At 16:23 14/04/2010 -0500, MrPaul wrote:
By default, BGP chooses one best path among the possible equal-cost paths
that are learned from one AS. However, you can change the maximum number of
parallel equal-cost paths that are allowed. In order to make this change,
include the maximum-paths
On 4/14/10 8:15 PM, Jay Nakamura zeusda...@gmail.com wrote:
If you're email is your AS, then it looks like you have Qwest and a more
local provider.
I love how people on these lists casually deduces someone's AS and
upstream from the mail header and gives more specific advice. Love
it.
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Michael K. Smith mksm...@adhost.com wrote:
On 4/14/10 8:15 PM, Jay Nakamura zeusda...@gmail.com wrote:
If you're email is your AS, then it looks like you have Qwest and a more
local provider.
I love how people on these lists casually deduces someone's AS and
looking at:
It's inbound i'm mostly concerned with. I'm taking full routes from
both providers. Paths to both a relatively equal, so the path with the
lowest ID is winning, causing it to be overloaded.
and:
I've looked into the communities option, but only Qwest supports them, my
other
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 04:43:12PM -0500, MrPaul wrote:
Without knowing all the details the cleanest solution would be to split your
address space in half.
Exactly what is clean about sending two more routes to the global
routing table?
This might be the simple and direct approach, but
Already running bgp bestpath as-path multipath-relax
Chris Gotstein, Sr Network Engineer, UP Logon/Computer Connection UP
http://uplogon.com | +1 906 774 4847 | ch...@uplogon.com
On 4/15/2010 12:22 PM, Anton Kapela wrote:
looking at:
It's inbound i'm mostly concerned
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Chris Gotstein
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 1:04 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] bgp maximum-paths
We are a multi-homed ISP with connections to
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Chris Gotstein ch...@uplogon.com wrote:
We are a multi-homed ISP with connections to 2 different providers (AS
Numbers) Does the bgp maximum-paths 2 command have any effect on load
balancing between the 2 connections since they are different AS's or
does that
Does this seem like a valid way to load balance?
http://ccnalab.net/bgp-routing/bgp-load-sharing-2-isp/
Chris Gotstein, Sr Network Engineer, UP Logon/Computer Connection UP
http://uplogon.com | +1 906 774 4847 | ch...@uplogon.com
On 4/14/2010 4:23 PM, MrPaul wrote:
On Wed,
.
-b
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Chris Gotstein
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 2:26 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] bgp maximum-paths
Does this seem like a valid way to load
Are you wanting to load balance inbound, outbound, or both?
Without knowing all the details the cleanest solution would be to split your
address space in half. Then send one half to provider A and the other half
to provider B. Also send the entire network block to both provider A B
for backup
It's inbound i'm mostly concerned with. I'm taking full routes from
both providers. Paths to both a relatively equal, so the path with the
lowest ID is winning, causing it to be overloaded.
Chris Gotstein, Sr Network Engineer, UP Logon/Computer Connection UP
: Re: [c-nsp] bgp maximum-paths
It's inbound i'm mostly concerned with. I'm taking full routes from
both providers. Paths to both a relatively equal, so the path with the
lowest ID is winning, causing it to be overloaded.
Chris Gotstein, Sr Network Engineer, UP Logon/Computer
On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 16:26 -0500, Chris Gotstein wrote:
Does this seem like a valid way to load balance?
http://ccnalab.net/bgp-routing/bgp-load-sharing-2-isp/
(For the lazy on the list: The document explains prepending your own AS
on an inbound route-map from each provider, thus making the
On 4/14/10 2:48 PM, Chris Gotstein ch...@uplogon.com wrote:
It's inbound i'm mostly concerned with. I'm taking full routes from
both providers. Paths to both a relatively equal, so the path with the
lowest ID is winning, causing it to be overloaded.
Chris Gotstein, Sr
I've looked into the communities option, but only Qwest supports them,
my other provider doesn't support communities at this time. Though the
Qwest link is the one i want to push more traffic to, so maybe i can
just use their communities and see what happens.
On 4/14/2010 7:56 PM, Michael K.
If you're email is your AS, then it looks like you have Qwest and a more
local provider.
I love how people on these lists casually deduces someone's AS and
upstream from the mail header and gives more specific advice. Love
it. :)
___
cisco-nsp
17 matches
Mail list logo
