Re: [c-nsp] 7609 local vlan significance
On 14 October 2016 at 02:21, Tonywrote: > Hi James, > > Do you have any idea what IOS version you had on your lab 7600 that you put > the config on ? > > > I've got 15.3(3)S6 on the box I'm testing on and whilst the commands exist: Hi Tony, Sory I don't know what IOS it was. Since it was our lab box, it will have had some random IOS on it that someone was testing, I don't have access to that 7600 any more either. It might be worth opening a TAC case. Cheers, James. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 7609 local vlan significance
--- Begin Message --- Hi James, Do you have any idea what IOS version you had on your lab 7600 that you put the config on ? I've got 15.3(3)S6 on the box I'm testing on and whilst the commands exist: Router(config)#interface ? ... vasileftVasiLeft interface vasiright VasiRight interface If I try and configure a VASI interface it doesn't accept it: Router(config)#interface vasileft 1 ^ % Invalid input detected at '^' marker. When I booted the box I'm testing it on is our lab one and it originally had 12.2(33)SRE on it and that version doesn't even had the vasileft/right interface commands (someone else was testing something under that IOS version). Thanks, Tony. From: James Bensley <jwbens...@gmail.com> To: Cisco Network Service Providers <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> Sent: Thursday, 13 October 2016, 0:59 Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7609 local vlan significance On 12 October 2016 at 15:38, Nick Cutting <ncutt...@edgetg.com> wrote: > I thought the same - which IOS devices have you seen it on - > > I have seen it on XE (ASR/CSR/44xx), but not on a fully licensed Sup2T, so > can't imagine it's on a 7600? I saw it on some 7200s, I was looking to move services to a 7600, so I opened a TAC case because the documentation was a bit scarce, discussed it with TAC (I wanted to clarify behaviour with out CFC cards, DFCs, different line card models etc), they said it should work fine. Lobbed the config on a 7600 in the lab (it took the config) but I never got to test it, an ASR9K went in to the DC so the design changed and that wasn't needed anymore. Initially I wrote the config in GNS3 and it worked (so IOS): https://null.53bits.co.uk/index.php?page=vasi-inter-vpn-routing Cheers, James. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ --- End Message --- ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 7609 local vlan significance
On 12 October 2016 at 15:38, Nick Cuttingwrote: > I thought the same - which IOS devices have you seen it on - > > I have seen it on XE (ASR/CSR/44xx), but not on a fully licensed Sup2T, so > can't imagine it's on a 7600? I saw it on some 7200s, I was looking to move services to a 7600, so I opened a TAC case because the documentation was a bit scarce, discussed it with TAC (I wanted to clarify behaviour with out CFC cards, DFCs, different line card models etc), they said it should work fine. Lobbed the config on a 7600 in the lab (it took the config) but I never got to test it, an ASR9K went in to the DC so the design changed and that wasn't needed anymore. Initially I wrote the config in GNS3 and it worked (so IOS): https://null.53bits.co.uk/index.php?page=vasi-inter-vpn-routing Cheers, James. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 7609 local vlan significance
I thought the same - which IOS devices have you seen it on - I have seen it on XE (ASR/CSR/44xx), but not on a fully licensed Sup2T, so can't imagine it's on a 7600? -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of James Bensley Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 4:35 AM To: Cisco Network Service Providers <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7609 local vlan significance On 12 October 2016 at 02:19, Tony <td_mi...@yahoo.com> wrote: > VASI is only on IOS-XE is it not ? No its on IOS, XE and XR. Cheers, James. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 7609 local vlan significance
On 12 October 2016 at 02:19, Tonywrote: > VASI is only on IOS-XE is it not ? No its on IOS, XE and XR. Cheers, James. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 7609 local vlan significance
--- Begin Message --- VASI is only on IOS-XE is it not ? - Original Message - From: James Bensley <jwbens...@gmail.com> To: Cisco Network Service Providers <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> Sent: Tuesday, 11 October 2016, 19:35 Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7609 local vlan significance You can use Vasi interfaces for this. Now sure how this works with 65xx cards specifically but on newer line cards it "just works". If you have DFCs or CFCs and you are looping traffic between VRFs between ports on the same cards or between two ports on different cards you need to check how traffic flows for your cards and the PFC for forwaridng capacity limitations, otherwise it should work. Cheers, James. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ --- End Message --- ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] 7609 local vlan significance
You can use Vasi interfaces for this. Now sure how this works with 65xx cards specifically but on newer line cards it "just works". If you have DFCs or CFCs and you are looping traffic between VRFs between ports on the same cards or between two ports on different cards you need to check how traffic flows for your cards and the PFC for forwaridng capacity limitations, otherwise it should work. Cheers, James. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/