Dobbins, Roland rdobb...@arbor.net writes:
On Sep 16, 2012, at 7:05 PM, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
An extra knob, an extra data point to be collected, managed, (and possibly
get wrong) as a proxy for are you sure? [y/N] is a huge step away from
goodness.
Given that the consequences
Dobbins, Roland rdobb...@arbor.net writes:
On Sep 15, 2012, at 7:58 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
The general advice is still to use copp or acls to deprioritise unknown bgp
traffic. Gtsm can help in some situations, particularly at Ixps. Otherwise
md5 is a matter of choice. Some people like
Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de writes:
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 10:16:56AM +0300, Aivars wrote:
Well, 19xx with a proper licensing will work. Everything else depends
on pps and scale.
I want to see that. MPLS over GRE over *IPSEC* with 1 Gbit/sec using
a 19xx (the original poster
I've been reasonably happy with the RB750(G|GL|). The configuration
language is not a Cisco knock-off, but you'll figure it out easily enough.
Sure I have a laundry list of bugs and complaints, but that's the case
for the big name guys as well, and it's easy to exceed expectations
when one is
My experience with Zhone (the MALC and their ONTs) was that it was
quite easy to get working and didn't rely on any kind of proprietary
management software which is always a risk when playing in those
areas. Web configuration UI on the ONT was not the most awesome thing
in the world, but it
While MPLS hides the underlying topology from you, LSD is good for
exposing the metaphysical layer.
;-)
Scott Granados sc...@granados-llc.net writes:
Gee and I thought LSD was for the operator and not a feature. Nice, no
reason the gear shouldn't share in the fun.
:)
On Apr 25, 2012,
Mike mike-cisconspl...@tiedyenetworks.com writes:
Howdy,
I have a 7201 terminating pppoe sessions. I ran the following
command and saw that the max virtual-access interface number was 900,
per below:
sh int virtual-access ?
1-900 Virtual-Access interface number
I am
Victor Sudakov v...@mpeks.tomsk.su writes:
Randy wrote:
Victor wrote:
RS wrote:
Try setting the MTU on the ethernet on the TFTP server to 1400 or so
rather than 1500. That oughta fix the problem, assuming that the tftp
server software is sanely written. If it were TCP
Victor Sudakov v...@mpeks.tomsk.su writes:
I feel that the issue may be in IP fragmentation of some sort which the
dumb PXE TCP/IP stack cannot handle, but a google search did not help.
At least neither an Intel NIC, nor a Realtek NIC nor a GPXE emulation
work.
I'm pretty sure you're on the
or pfsense captive portal (easy to set up, cheaper than mikrotik)
or openwrt + chilispot (somewhat more difficult to set up, even cheaper yet)
---rob
a. rahman isnaini r.sutan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mikrotik with Hotspot Profile... for cheaper fast
Koen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We got 2 WS-C6504-E chassis both with 1 sup 7203CXL and 2
WS-X6748-GE-TX and we see that the asic temperature is always higher
then 40C which is the max operational temperature according to the
docs.
The max operational temperature quoted in documentation is
Deepak Jain [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In the old days, null was handled by CPU (software switched), so lots
of us old-timers got into the habit of using loopback instead of
null. On a modern platform it should make no operational difference
provided you have everything you need set up
Chris Conn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Roy wrote:
A client has a 7206VXR that we are attempting to just upgrade the NPE.
When we replace the NPE-300 with an NPE-400 we get a crash loop during
the boot. The OS we are using is
Cisco IOS Software, 7200 Software (C7200-P-M), Version
The HAR is going to be announced on April Fool's day. My lawyers told
me that as long as I didn't reveal anything about the feature set
(which I find laughable), that I wasn't breaking the NDA, so don't sweat it.
Remember folks, you heard it here first...
Adam Piasecki [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In the past we used Pargain equipment, but it's becoming hard to find that
stuff. So we are starting to look for a new product.
Basically we want to take a T1 from the LEC extended it 1-4miles and have
the receving end connect into our router.
You
Of course, the *real* answer which everyone seems to be overlooking is
that you're terminating PPPoE-over-L2TP per Paul's original mail. The
encap/deencap is the limiting factor, and you're gonna pummel any
known NPE up to and including the NPE-G1 before you hit the link speed
limit with ATM or
; take Cisco's
and your colleagues' numbers with a grain of salt, hedge the numbers
in your model, and come out looking like a hero. :-)
---Rob
- Original Message ---
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] OC3 Throughput
From: Robert E. Seastrom [EMAIL
I have gear in Amsterdam and in San Jose. Pushing log files from
Amsterdam to San Jose through rsync seems to top out at 7Mbps even
Is rsync using ssh to move the data? ssh has its own windowing
issues. There's a high perf fix for that which you should be able
to find via google.
Peter Lothberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have gear in Amsterdam and in San Jose. Pushing log files from
Amsterdam to San Jose through rsync seems to top out at 7Mbps even
Is rsync using ssh to move the data? ssh has its own windowing
issues. There's a high perf fix for that
Try using an access-class on the VTY and a simple acl (number 1-99) instead.
---rob
C and C Dominte [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I am trying to filter SSH access on a router from outside by source and
destination ip address. To be more clear, the
Harold Ritter \(hritter\) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oops. I guess I should have looked at that first ;0) I don't understand
you got assigned a /64. I though the smallest block that could be
assigned to a customer site was /48.
It's actually anywhere from a /64 to a /48, in the ARIN region
Kanagaraj Krishna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
Whats the difference btw both this cards and which would suit an ISP
environment running BGP, IPv6 etc?
The NSE-1 was an oddball card even in its day. End of software
maintenance for it was back in 2005. It has similar performance to
the
Matthew Lange [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Implement blackhole routing on the Internet interface, using the Bogon
list[3]
Actually, I would put static bogon lists in the common but bad
advice section, right there with turning off ICMP (sorry, RobT!).
Why? Well, except for certain networks
Dmitriy Sirant [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Cisco 7204VXR
NPE-G1
What we need from it:
1. Terminate about 50-150 VLANs
2. Terminate about 2500-4000 PPPoE users (at 100Mb, not ADSL)
3. Dynamic access lists and rate-limits for PPPoE users via Radius.
4. 2 x 1000Mbit/s ports to clients with
24 matches
Mail list logo
