Re: [c-nsp] DS3 Cables

cabling all of them which to me contradicts what has been said on this list. Wikipedia articles: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ds3 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RG59 -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco

Re: [c-nsp] 6500/7600 boot issues

, this was when SXE had just come out. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] 10Gigabit or other options for 12000 ?

is not something I would recommend. It's really bad if you're running the older Engine 2 linecards, otherwise it's managable. I still recommend ECMP over Etherchannel, though. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] 10Gigabit or other options for 12000 ?

I don't really see why you need it anyhow? -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] advice for L2 switches

. Don't bother with DHCP protection and other stuff in the fanout switches, they'll only break the other 23 participants and it's fairly easy to faultfind. So, in short, get cheap simple fan-out switch, do intelligence centrally. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [c-nsp] VTY locks on show commands

issue. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Routing recommendations

with it. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] DC powering for 3845 router

actually tested it), ymmv. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] High traffic/CPU utilization - 6509

SXF. It'll save you a lot of hassle in the long run. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail

Re: [c-nsp] High traffic/CPU utilization - 6509

bugfixed in 10 releases (basically) without adding any features. This is not bleeding edge, bleeding edge is when you install SXH (which is the first revision of that feature release). -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] OC-12 POS

On Thu, 25 Oct 2007, Aaron wrote: They do have a DPT but you wont get OC12 on it. The 7200 just can't do that much. The card will allow and OC12 through it. In real life it flatlined at adding/removing approx 120 megabit/s to/from the ring (empirical study). -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail

Re: [c-nsp] Understanding TCAM/route limitations in the GSR..

On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Pete Templin wrote: Very helpful information...what commands should I be using to assess where I'm at regarding Eng2 TCAM size? show controllers psa mem on the LC in question is a good starting point. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [c-nsp] DS3 abort errors - guidance?

or clock source internal in the CPE? From your description it sounds like you should run clock source line in the CPE. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman

Re: [c-nsp] %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH - But they aren't connected!

On Sun, 2 Dec 2007, Jay Hennigan wrote: Some non-Cisco gear relays CDP frames out all interfaces which results I would say ALL non-cisco devices will relay CDP frames (and rightly so). Only exception would be if someone else also implemented CDP. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL

Re: [c-nsp] [OT] Driving 1310nm optics through 1550nm circulators

communication systems and fiber-optic sensor applications. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco

Re: [c-nsp] TCP Throughput / MTU problem ? with Cisco 7304 and MPLS VPN's

the default ethernet 1500 mtu. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] TCP Throughput / MTU problem ? with Cisco 7304 and MPLS VPN's

On Sat, 12 Jan 2008, Peter Rathlev wrote: But you still can't (shouldn't) use an interface MTU lower that the MPLS MTU. Your interface MTU should be larger than the X MTU for any X. Why? -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ cisco

Re: [c-nsp] TCP Throughput / MTU problem ? with Cisco 7304 and MPLS VPN's

that is currently available. The situation with devices on a subnet / L2 broadcast domain where some speak mpls and some not, where some are older devices that do not support mtu higher than 1500, needs this behaviour to avoid a network redesign. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 bgp

command such as show bgp ipv6 unicast summary. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] IOS version

of the 6500. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] IOS version

On Tue, 18 Mar 2008, Jon Lewis wrote: On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Mark Tech wrote: We currently run Cisco 7206VXR's using c7200-p-mz.122-25.S train in an ISP environment. I am looking to get some 6500's but I'm a little confused as to which IOS

Re: [c-nsp] 7600 Questions

initially? I'd say it's worth it when you start to approach 5-10MPPS (due to CFC worst case limit of ~15 MPPS) but not before. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] GE Copper in 7140

have tried if you google a bit). That is the only way I can think of. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 7204 CPU utilisation.

should be able to do somewhere around 150-200 meg of mixed traffic (bidirectionally), so if you're at 60% cpu with 25 megs, that sounds like a lot of cpu for little traffic, even if you would be running an NPE-150 or even slower. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [c-nsp] GE Copper in 7140

case, since it's out of support and new software isn't compiled for it. So telling someone don't use it for MPLS when there is a way to do it that works, isn't really helpful. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ cisco-nsp mailing

Re: [c-nsp] compact flash speed

or BU. So don't expect this to get any better soon. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco

Re: [c-nsp] Switch 'routing' speed - 3560G/3750G

to) wirespeed at all packet sized, but they have limited features. I'd be more worried about the NPE-G2 performance if I were you. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] Bandwidth Vs Number of Users

here, we give 1000 users at least a gig, as they're going to use it if they can. So it's impossible to say how much is enough as it's very different depending on audience and how much connectivity is available. There is no such thing as too much. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [c-nsp] CEF Load balancing over Etherchannel (3750)

of the progress on this case, there must be very few people doing etherchannel on these platforms. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive

Re: [c-nsp] 10GE sanity check

of ZX. The -24dB receiver on the ZX can be sensitive enough to receive the LX on the other end correctly. Gigabit ethernet is mostly a play with attenuation and only attenuation, whereas on 10G things like dispersion and other factors start to be important as well. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail

Re: [c-nsp] 7200s (VXRs and not) and MPLS capabilities

accept it. PA-FDDI won't work in VXR (which I guess is less of a problem). I even need a VXR to run a NPE-300? Yes. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 Migration with ISIS (was Route Reflector Design)

is a great idea and I would really like to run it, but it just didn't work with our mix of platforms and vendors. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo

Re: [c-nsp] GigE Max Speed

over the link. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Layer 2 question

and you can implement filtering etc? -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] old 6513 chassis vs sup720

for SUP720. In my experience, not even Cisco will get it right all the time in what's needed to get an old chassis to work with SUP720. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https

Re: [c-nsp] Shaping vs. queuing

30-40ms, then you might as well drop it (using WRED for instance). -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http

Re: [c-nsp] 4 Byte AS implementation on Cisco Routers

rebuild. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS VPN QoS on a SP core

On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Sami Joseph wrote: Is there a way to provide QoS for a specific VPN in an MPLS VPN Core? Yes. Depends on what you want, but you can for instance mark MPLS EXP for the traffic in a certain VPN and treat those packets differently in your core. -- Mikael Abrahamsson

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS VPN QoS on a SP core

data (interactive applications) and then an best effort class. You might want to put all your VPN traffic into priority data and let your Internet uses get a lower SLA if you mix Internet and VPN traffic in your core. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS VPN Question about PE-CE - Private or Public IP?

to be unique per VPN, how are you going to reach your CEs via SNMP etc? -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http

Re: [c-nsp] Sup720 Config registry

, but rebooting would go into rommon). To fix it, I would simply do a conf-reg 0x2102 and wr in regular config mode, which seemed to set this conf-reg on all modules, making the problem go away. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ cisco

Re: [c-nsp] mpls ldp discovery transport-address

MPLS list regarding the fact that I couldn't figure out where in the standard it was said what address should be used where, but I received no reply so I am still none the wiser how it should work so I know what vendor to tell to go fix their stuff. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL

Re: [c-nsp] c7604 starter kit

, get a used Cisco 12000, it'll take you into the gigabits/s realm quite cheaply, then when you're past that, go for 7600. 7600 makes a lot of sense if you're ethernet only, the SONET/SDH interfaces are quite pricey due to the need for SIP/SPAs. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL

Re: [c-nsp] BGP Next-hope convergance

will be able to reach 0-2 second convergence time... -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail

Re: [c-nsp] BGP Next-hope convergance

sources. So make RD:s unique per PE, and of course make RTs identical within the VPN. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive

Re: [c-nsp] BGP Next-hope convergance

RDs, there little downside apart from a bit higher memory usage. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] 7206vxr npe300 throughput

of headroom to do DS3. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ZX and HP LH

. Receivers are wideband and will take both 1310 and 1550nm light. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ZX and HP LH

unsupported in it. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Giants and mtu-size

bugs where all jumbos are counted as giants in interface counters, you might want to check the bug database. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco

Re: [c-nsp] 10G MMF on 12k ?

run it over a 1 meter cable. Also, I would be very surprised if cisco didn't support SR in that module, where did you get that information? whats everyone doing with 10G on the 12k out there ? For 10GE on 12k, I'd say the SIP-601 + SPA1x10GE-L-V2 is the best way to go. -- Mikael

Re: [c-nsp] 10G MMF on 12k ?

, but I guess that if you standardise on MM within site (we use SM everywhere) I guess this might be a hassle. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo

Re: [c-nsp] OIR in 6500/7600

. (The interfaces are configured with bfd interval 100 min_rx 100 multiplier 3.) As far as I know, bfd timers so low aren't supported in SXF, you have to go to SRB to get those. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ cisco-nsp mailing list

Re: [c-nsp] Multiple Ethernet links for redundancy

etherchannel load sharing on 7200 and 7500. If it's of interest, email me offline and I'll look into it tomorrow. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo

Re: [c-nsp] OIR in 6500/7600

doesn't support nearly as agressive timers as SRB, from the top of my head it was around second failure time (300x3), lower than that wasn't supported. Let's see if someone else here has more information, I don't have it in writing easily accessable. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL

Re: [c-nsp] GEIP or PA-GE

a GEIP (with PA-GE) for $125? I'd say street value of that is more like $500-$600. That's at least what the auctions went for a few months back when I last checked. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] Green Cisco

packing material. At least I've seen cisco ship 20+ of those oversize plastic bags in a single box that wasn't big at all. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] New IPv6 BGP peer on a pure IPv4 network

at CCO http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/ipv6/configuration/guide/12_4/ipv6_12_4_book.pdf which has what you need and much more. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https

Re: [c-nsp] 40Gbps on GSR?

of currently sold, is the two port OC192 mentioned in another post. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http

Re: [c-nsp] bgp weird issue

and iBGP, and to make sure your IGP is preferred over BGP. I'd say this is highly recommended unless you specifically need eBGP to be best. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 7206 - High CPU Utilization

media, doing ip tcp mss-adjust 1300 on the interface where the traffic to encrypt/tunnel is passing unencrypted/untunneled, might help you. Worth a try though, you don't want multiple tunnel/encrypted packets per packet in the VPN. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS VPN Problem - EoS conflict

/received. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] 6509 with ws-x6148 or ws-x6348?

about. So I would be dismissing need because it's a LAN party without knowing more about what scale we're talking. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman

Re: [c-nsp] Equipment Upgrade

/prod_white_paper0900aecd80673385.html describes pretty well the different parts of the 6500/7600 platform when it comes to what does what in it. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https

Re: [c-nsp] QoS with Voice and Video

from starvation of other classes I recommend putting a policer on the priority class anyway. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco switch FLP

thinking it is speaking to a hub that doesn't do autoneg, and it'll detect the 100, but will go to 100/half. There are recent hw from the past 1-2 years that can advertise capabilities even when being fixed, but it has to be configured in another way. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm

Re: [c-nsp] itu/c DWDM

-Optical conversion. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] IOS and 4 byte ASNs

and session teardown) but S13 will have this behaviour changed if I understood correctly (and it's already right in SY8). -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] IOS and 4 byte ASNs

which might get 32bit ASN (I don't have any concrete info though) would be 12.2SR-something or 12.4T. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] 7507s: which image for production? For IPv6?

12.4 mainline should work well, I've used that in lab for IPv6 on 7500 RSP1 and VIP2-50:s. It has DHCPv6-PD etc... -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman

Re: [c-nsp] Real life and worst-case performance of Cisco and Juniper?

the process switching path. If you just want to move packets, RSP720+67xx series line cards will do just fine, plenty of grunt even without DFC. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https

Re: [c-nsp] 15km optics

. This works. Been there done, that plenty of times. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco

Re: [c-nsp] No GRP images for GSR's?

there will be no 12.0(33)S for GRP, just as you stated. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Cat7600/Sup720 and IPv4 vs IPv6 performance

IPv4/IPv6 platform; if I run both protocols is the aggregate traffic limited by the IPv6 specs? No, you can change this, you have 1M total to play with, this is partitioned between L2, L3 (IPv4/v6/MPLS etc). -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se

Re: [c-nsp] Cat7600/Sup720 and IPv4 vs IPv6 performance

nowadays. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] eBGP -- OSPF -- eBGP vs eBGP -- iBGP -- eBGP

the previous version that's floating around as a PDF (you have to do some googling). It basically says the same thing, plus contains a lot of other excellent suggestions. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco

Re: [c-nsp] 12k Full BGP Feed Memory Requirements

free at all times, it's sometimes needed during a re-route. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] atm oam ping ok but ping ip not ok

been that the routers are sending packets with higher bitrate than the ATM network is policing cellrate to. Make sure you have the correct UBR in your routers compared to what the ATM network is policing the PVC to. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se

Re: [c-nsp] IPTV Switch Recommendation

On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Paul Stewart wrote: Which Cisco switches would be recommended to handoff approximately 20 Cat5 drops fed by fiber coming in? 3560/3750 seems to work well for this. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] XENPAK packet loss

. Which indicates a constant BER (bit error rate) which is consistant with CD induced BER. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive

Re: [c-nsp] XENPAK packet loss

? I might be wrong though, I can't get the whole article, google only displays from its cache. Is there a Cisco command to pull up the BER the optic is seeing? No, on GE you can only see it by sending traffic and observing the error counters. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se

Re: [c-nsp] IP SLA accuracy

normally varies by several milliseconds, and sometimes much more than that. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http

Re: [c-nsp] IP SLA accuracy

accuracy, it just moves the decimal point. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Can't ping outside network over T1

you get towards the customer? Do you even get to the 7500? -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] Full BGP feed with DFC3A's

the archives regarding full feed for Sup32. Basically it will cpu-switch traffic to some prefixes. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] Power Upgrade 7600

the smaller one, put in the equivalent other bigger one, check that everything looks ok, then switch back to redundant mode. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman

Re: [c-nsp] Splicing a roll-over cable

to it at the same time). Remember that 19200 serial only goes 10-20 meters in standard form (very approximate, depends on serial hardware etc) http://www.connectworld.net/interface-troubleshooting.html says even less (20 feet). screen -x is a wonderful collaboration tool. -- Mikael

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS MTU / Jumbo frames etc.

recommend: mtu 1546 (or something else) ip mtu 1500 clns mtu 1497 (if you run isis). For a 7200 with FE ports this translates into: mpls mtu 1546 Please see discussion regarding this from ~1 year back. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se

Re: [c-nsp] High CPU usage on 3640

On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, Robert Johnson wrote: Suggestions? Please provide output from show int switching (not tab-completable) to verify that all traffic is cef switched. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list

Re: [c-nsp] BFD + BGP on 7600 SRC or SRD

of bug. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] vlans to customer - good practise / myth to bust !

be good to verify that the one you're using doesn't have this problem. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http

Re: [c-nsp] multipath BGP not balancing equally.

load share on, but if you instead have 10k flows and all of them are low-speed, then the odds of them being equally load shared is much better? -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https

Re: [c-nsp] vlans to customer - good practise / myth to bust !

- custport2 then I'd say you have control. so do you typically use bpdufilter, only allow tagged vlans, not use vtp - and this keeps things under control ? Yes, I'd say so. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS MTU [override] bug 12.4(22)T?

really like a release that supports mpls tracroute. Don't use mpls mtu, instead use mtu, ip mtu and clns mtu in combination instead. http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/97840 -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] Traffic shaping on a Sup32

. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] GSR 12k GRP Images?!?

On Thu, 20 Aug 2009, Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote: Does anyone know what happened to the 12.0S GRP images? The software navigator only shows PRP images. GRP(-B) is end-of-life and considered obsolete. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se

Re: [c-nsp] GSR 12k GRP Images?!?

hardware such as SPA-TENGE-V2 and it has a few more features such as mpls ldp igp sync for ISIS. Generally for the SY train has been early introduction of features, historically MPLS was available there first for instance. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se

Re: [c-nsp] cisco router 2800/3800 serie

/quickreference/routerperformance.pdf You could probably look into the 1841 as well, it should be enough for your 20 megabit/s need. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https

Re: [c-nsp] Application Protocol Performance in low latency envrionments

will create performance problems in real life. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] Large networks

multiple vlans per IP subnet, so you get L2 isolation between customers but you do not waste any IP addresses. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo

  1   2   3   4   5   >