On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Joseph Hardeman jwharde...@gmail.comwrote:
Hey Guys,
I have a question regarding displaying the as-path prepends that I am
announcing to my providers. With a foundry I could display the prepends
that I am announcing out, but I don't seem to be able to do that
At the moment I have a following setup:
http://img69.imageshack.us/img69/4227/252530.png
The ISP-A connection is the primary link and the ISP-B connection(over
WiMAX) is the backup one. In case the primary link fails, I physically
plug out the fiber-optical converter cable from my Cisco
Asking for the best solution: Yes its via BGP
provided that you have you own Public IP space and ASN otherwise its not
possible with 2 different ISPs. Adding HWIC-2FE would serve the physical
requirement in your scenario.
m2c
Regards,
Aftab A. Siddiqui
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Martin T
Aftab,
HWIC-2FE was exactly the card I was looking as well. As I don't have a
public IP address space and ASN, what options are left there in order
to achieve automatic failover?
regards,
martin
2011/8/8 Aftab Siddiqui aftab.siddi...@gmail.com:
Asking for the best solution: Yes its via BGP
Stick with multihoming with Single ISP. i.e. get 2 last miles with the ISP
and a public pool to advertise and manage the auto failover via BGP.
Secondly you can achieve multihoming with 2 ISP using IP SLA, though it is
not a best practice but surely workable. Take a look at the following link.
Hey Guys,
Thanks for the answers and they are all what I am expecting. I haven't been
able to find the command either. :-( I guess I will have to go with
setting up a route server for testing with to make sure my route-maps are
right.
The problem with the route server, Ziv, is that with
On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Aftab Siddiqui wrote:
Asking for the best solution: Yes its via BGP
provided that you have you own Public IP space and ASN otherwise its not
possible with 2 different ISPs. Adding HWIC-2FE would serve the physical
requirement in your scenario.
BGP is the best way to go,
Get a 2950 or even a 3524XL, use vlans and subinterfaces.
Use BGP if available.
Otherwise, if you are already using NAT, then this should work fine.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_3/12_3x/12_3xe/feature/guide/dbackupx.html
https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-8313
If you need
Hi All ,
Will VRF-LITE work for secondary ip address on an interface?
I have the following configuration for an internet router ,where in i have
configured route leaking between VRF internet and global routing table ,
however the routing is working only for Primary ip address
ip vrf internet
Hi Farooq,
I see this happening most of the time when I have a host, dual homed to
2 different switches for HA purposes , and the host link
bonding/aggregation is configured to do load balancing instead of
active/backup.
Essentially its sending the traffic down both links, and switches
Hi,
The switch found the traffic from the specified host flapping between
the specified ports. [enet] is the host MAC address, [chars] [dec] is
the switch ID, the first and second [chars] are the ports between
which the host traffic is flapping.
Recommended Action: Check the network switches for
We are getting intermittent netflow from our 7606 routers (flows show up for a
few seconds, then go away). The traffic is a consistent market data feed that
averages around 100MBps, but we are only seeing a fraction of that via Netflow.
We are running NAT and ACL, but the FM seems to be
On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 21:51 +0530, Ranjith R wrote:
Will VRF-LITE work for secondary ip address on an interface?
I was puzzled by this question, but you're quite right: What you test
here doesn't work right for secondary addresses, at least on the
Sup720-3B SXI on which I tested.
My gut feeling
13 matches
Mail list logo
