[c-nsp] BGP extcommunity in the default table

2016-02-12 Thread Mihai Gabriel
Hi, I am trying to advertise a prefix with an extended route-target community in the IPv4 default table with no success. r1#sh route-map test route-map test, permit, sequence 10 Match clauses: Set clauses: extended community RT:65000:65000 Policy routing matches: 0 packets, 0 bytes

Re: [c-nsp] BGP extcommunity in the default table

2016-02-12 Thread Adam Vitkovsky
Hi Mihai, > Mihai Gabriel > Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 10:56 AM > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: [c-nsp] BGP extcommunity in the default table > > Hi, > > I am trying to advertise a prefix with an extended route-target community in > the IPv4 default table with no success. > >

Re: [c-nsp] BGP extcommunity in the default table

2016-02-12 Thread Mihai Gabriel
Hi Adam, I think the community should show up in the local bgp table event without a bgp neighbor configured, like the basic communities. I have already configured the 'send-community' command but the community is not advertised, which is normal because it is not set:) On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at

Re: [c-nsp] BGP extcommunity in the default table

2016-02-12 Thread Mihai Gabriel
Hi Adam, There is no VRF involved in this setup. I don't think I can use export maps in the default VRF. On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Adam Vitkovsky wrote: > Hi Mihai, > > > Mihai Gabriel > > Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 2:43 PM > > Cc:

Re: [c-nsp] BGP extcommunity in the default table

2016-02-12 Thread Adam Vitkovsky
Hi Mihai, > Mihai Gabriel > Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 2:43 PM > Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] BGP extcommunity in the default table > > Hi Adam, > > I think the community should show up in the local bgp table event without a > bgp neighbor configured, like the basic