localpref and weights.
Andy
---
Andy Dills
Xecunet, Inc.
www.xecu.net
301-682-9972
---
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
aren't being properly
fragmented?
Thanks for any insight.
Andy
---
Andy Dills
Xecunet, Inc.
www.xecu.net
301-682-9972
---
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007, Pekka Savola wrote:
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, Andy Dills wrote:
Cliff notes:
Is the inability to get ping replies with datagrams of larger than 9216
bytes across a 100mbps ethernet circuit an indication that the far end is
setup with an MTU consistent with jumbo frames
it is in 'DISABLED'
state
Sounds like the slave RSP didn't boot, I'm guessing because of one of the
above. Make sure the image exists in both slot0 and slaveslot0.
Andy
---
Andy Dills
Xecunet, Inc.
www.xecu.net
301-682-9972
---
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
a commercial mail product are
companies without technical talent.
Andy
---
Andy Dills
Xecunet, Inc.
www.xecu.net
301-682-9972
---
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http
^
Is type-inconsis the same meaning as type-pvid-inconsistent?
This URL should help you identify what is causing the STP inconsistency:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/pvid_inconsistency_24063.html
Andy
---
Andy Dills
Xecunet, Inc.
www.xecu.net
301-682-9972
at the desired
rate.
Andy
---
Andy Dills
Xecunet, Inc.
www.xecu.net
301-682-9972
---
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
(inside,outside) tcp x.x.x.x http 192.168.1.2 https
Andy
---
Andy Dills
Xecunet, Inc.
www.xecu.net
301-682-9972
---
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net
posting to cisco-nsp for years
and can't remember getting an email from them.
That doesn't mean you're not correct, but you have to admit you're being a
little over the top.
Andy
---
Andy Dills
Xecunet, Inc.
www.xecu.net
301-682-9972
---
___
cisco
Try making that 50, see what happens. Probably nothing, but just in
case.
Andy
---
Andy Dills
Xecunet, Inc.
www.xecu.net
301-682-9972
---
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive
regardless.
Andy
---
Andy Dills
Xecunet, Inc.
www.xecu.net
301-682-9972
---
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
and replace it with appreciation.
Basically, if it's mandatory, why make it a line item...
Andy
---
Andy Dills
Xecunet, Inc.
www.xecu.net
301-682-9972
---
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco
in the past.
They're open to commercial solutions, but would prefer to keep costs down.
Host operating system requirements for the collector/analyzer aren't
important.
Does anybody have any suggestions they could pass along?
Thanks,
Andy
---
Andy Dills
Xecunet, Inc.
www.xecu.net
301-682-9972
involved: Stability, PPS, stability, stability.
What would people suggest for a nice, stable IOS?
Thanks,
Andy
---
Andy Dills
Xecunet, Inc.
www.xecu.net
301-682-9972
---
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net
suggestions?
Thanks,
Andy
---
Andy Dills
Xecunet, Inc.
www.xecu.net
301-682-9972
---
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
...the router won't
be doing anything else other than OSPF.
Thanks,
Andy
---
Andy Dills
Xecunet, Inc.
www.xecu.net
301-682-9972
---
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http
very pleased to discover that Verizon was finally offering this service in
our LATA. NxT1 now upgrades to ethernet instead of frac DS3 for our
customers.
Andy
---
Andy Dills
Xecunet, Inc.
www.xecu.net
301-682-9972
---
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco
are included in the ipsec sa).
It didn't seem to work...I didn't have good access to test, but before I
arrange for better access to really work with it, is this indeed possible?
Any configuration tips?
Thanks,
Andy
---
Andy Dills
Xecunet, Inc.
www.xecu.net
301-682-9972
which
server on the private network the traffic is NATed to.
Is this possible?
Thanks,
Andy
---
Andy Dills
Xecunet, Inc.
www.xecu.net
301-682-9972
---
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco
On Thu, 17 May 2012, Peter Rathlev wrote:
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 14:36 -0400, Andy Dills wrote:
So, in essence, I want to consider source address when determining which
server on the private network the traffic is NATed to.
Is this possible?
No problem. Take a look at Configuring
,
Andy
---
Andy Dills
Xecunet, Inc.
www.xecu.net
301-682-9972
---
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
traffic destined for an
L3 port would transit the VLAN like that.
Thanks,
Andy
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012, Andy Dills wrote:
I've got a customer with a weird situation.
They have a pretty straightforward setup, two 7200s fronting two cisco
3550-12s, distributing to a series of 48 port 3550s
/catalyst3550/software/release/12.2_44_se/configuration/guide/swadmin.html#wp1235565
Best regards,
Andras
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Andy Dills a...@xecu.net wrote:
I've got a customer with a weird situation.
They have a pretty straightforward setup, two 7200s fronting two cisco
3550
Just to follow up on this on the off chance somebody runs into this in the
future...a reload of the switch fixed the issue, and the traffic for the
L3 port stopped hitting vlan 1.
Andy
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012, Andy Dills wrote:
Thanks, I appreciate those suggestions. I verified both the SDM
,
Andy
---
Andy Dills
Xecunet, Inc.
www.xecu.net
301-682-9972
---
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
On Fri, 28 Dec 2012, Pete Lumbis wrote:
Are you terminating to the onboard ethernet port or a WIC? What code
version?
Both onboard ports, no WICs installed.
It's running 12.4(25d).
Thanks,
Andy
---
Andy Dills
Xecunet, Inc.
www.xecu.net
301-682-9972
the way to deal with older crappy wiring,
and it had enough juice to power through whatever is faulty in the
jackpanel.
Oh well. Fixed now. Thanks for all the replies on and off list suggesting
avenues for narrowing down the problem.
Andy
On Fri, 28 Dec 2012, Andy Dills wrote:
I'm having
27 matches
Mail list logo