Peter Rathlev wrote:
We're mostly running C6k with 12.2SXF and 7200 with 12.4 main, and I
know it's very complicated to give some figures, but do any of you know
of any studies regarding IOS stability in general?
Its a lot like the reliability of hard drives. If it runs for three
weeks it
If you are taking full routes you can do manual traffic engineering
(localpref certain as-paths higher/lower between the two links).
There are also commercial products that will do this automatically
for you (Avaya CNA, Internap FCP etc).
If you have connections to differnt ISPs and cannot
take
Alasdair McWilliam wrote:
Hello,
Apologies if this is a duplicate post, the original message went wrong and
unsure if the list actually forwarded it on or not!
This is a bit of an extension from the original post, but what would be
considered best practice for outbound routing, if you had one
Peter Rathlev wrote:
On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 14:01 -0400, Jared Mauch wrote:
netflow on the 65xx is broken enough i'm surprised it gave you any
data of value.
Hm, I thought it worked okay. Out of curiosity, what should one be
careful about with it, if one's network was dominated by 6500s?
We
I am doing 8 parallel full tables to the same provider on an rsp720
with no issues. You can barely do 6 full tables on a sup720-3bxl.
The limitation is processor memory not tcam.
Here is what 6 looks like with 12.2SXF16:
HeadTotal(b) Used(b) Free(b) Lowest(b)
Jo Rhett wrote:
I've been trying to spec Cisco for an upgrade of our Force10 backbone
for nearly 2 months now. I'm just trying to clarify which platform
Cisco recommends for full routing table/hardware
forwarding/provider-class environments.
Unfortunately every time I get through to the
Phil Mayers wrote:
Kevin Loch wrote:
Unfortunately, Cisco's partners are useless. They propose 6509s
without the DFCs, which we know will fall over.
Well that depends...
The DFC's only do next-hop (tcam) lookups and netflow. All packets are
switched on the centralized PFC. Each line
Grzegorz Janoszka wrote:
Hi,
We have several 6500's, some of them heavily loaded. We use snmp to
graph traffic on all interfaces - just the simplest solution. Since some
time we have had an issue with the interface counters. When the CPU box
is really loaded (usually synchronization of BGP
TJ wrote:
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of David Freedman
And what, prey tell is wrong with /126 on point to point links, you want
to use SLAAC between routers?
Nothing is wrong, per se. It certainly
C and C Dominte wrote:
Thank you for your advice, however, increasing the timers
did not work.
I powered down the active linecards from switch 2
yesterday to see if it stopped the unicast flood, which it did.
Today I increased the mac address syncronisation activity
time to 640 and
This sounds like the unequal multipath is a quirk (feature?)
of sup720 default load sharing behavior. It happens to any multipath
routes (static, ospf, bgp) installed in the FIB:
http://cisco.cluepon.net/index.php/Sup720_load_balancing
shows a different ratios than OP but that might be due to
Jay Hennigan wrote:
What the #$^$...@# is going on with Cisco's download site? It completely
hangs Firefox with some shopping cart java thing. And this is downright
scary: http://www.west.net/~jay/images/cisco-wants-root.png
Enhanced downloads, brought to you by the same people who brought
Jason Lixfeld wrote:
3- There is one device on the network (an ASR1002 running 2.4.0) that is
unable to see the loopback address via OSPF from this 7600 we just
upgraded. It's built an adjacency with the 7600, so it's not an MTU
thing, it just doesnt see the route for it's loopback
The data sheet for the ASR9K-RSP-4G claims 180 gig/slot
fabric. The data sheet for the A9K-8T/4 does not say
what it's fabric bandwidth is. The /4 in the part
number looks suspiciously like it is 2:1 over subscription.
Does anyone know the fabric bandwidth on that card?
The ASR9K data sheets
Does anyone know what this might be, from a routed interface
on SRD3:
15:00:18.774808 00:02:fc:c1:0d:b2 00:00:00:00:02:02, ethertype Unknown
(0x200e), length 78:
0x: 0001 0203 0405 0607 0809 0a0b 0c0d 0e0f
0x0010: 1011 1213 1415 1617 1819 1a1b 1c1d 1e1f
Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists wrote:
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:18:13 +0100, you wrote:
Best to ask these questions of your Cisco account team.
Exactly :)
They say: We don't know. We can't get a definite answer from the BU.
Hopefully they won't screw everyone (again) who forklifted their 6500's
to
I had this problem recently on a sup720, the lithium
battery was dead. Fortunately it was socketed unlike
on many of the sup2's.
- Kevin
Sony Scaria wrote:
Thanks Clinton. My Cisco TAC rep also recommends the same.
Sony.
-Original Message-
From: Clinton Work
Have you tried replacing the lithium battery on the sup2?
Hopefully you have a newer board with a socket.
- Kevin
ambedkar wrote:
Hi, i cleaned the modules of 6509 and reinstalled, it shows
inband gmac link did not come up: reseting the system
System Bootstrap, Version 7.1(1)
Copyright (c)
mdjahangir hossain wrote:
Dear concern:
I faced a problem in cisco SAR-7606 router about netflow.when i enable netflow
, access to this router so slow.it would be nice for me can any one help how
can i enable netflow in cisco 7606 router without this type of problem.
Here the router IOS
Matthew Melbourne wrote:
On looking at this again, it appears that BGP Multipath only works
when the eBGP sessions are terminated on the same box.
The scenario here is two eBGP session to the same ISP, but terminating
on two different customer edge routers (with an iBGP session between
them).
Sharlon Carty wrote:
Hello,
I have a police-map applied to a vlan interface set to 10mbit. Works fine, as long as traffic is routed on the CEF720 48 port module. But the moment traffic is routed on the RSP720, traffic is above the 10mbit.
Is there something on the RSP720 that needs to
Mark Tinka wrote:
On Monday 15 March 2010 03:35:32 am luismi wrote:
I just see it.
Anyone here testing it? :D
I'd stopped tracking any developments in SRC as I thought
that line had met its end.
Just read the release notes... a couple of bug fixes but
nothing that solves my biggest issue
I migrated from a 2500w AC power supplies (running at 120v/1250w) to
2500w DC power supplies without any reboots or problems so
you can mix and match AC/DC supplies of the same rating.
- Kevin
Jason Lixfeld wrote:
As long as the power supply you are installing is exactly the same as the power
Gary T. Giesen wrote:
Is anyone running SRE2 (or 1) in production on their Cisco 7600s? Any
significant gotchas? Currently running SRD4 and I would like to gain
4-byte ASN support..
I might try the SRE train when the latest resolved cveats do not contain
things like router will collapse into a
Sean Granger wrote:
The product listing on this page (
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps5023/prod_models_comparison.html
) shows WS-C3750G-12S as being StackWise+ compatible. This is an older product
and even the literature on the other 3750v2s just references the original
Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
The bus is stalled all the time during the insertion. There is a few
millimeters of insertion length where the bus is stalled. If you're
rapid and firm in the insertion, you get a few tens of milliseconds of
stall. If you do it wrong and the car gets stuck in that
vince anton wrote:
So what happens now is that for this more specific customer prefix, I have a
specific route saying some AS5 nets are preferable via the peering link than
via the direct customer link, and if I want to deliver transit traffic to
my customer, my router would choose the peering
vince anton wrote:
it surprises me that some people seem to be ok with passing transit traffic
over a peering link. I dont understand why you would want to do this, as to
me this seems abuse or misconfiguration (possibly not intentional), and
potentially very expensive, or loss of revenue.
Persio Pucci wrote:
Hi folks,
I am having some problems trying to figure out what could be causing UDP
packets get out-of-sequence on some multicast streams (market data) between
Sao Paulo and New York.
Are there any Juniper M160's in the path of the packets? Those were
notorious for
Cassidy Larson wrote:
Kevin,
I had the exact same problem. We actually swapped out our RSP720 for a
replacement.
Unfortunately, the second one exhibited the same problems. Our third
RSP720 did not, however.
My vendor said he got both of the original two from the same dealer. I
wonder if there
70% seems *really* high an for rsp720. Are you sure it's
not a sup720? The two have vastly different cpu performance
(about 10x it seems). I have several rsp720 with many full
bgp transit feeds + peer routes and my typical cpu usage is
only 10%. What IOS image are you running and what else are
ci...@entrap.de wrote:
Greetings,
I have a 6509 with an X6716-10GE Card equipped with Cisco X2-10GB-LX4 10GE
modules and a Cisco 2960S-48TD-L Switch with two Cisco SFP-10G-LRM
modules.
LX4 and LRM are not compatible. LRM uses a single 1310nm laser,
LX4 uses four lasers around 1310nm and wdm
Mark Mason wrote:
Two of our DC's are about to get their 3rd internet drop. Each ISP connection
has its own edge router. HSRP is running facing on the LAN side. Please see
https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3496562#3496562 for topology and
further discussions. I expect that packets
33 matches
Mail list logo
