Re: [c-nsp] [External Email] Re: big uptime - what you got ?

2020-02-10 Thread Alex D.

Am 10.02.2020 20:34, schrieb Aaron Gould:

You gotta tell me for reals if you still have cells going through that
box ?


Of course, but i'm not really proud of it...
We still have some legacy ATM-based DSLAMs which at last will be
migrated in the near future.

atm-03#sh atm vp traffic | exclude _0_

Interface VPI  Type   rx-cell-cntstx-cell-cnts
ATM0/0/0  155   PVP 1617074216170742
ATM0/0/1  56PVP   3821416440  1616175059
ATM0/0/3  55PVP   2284738845  3258701319
ATM0/0/3  67PVP   1485515268  3223706467
ATM0/1/0  60PVP   4275386120  2464155772
ATM0/1/0  160   PVP   2959974087  1832732006
ATM1/0/0  57PVP242123401  1760822153
ATM1/0/0  58PVP785803508  3195153964
ATM1/0/0  59PVP480804395   802898023
ATM1/0/0  64PVP   3718629757  1127881370
ATM1/0/0  68PVP130085993   130046761
ATM1/0/0  82PVP   1573546560  1474080793
ATM1/0/1  56PVP   1616175059  3821416440
ATM1/0/1  57PVP   1760822153   236202714
ATM1/0/1  58PVP   3195153964   740660575
ATM1/0/1  59PVP802898023   480765701
ATM1/0/1  64PVP   1127884215  3718547821
ATM1/0/1  66PVP   156172  1150227936
ATM1/0/1  68PVP130046761   130080344
ATM1/0/1  82PVP   1474080793  1573546221
ATM1/0/3  60PVP   2464150498  4275391370
ATM1/0/3  160   PVP   1832731988  2959974105
ATM1/1/0  67PVP   3223706538  1485515594
ATM1/1/1  66PVP   1150227974  1562000721
ATM3/1/3  55PVP   3258701461  2284739876
ATM3/1/3  155   PVP 1617074216170742


Regards,
Alex
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] [External Email] Re: big uptime - what you got ?

2020-02-10 Thread Alex D.

Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
IOS (tm) LS1010 WA4-5 Software (LS1010-WPK2-M), Version 12.1(12c)EY,
EARLY DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
TAC Support: http://www.cisco.com/tac
Copyright (c) 1986-2002 by cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Fri 02-Aug-02 09:13 by eaarmas
Image text-base: 0x60010958, data-base: 0x60F9A000

ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 11.2(1.4.WA3.0) [integ 1.4.WA3.0],
RELEASE SOFTWARE
ROM: LS1010 WA4-5 Software (LS1010-WPK2-M), Version 12.1(12c)EY, EARLY
DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)

atm-03 uptime is 16 years, 43 weeks, 3 days, 8 hours, 34 minutes
System returned to ROM by power-on
System restarted at 12:11:39 MEZ Wed Apr 16 2003
System image file is "bootflash:ls1010-wpk2-mz.121-12c.EY.bin"

cisco LS1010 (R4600) processor with 65536K bytes of memory.

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] Log message / Memory Value

2018-11-15 Thread Alex D.




%PLATFORM-4-ELEMENT_WARNING:Switch 1 R0/0: smand:  1/RP/0: Used Memory value 
91% exceeds warning level 90%
It's a known bug (CSCvd45973). See 
https://quickview.cloudapps.cisco.com/quickview/bug/CSCvd45973

Consider upgrade to e.g. 16.4

Regards,
Alex
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] [j-nsp] MX-80 as a BRAS and as a LAC

2013-10-24 Thread Alex D.

Hi,

how much users do you want to terminate on your MX80 ?
Keep in mind, that there is a limit of 16.000 IFLs. When you plan to use 
hierarchical qos, better go to a bigger platform.


Regards,
Alex


Am 19.10.2013 21:44, schrieb Enoch Nyatoti:

Hello,

I am new to Juniper hence my request. We would like to deploy BRAS  and LAC 
functionality on MX80 routers to existing Cisco NAS and I was wondering if you 
could give me a lead on
how to configure these features in Junos including the relevant PPPoE
interface configuration. The idea is to tunnel some sessions to an LNS 
depending on
the domain name.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-...@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp



___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


[c-nsp] Sample config for C819 4g LTE Router

2013-10-23 Thread Alex D.

Hi,

can anyone provide a sample config for a Cisco 819 LTE Router?
I would like to connect to vodafone LTE in germany. We are using 
Vodafone 3G/UMTS/HSDPA since quite a while and it works like a charm.
Now it try to configure my first 4g router and i miss the necessary PPP 
commands.


Regards,
Alex
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] Prefer (outbound) certain bgp peer for AS or subnet ?

2013-10-16 Thread Alex D.

Hi,
with local-pref you can control outgoing traffic for a specific 
destination.
Prefer one of your upstreams based on the source of traffic, you have to 
use policy-based routing.

Regards,
Alex
Am 16.10.2013 03:49, schrieb CiscoNSP List:

Thanks for everyone's responses - Would the following work (Prefer upstream B 
egress for the subnet in question)?

route-map TEST permit 10
  match ip address 100
  set local-preference 200

neighbor UPSTREAM_B route-map TEST in

Cheers.



___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


[c-nsp] Differences between Supervisor Engine 6L-E and 6-E

2013-10-11 Thread Alex D.

Hi guys,
can anyone give me an indication of the exact differences between 
Supervisor Engine 6L-E and Supervisor Engine 6-E for Cat 4506-E

Thanks in advance...
Regards,
Alex
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] Differences between Supervisor Engine 6L-E and 6-E

2013-10-11 Thread Alex D.

Many thanks for the quick reply. This answers all my open questions...
Regards,
Alex

Am 11.10.2013 12:58, schrieb Joshua Morgan:

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps4324/prod_models_comparison.html

On Friday, October 11, 2013, Alex D. wrote:

Hi guys,
can anyone give me an indication of the exact differences between
Supervisor Engine 6L-E and Supervisor Engine 6-E for Cat 4506-E
Thanks in advance...
Regards,
Alex
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/



___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Re: [c-nsp] 10Gigabit Ethernet with Sup6L-E

2012-01-26 Thread Alex D.



Might be some hardware problem with either supervisor (more likely) or
X2 transceivers itself (less likely). Have you tried inserting different
X2 transceivers or using same one in different chassis?

Yes, i tried 4 different subs with 6 different X2 transceivers.

But in the meanwhile, i know that the transceivers are OEM and i suppose 
an incompatibility between them and my hardware.

Funnily enough, all transceivers run in WS-C3560E-12D without problems.

This afternoon, i involved our distributor to provide replacement optics.

Regards,
alex

___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


[c-nsp] 10Gigabit Ethernet with Sup6L-E

2012-01-25 Thread Alex D.

Hi list,

i have a problem with some a WS-C4506-E chassis.
The systems doesn't boot when 1 or both 10G ports are equiped with a X2 
transceiver. All status LEDs remain dark.
When i power-on the supervisor engine without transceivers, system boots 
successful. After reinserting a transceiver, system dies without any 
console output.

If i use TwinGig converters, system works without problems.

Are there any restictions, when using Sup6L-E with 10G ports ?

Regards,
Alex


Switch#sh ver
Cisco IOS Software, Catalyst 4500 L3 Switch Software 
(cat4500e-LANBASE-M), Version 12.2(54)SG, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc3)

Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
Copyright (c) 1986-2010 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Sun 27-Jun-10 08:37 by prod_rel_team
Image text-base: 0x1000, data-base: 0x12823FA8

ROM: 12.2(44r)SG5
Darkside Revision 4, Nexu Revision 9, Fortooine Revision 1.22

Switch uptime is 6 hours, 58 minutes
System returned to ROM by reload
System image file is bootflash:cat4500e-lanbase-mz.122-54.SG.bin
Last reload reason: Unknown reason


cisco WS-C4506-E (MPC8548) processor (revision 9) with 524288K bytes of 
memory.

Processor board ID FOX1443G9E1
MPC8548 CPU at 1GHz, Supervisor 6L-E
Last reset from Reload
1 Virtual Ethernet interface
124 Gigabit Ethernet interfaces
2 Ten Gigabit Ethernet interfaces
511K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.

Configuration register is 0x2101


___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


[c-nsp] Fwd: Re: 10Gigabit Ethernet with Sup6L-E

2012-01-25 Thread Alex D.

dies as in powers off?
faulty hardware, id assume.

No i can eliminate that, because there's the same behaviour on all 4
chassis with Sup6L-E.


maybe config snippets would help.

nothing is configured . I erased startup-config.


as a side note, as of 12.2(53)sg or so -- sup6e and sup6l-e are the
same in terms of functionality

I heard something about a bundle offer of 4506-E with license limited
usage of 10GE ports. Can someone confirm that ?

I think i will first try a different IOS and if that doesn't help, i
will contact TAC

Regards,
Alex
___
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/