You could try CBQoS, using ACLs to put each set of interesting traffic into
its own class. You could then monitor the traffic hitting each class
with CISCO-CLASS-BASED-QOS-MIB,
like here:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/simple-network-management-protocol-snmp/119031-technote-router-00
>> Are you seeing any fabric drops? "show fabric drop"
Some fabric drops, but not very many:
Polling interval for drop counters and timestamp is 15 in seconds
Packets dropped by fabric for different queues:
slotchannelLow-Q-drops High-Q-drops
1 0
Either configure MST everywhere, once, same configuration;
Keep trunk vlan-assignement in sync with that
and never try to change to avoid problems.
So design your MST instances well;
or stay on Cisco pvst+ with only Cisco switches.
(caveat: some switches really want to have vlans mentioned in th
Dear experts,
I'm looking for hands on experience in interconnecting a huge cisco network
(>400 vlan) running PVST+ with some arista boxes which in principle as
default uses MST but in theory could interact with Cisco proprietary PVST+.
Despite the arista document which confirm the interop, has a
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 09:32:27PM +0200, Martin T wrote:
> thanks for reply! The example I gave was simplified. In short,
> unfortunately in this case it is not possible to configure those /31
> networks to separate sub-interfaces.
In that case, there are no SNMP counters that will help you
Jerry,
thanks for reply! The example I gave was simplified. In short,
unfortunately in this case it is not possible to configure those /31
networks to separate sub-interfaces.
Martin
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 6:12 PM, Jerry Bacon wrote:
> Just put each ISP on their own sub-interface.
>
> (Not su
On 06/03/17 14:23, CiscoNSP List wrote:
> either a single 9906 or 9010 (Fully redundant, dual RSP), with
> NCS5K's hanging of each on as satellites...theyve also proposed dual
> A9K-MOD200-SE's with 2 x A9K-48x10G-1G-SEthose with 9Ks will know
> how much those cost...insanely expensive.
I'm cu
Just put each ISP on their own sub-interface.
(Not sure why in the world you would have two different, unrelated
connections on the same sub-interface.)
--
Jerry Bacon
Senior Network Engineer
StarTouch, Inc.
http://www.startouch.com
360-543-5679 ext. 111
Microwave - Fiber Optics - Internet Se
Hi,
I have a Cisco ISR G2 router with following sub-interface configuration:
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/0.123
encapsulation dot1Q 123
ip address 10.10.10.58 255.255.255.254 secondary
ip address 192.168.1.42 255.255.255.254
end
10.10.10.58/31 is connection to ISP-1 and 192.168.1.42/31 is
con
Hi Everyone,
Received a draft proposal/bom from Cisco for a new "core"...we currently run a
bunch of ASR920's/ME3600's/ASR1Ks, utilising the 10G ports on ASR920's for
interpop...obviously these are limited, so more an more ASR920's are being
purchased purely for 10G...not ideal, so proposed de
On Fri Mar 03, 2017 at 09:04:28AM -0800, Peter Kranz wrote:
> On a WS-X6908-10G DCEF2T line card with SUP2T's, I ran into overruns
> yesterday on a 4x10G etherchannel that I am at a loss to resolve:
Are you seeing any fabric drops? "show fabric drop"
We're just troubleshooting a similar(ish) issu
11 matches
Mail list logo
