globally to use LDP as the protocol and also now have
forced the interface
mpls label protocol ldp
mpls ip
the same.
yet when the LDP neighbor session come UP i get a this in logs:
TAGCON-3-TDPID TDP Id/Addr mapping
Two words: logging anachronisms.
It should be otherwise fine. Verify neighs are speaking/exchanging ldp helos
with sh mpls ldp disc and sh mpls ldp nei
-Tk
-Original Message-
From: Chris Lane clane1...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 09:21:09
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:21 AM, tkap...@gmail.com wrote:
Two words: logging anachronisms.
It should be otherwise fine. Verify neighs are speaking/exchanging ldp helos
with sh mpls ldp disc and sh mpls ldp nei
-Tk
We see the same thing. It's cosmetic.
Someone at Cisco needs to run: sed
On Wed, 26 May 2010 11:50:30 +0100, you wrote:
Obviously these are not listed on the Nexus 5k data sheet, but does
anyone know if they will work? Are they just re branded Cisco ones, or
are the Cisco ones re branded generic cables?
The supported ones (incl. 3rd party) are listed here:
Dears
i have Cisco 1842 router
i have configure it with the below commands
snmp-server group GROUP v3 auth
snmp-server user USER GROUP v3 auth sha PASSWORD priv des PASSWORD1
and all worked fine
now on Cisco ME3750 switches , i cannot complete the second command as below
snmp-server user
How to remove my e-mail from this list?
Thanks,
Thiago
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
On 5/26/10 8:08 AM, Thiago - Renatec wrote:
How to remove my e-mail from this list?
Thanks,
Thiago
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
Click ^^^this^^^ link (directly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cisco Security Advisory: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco Network
Building Mediator
Document ID: 111014
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20100526-mediator
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20100526-mediator.shtml
Revision 1.0
For Public Release
Does anyone happen to know if the 'service unsupported-transceiver'
command still works in the new 3560X/3750X series switches? I have a
need for super long-range single strand SFPs and would rather use
switches over media converters if I can help it.
Thanks
Justin
I have tested TYCO cables as well.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Hi
Is it generally done to exchange ipv6 info with bgp peers defined only by ipv4
router ids?
Ie:
Router bgp 65001
Neighbor 1.2.3.4 remote-as 65001
!
Address-family ipv6
Neighbor 1.2.3.4 activate
!
New gig, no CLI yet :)
Thanks
Christian
___
Folks,
I thought I would check with you all to see if any of you have two (2) USED
WS-C3750-48TS-S switches that you would be willing to sell.
I would rather buy from a person that knows of the gear and not just have it
bounced around on the grey markets...
Please email me off the list. Thank
I know there have been a lot of similar questions recently regarding this topic
but has anyone had good/bad experience with ACP - Memory Upgrades X2 - 1 x
10Gbase-SR in a 6708 blade? It is suppose to be a compatible 10GB SR X2
Transceiver. The manufacturer is ACP-EP at
On 26/05/2010, at 10:30 PM, jaikar gupta wrote:
But when we introduce the Cisco Routers (2509 series) in the network and run
the discovery it doesnt show the links between the Router-Switch as well as
Router-Router,
The problem with the Link discover is that their is no value in the
On 2010.05.26 15:50, Christian MacNevin wrote:
Hi
Is it generally done to exchange ipv6 info with bgp peers defined only by
ipv4 router ids?
Ie:
Router bgp 65001
Neighbor 1.2.3.4 remote-as 65001
!
Address-family ipv6
Neighbor 1.2.3.4 activate
If I understand your question correctly,
Thanks Lincoln ,
*
*
*But i would like to know from where i can find those (e.g MAC Address.)
means from which OID.*
*
*Thanks Regards
Jaikar Gupta
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 6:55 AM, Lincoln Dale l...@cisco.com wrote:
On 26/05/2010, at 10:30 PM, jaikar gupta wrote:
But when we introduce
routers typically expose that via RFC1213-MIB, specifically ipNetToMediaTable.
On 27/05/2010, at 2:03 PM, jaikar gupta wrote:
Thanks Lincoln ,
But i would like to know from where i can find those (e.g MAC Address.)
means from which OID.
Thanks Regards
Jaikar Gupta
On Thu, May
24 matches
Mail list logo