Hello,
My name is Jordi. I have a strange issue with one of my
ME3600. I have a ME3600 connected to a C7609 via the G0/24 port and
connected to another ME3600 connected via G0/22 port. In the middle of
the connection between the two ME3600 there is a SDH network (Ethernet
over SDH). I have a re
errors on it?
Thanks,
Ramji
From: Waris Sagheer (waris)
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 3:11 PM
To: Jordi Magrané Roig; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Cc: Ramji Vasudevan (ramji)
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ME3600 FCS packet generation issue
Jordi,
Can you please capture the packet? Are there an
sible for you to share the running configuration and also the
traffic profile through the box? Ideal would be to for us to look into the box
when the input errors are happening. Do you think that’s possible should it
happen next time?
Thanks,
Ramji
From: Jordi Magrané Roig [mailto:jord
ject: Re: [c-nsp] ME3600 FCS packet generation issue
>
> On (2014-10-24 10:12 +0200), Jordi Magrané Roig wrote:
>
> Hi Jordi,
>
> > ME3600. I have a ME3600 connected to a C7609 via the G0/24 port and
> > connected to another ME3600 connected via G0/22 port. In the middle
Hello Ytti,
I have checked the Lucent GBE card and the current revision is V02.04.81. The
card is ISA-ES16-2.4
.
Thanks!
> From: luky...@hotmail.com
> To: s...@ytti.fi; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:59:52 +0200
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ME3600 FCS packet generation issue
>
Dear all,
I have an ASR1006 with two RSP2, two ESP20 and two SIP-10. Since last Thursday
11 of december, I see in the logs the following information:
%PLATFORM-4-ELEMENT_WARNING: R0/0: smand: SIP/0: Committed Memory value 96%
exceeds warning level 95%
I have seen the following bug:
https://
Hello,
Lukas and Mark, thanks for the information. I'm planning to upgrade
the device but it will take some weeks. My worry is to check now if the
device has problems.
Somebody knows how I could check if the device is working fine?
Thanks!
> From: mark.ti...@seacom.mu
> To: cisco-nsp@puck.ne
Dear Colleagues,
I'm planning upgrade my ASR1006. I never upgrade this model of router before
and I have a doubt. I have found the ISSU procedure to upgrade the device but
my question is if I can simply put the following command in the configuration:
boot system flash bootflash:NAME-OF-NEW-RELE
ges on the router using the command
install add. Activate the package or packages on the router using the install
activate command. Commit the current set of packages using the install commit
command.
Scott
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 8:16 AM, Jordi Magrané Roig
wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
I'm plan
is. Not all ISP would have this luxury. The small one I
> support occasionally certainly doesn't.
>
> Chuck
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Tinka [mailto:mark.ti...@seacom.mu]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 7:32 AM
> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
&
Dear colleagues,
I have an ASR9001-S with IOS XR 5.1.3. I have configured the router to send the
log messages to a syslog server with the following configuration:
logging trap debugging
logging buffered debugging
logging 10.2.32.254 vrf MGMT severity debugging
logging source-interface Lo20 vrf M
ail and delete all copies. Thank you.
"cisco-nsp"
a écrit sur 2015-01-20 07:32:38 :
> De : Jordi Magrané Roig
> A : "cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net" ,
> Date : 2015-01-20 07:41
> Objet : [c-nsp] ASR9001 doesn't send log messages
> Envoyé par : "
Dear colleagues,
Recently I have enabled a BGP session with the LINX route servers (London). The
problem is that I have noticed that my router is learning routes from the route
server very slow. I have disabled the command "bgp enforce-first-as" in order
to learn the routes and the route-policy
Dear colleagues,
We have fixed this issue by clearing the BGP session on the route server.
Anyway, thanks!
Best regards,
Jordi
> From: jordimagr...@hotmail.com
> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 13:14:12 +0100
> Subject: [c-nsp] ASR9001 issues with route learning from BIR
Dear colleagues,
I have two questions for you.
Does the ME3600 supports L2TPv3 pseudowires? The IOS version 15.4(2) supports
the configuration but the pseudowire doesn't work.
The second question is regarding SIPs and ESP in ASR1006. If I have two ESP20
(active/standby) and 3 SIP10, how many
Dear colleagues,
Thank you very much for your comments. I really appreciate it.
Someone has comments about the other questions regarding the SIP10?
Thank you very much.
Jordi.
> To: luk...@bromirski.net
> From: mark.ti...@seacom.mu
> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 19:52:55 +0200
> Subject: Re: [c-n
Dear colleagues,
I have an ASR1006 with ESP20, RP2 and two SIP10. Recently I have inserted one
SPA 1x10G into one of the SIP10 and I have seen the following log messages:
Apr 22 12:00:53: %IOSXE_OIR-6-INSSPA: SPA inserted in
subslot 1/2
Apr 22 12:01:00: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: SIP1/2: Interface
EOBC1
l.com
>
> Bad SPA or bad SIP. Try moving the SPA to a different slot in the SIP. If it
> comes up that could point to the original slot as faulty. If it doesn't help
> it could be a bad SPA.
>
> - Ed
>
>
>
> On Apr 22, 2015, at 07:27, Jordi Magrané Roig
Dear colleagues,
I have an ASR9000 and I have a BGP session with an IOS device. The output of
the command "show tcp detail pcb" shows the following information:
output omitted
Datagrams (in bytes): MSS 1460, peer MSS 1460, min MSS 1946, max MSS
1946
output omitted
The IOS device is using MSS
1460, min MSS 1946, max MSS 1946
Is the IOS XR device using MSS 1460 or MSS 1946.
Thanks.
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] TCP MSS on IOS XR
> To: jordimagr...@hotmail.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> From: mark.ti...@seacom.mu
> Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 09:05:21 +0200
>
>
>
> On 2
Dear Lukas,
Ok great, thanks for the information.
Best regards,
Jordi,
> From: luky...@hotmail.com
> To: jordimagr...@hotmail.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: [c-nsp] TCP MSS on IOS XR
> Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 11:41:37 +0200
>
> > Dear Colleagues,
> >
> > The IOS XR version is 5.1.
Dear Colleagues,
Recently I have installed one ASR920 and I have configured on 1G interface
one service instance with an outbound policy-map shaping to 30 Mbps. The
problem is that I noticed that the ASR920 has the same microburst issue than
the ME3600. I have tried to adjust the queue-limit in
limit 393 us/ 49152 bytes
(queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
(pkts output/bytes output) 5/324
De: George Giannousopoulos [mailto:ggian...@gmail.com]
Enviado el: lunes, 10 de agosto de 2015 14:06
Para: Jordi Magrané Roig
CC: cisco-nsp
Asunto: Re: [c-nsp] ASR920
Dear colleagues,
I have a doubt regarding the MDT routes in ME3600 platforms. The template shows
the following information:
Switch#sh sdm prefer current
The current License is AdvancedMetroIPAccess
The current template is "applications" template.
Template values:
number of mac table entri
MDT tunnel to this ME3800. But I don't know if in MPLS this architecture
works.
Anybody has any experience with that?
Thanks.
El 21/09/2016 a las 17:14, Adam Vitkovsky escribió:
Hi Jordi,
> Jordi Magrané Roig
> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 3:05 PM
>
> The maximum MDT routes
Hi Adam,
Thanks for your comment. I will try to build a demo lab with some spare ME3600
amd test it.
Has anyone got more ideas?
Regards,
El 26/09/2016 a las 16:22, Adam Vitkovsky escribió:
> On 22/09/2016, 17:36, "cisco-nsp on behalf of Jordi Magrané Roig" nsp-boun...@pu
26 matches
Mail list logo
