I have a customer who wishes to be multi-homed with us and another Service
Provider and wishes to have 2 full views. We proposed a Cisco 7206VXR-NPE-G1
with 1Gb/256 and the other vendor (a small ISP) provided him with a
7304-NSE-100 and a SPA2-1Gb card as a solution. He has 1Gb with 100Mb
can dsl customers be seperated based on speed in cisco PPPoe
thanks for any clues on this
regards
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
Questions:
3. Is there something special about this 7304 that I am missing?
It's an old deprecated product which went End of Sale in July 4, 2010.
5. Is this a good choice for a customer router?
I would rather choose an ASR1001. It's a modern platform and do
out-perform a 7304 in
On (2011-10-04 23:21 -0700), puck-...@interworld.net wrote:
I have a customer who wishes to be multi-homed with us and another Service
Provider and wishes to have 2 full views. We proposed a Cisco
7206VXR-NPE-G1 with 1Gb/256 and the other vendor (a small ISP) provided him
with a
On Tue, 4 Oct 2011, Mack McBride wrote:
The 9K uses a crossbar fabric evolved from the 6500/7600 (not the same as the GSR
- CRS evolved fabric)
The port interface chips are the same.
The NPU chip is the same as used in the ES cards.
Primary difference is in the way the FIB is run on the 9K
Can you define separated?
Basically, you can have a user policy (per user or user group) on your
AAA server (RADIUS) with different policies such as QOS, IP Assignment,
VRF selection and many other options...
Arie
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
Hi,
I'm seeing the following output for show interface gig x/y switching
ROUTER#sh inter gig x/y switching
GigabitEthernet x/y
Throttle count 0
Drops RP 0 SP 0
SPD Flushes Fast 0 SSE 0
SPD
On 05/10/11 09:31, Waseem wrote:
Hi,
I'm seeing the following output for show interface gig x/y switching
What platform? What IOS version?
And what is your question?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
On 05/10/11 12:05, Waseem wrote:
7600+RSP720-3C-GE
12.2(33)SRB2
why I'm seeing 10% CPU utilization by interrupt handling?
Try using a SPAN of the CPU to see what traffic is hitting the CPU; this
is by far the quickest way to find the cause.
___
It is a regular internet traffic to port 80, from our customers, which should
be CEF switched.
From: Phil Mayers p.may...@imperial.ac.uk
To: Waseem waseem_alir...@yahoo.com
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2011
On 05/10/11 12:15, Waseem wrote:
It is a regular internet traffic to port 80, from our customers, which should
be CEF switched.
Port 80 traffic to where? Can you show some?
There must be something wrong with the traffic or your config for the
7600 to be process switching it. You need to
7600+RSP720-3C-GE
12.2(33)SRB2
why I'm seeing 10% CPU utilization by interrupt handling?
From: Phil Mayers p.may...@imperial.ac.uk
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2011 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] CPU utilization for handling interrupt
On 05/10/2011 12:15, Waseem wrote:
It is a regular internet traffic to port 80, from our customers, which should
be CEF switched.
Sounds like your router is punting all traffic. Are you seeing the
following errors in your logs?
%CFIB-SP-7-CFIB_EXCEPTION : FIB TCAM exception, Some entries
Good day everyone, Our SE is out of town and we have urgent project
for a telco this weekend.
is there any way to upgrade a 76-ES+XC-20G3C to a 76-ES+XC-20G3CXL? Is
this just a daughterboard issue?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
TCP Adjust-mss causes the 6k to punt the SYN to SW. I'm not sure if this
will be process switched or CEF switched (interrupt), but I don't see a
reason why we couldn't do it in software CEF.
-Pete
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org wrote:
On 05/10/2011 12:15, Waseem
I'm not receiving that log, I have nearly 600Mbps on this link, nearly 3 - 6
Mbps is being process switched from this link only, I tried to disable it, the
CPU due to interrupt got 0%.
please check the following packets.
--
interface
On 05/10/11 14:15, Pete Lumbis wrote:
TCP Adjust-mss causes the 6k to punt the SYN to SW. I'm not sure if this
will be process switched or CEF switched (interrupt), but I don't see a
reason why we couldn't do it in software CEF.
Ah, well spotted; I didn't see that.
FWIW I have used adjust-mss
Hi, TCP adjust-mss is the key, you were right.
Thanks
Waseem
From: Pete Lumbis alum...@gmail.com
To: Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org
Cc: Waseem waseem_alir...@yahoo.com; NSP cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2011 4:15 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Cisco Security Advisory: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco ASA 5500
Series Adaptive Security Appliances and Cisco Catalyst 6500 Series ASA
Services Module
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20111005-asa
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2011 October 05 1600 UTC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Cisco Security Advisory: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco Firewall
Services Module
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20111005-fwsm
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2011 October 05 1600 UTC (GMT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Cisco Security Advisory: Directory Traversal Vulnerability in Cisco
Network Admission Control Manager
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20111005-nac
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2011 October 05 1600 UTC (GMT
Greetings,
I have a 6509 with an X6716-10GE Card equipped with Cisco X2-10GB-LX4 10GE
modules and a Cisco 2960S-48TD-L Switch with two Cisco SFP-10G-LRM
modules.
Right now I am not able to get an active link between these X2 and SFP
modules, it stays down/down (notconnected). I instantly get a
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 07:40:30PM +0200, ci...@entrap.de wrote:
I have a 6509 with an X6716-10GE Card equipped with Cisco X2-10GB-LX4 10GE
modules and a Cisco 2960S-48TD-L Switch with two Cisco SFP-10G-LRM
modules.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/10_Gigabit_Ethernet#10GBASE-LX4
and no...
are you sure that its supported?
lx4 == wwdm optic == 4x2.5gbps channels using wideband muxing.
additionally, when looking at datasheets for x2 and sfp+ modules, one
will see that lx4 optic mentions 4 lanes, launching in the 1300nm
space and a separate pluggable for x2-10gb-lrm.
sfp+ only
I believe LX4 uses multiple wavelengths. This seems to confirm it. I don't
think you can mix those with anything else.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/modules/ps5455/ps6574/product_dat
a_sheet0900aecd801f92aa.html
Thanks,
Chuck
-Original Message-
From:
Today I also noticed that all these connections are going over comcast
business. Anyone seen anything like this?
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Dustin Schuemann dschuem...@gmail.comwrote:
Do you have any other suggestions. TAC is kinda going around in circles.
On Sep 27, 2011, at 3:43 AM,
Hi,
On 6 October 2011 08:59, Robert Hass robh...@gmail.com wrote:
{cut}
3) What is performance of ASR903 (Gbps and PPS) - can I have it
wirerate with 5 x 10GE cards ?
AFAIK the chassis can take only 4 x10G (last two slots have only about
7G of capacity).
kind regards
Pshem
On Wednesday, October 05, 2011 02:51:18 PM Mohacsi Janos
wrote:
After some calculation:
AS9006 with 6-8 10 GE and 20 GE is slightly cheaper on
list prices than C7606 with similar amount of ports with
ES+ cards.
You really can get an ASR9000 at a much better, similarly-
spec'ed 7600. Just
On Wednesday, October 05, 2011 03:27:39 PM Saku Ytti wrote:
3.5Mpps is for single pass, quite many things force two
pass and halve performance. The platform is at its best
at relatively basic IP termination with QoS, there when
compared to VXR it offers superior and predictable
performance
On Thursday, October 06, 2011 10:19:20 AM Pshem Kowalczyk
wrote:
AFAIK the chassis can take only 4 x10G (last two slots
have only about 7G of capacity).
Can't say much about the box at the moment, but in case you
didn't notice, it's an IOS XE system, despite the 9
following ASR :-).
Maybe
30 matches
Mail list logo
