Jared Gillis mailto:jared.a.gil...@gmail.com wrote on Monday, August
10, 2009 21:05:
Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote:
Well.. not sure how large you want to grow your L1 area, but you
could investigate advertise-passive-only to only adveritse the
loopbacks (all customer routes should be in BGP
Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote:
Well.. not sure how large you want to grow your L1 area, but you could
investigate advertise-passive-only to only adveritse the loopbacks
(all customer routes should be in BGP if you need to plan for growth),
and you'll be fine, even with a 1000 nodes in the
Jared Gillis wrote on Thursday, August 06, 2009 20:48:
Daniel Verlouw wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 15:02 -0700, Jared Gillis wrote:
Hm, interesting though. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to pan out
in the lab. The LSPs don't seem to get flooded, but the routes do
get passed through Router A
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 15:02 -0700, Jared Gillis wrote:
Hm, interesting though. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to pan out in the lab.
The LSPs don't seem to get flooded, but the routes do get passed through
Router
A to all the stub routers, regardless of how I set up the mesh-groups.
right.
Daniel Verlouw wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 15:02 -0700, Jared Gillis wrote:
Hm, interesting though. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to pan out in the lab.
The LSPs don't seem to get flooded, but the routes do get passed through
Router
A to all the stub routers, regardless of how I set up the
Here's a thought: If I change Router A to L2 and Routers B and C to L2/L1, I can
put B and C in different areas, but because they are L2/L1, they learn all the
routes to all the areas, just as L2 routes instead of L1 routes.
This gets me each stub router and everything behind it into different
Hello all,
I'm trying to accomplish something with an IS-IS network, and I'm starting to
think it may not be possible, but I'm hoping someone here might have a
suggestion to help.
Basically, what I'm trying to accomplish is to have two routers subtended off an
aggregation router. So, say Router A
On Aug 5, 2009, at 9:57 PM, Jared Gillis wrote:
Basically I'm trying to replicate the concept of an OSPF
totally-stubby-not-so-stubby-area in IS-IS, and I'm starting to
question whether
it can be done. My network design is fairly flexible at this point
(the only
requirements are that it run
Daniel Verlouw wrote:
have a look at IS-IS mesh-groups. Although designed for a different
purpose, it might work. Stick router A and all of its stub routers into
the same L1 area. On router A, put all interfaces towards the stub
routers in the same mesh-group.
Hm, interesting though.
