[cisco-voip] 7921g-w-k9 -> 7921g-a-k9

Hi, Does anyone know how to either: A) Turn a 7921G-W-K9 -> 7291G-A-K9 or B) Disable the 7921G's reliance on country information being advertised via 802.11d It appears the World version needs 802.11d functioning in order to connect to the AP, and the AP in question doesn't support 802.11d

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber/CIPC and QoS

I saw a CiscoLive! session recently that seemed to recommend the ports and access-lists approach. The idea is that you can now specify separate port ranges for audio and video in SIP Profile. The session goes quite in depth and is worth the watch: BRKCOL-2616 - QoS Strategies and Smart Media

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber/CIPC and QoS

I see; while this is by no means a complete solution, it may help. I'm assuming Cisco based soft phones (CIPC, CSF, BOT, TAB ... etc). You may try Trusted Relay Points (set in the device level configuration). This does rely and depend on your media resource architecture and design; i.e. you'll

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber/CIPC and QoS

Only for softphones. Currently most of our servers live on the same LAN as end users, so yeah. Hardphones have their own VLAN so its not as bad. In the future it won't be that way but for the time being it is. Ben Amick Telecom Analyst From: Ryan Huff [mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com] Sent:

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber/CIPC and QoS

Ben, By flat network; I am to assume that there is no layer 2 partition between rtp/signaling and general data traffic? On Jan 3, 2017, at 9:15 PM, Ben Amick > wrote: Yeah, I have the luck of having MPLS right now, and I don't see us going iWAN

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber/CIPC and QoS

Yeah, I have the luck of having MPLS right now, and I don't see us going iWAN for a while for various reasons. QoS on the WAN right now even isn't my issue, it's QoS on the LAN. Right now we have a relatively flat network, and certain segments of our troupe *cough*developers*cough* seems to

[cisco-voip] LiveData enhancements in UCCX 11.0 and 11.5

Hi all, Happy 2017! We just published a Field Notice about LiveData stabilization enhancements done in 11.0(1)SU1 and 11.5(1)ES1. http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/field-notices/642/fn64240.html So, if you are on 11.0 or 11.5, our recommendation is to move to the above-mentioned

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber/CIPC and QoS

It's a shame really ... MPLS is far superior IMO, for many reasons. Call it iWAN, DMVPN, AutoVPN whatever, it is still as Nate says, public Internet. Try getting a 30 or 60 minute SLA with escalation after 15 minutes from a public Comcast or Time Warner/Charter package. On Jan 3, 2017, at

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber/CIPC and QoS

Or take the most approach of do nothing. My personal favorite is to use codecs where QoS matters less, like iLBC, OPUS, etc. So many business are getting rid of the QoS capable WAN and just doing VPNs, even if they have fancy names that make it sound better than public internet. Sent from my

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber/CIPC and QoS

For option 1, using Windows... this can be implemented with Group Policies, taking it out of the hands of end users, and can be associated with specific application executable and/or specific IP address source/destination. - Sam H From: cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber/CIPC and QoS

From what I understand, it's not so much as "software" as it is a plugin for jabber that enables Jabber to send the medianet signaling. I don't believe it's a function of iOS/android Jabber though, but I could be mistaken Ben Amick Telecom Analyst From: Lelio Fulgenzi

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber/CIPC and QoS

good question Ben. i look forward to reading this thread. i've been meaning to read up on mediaNet, and it seems it's more required than not, especially for QoS. are you suggesting (with option 3) that there is software you can install on desktops? what about mobile devices? QoS, both

[cisco-voip] Jabber/CIPC and QoS

So, I know this is an age old question that's debated, but I've been wondering if anyone here has a perspective here in regards to QoS for softphones. Obviously, with hardphones, you usually partition a separate VLAN with AutoQoS/DSCP tags, but that isn't applicable with softphones. I've heard

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM Patch Insight

I would wait for SU2 at this point. It will be soon. From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jeffrey McHugh Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2017 8:53 AM To: Tim Franklin ; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM Patch

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM Patch Insight

11.5(1)SU1 has been stable for me, and only found one bug that is causing a minor problem. An LDAP authenticated administrator logged into the CCMAdmin cannot manage any LDAP associated items, like associating users to the RMCM application user. The work around is to login as a local super user

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM Patch Insight

I believe 11.5 SU 2 is planned for late 1q2017. With SU 3 being sometime in the summer. I also believe the focus of these two SU's are for Jabber IOS compatibility. There is more (NDA) information available in the CCP forums. Lelio --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. Senior Analyst, Network

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM Patch Insight

Just did an SU1 upgrade, no issues reported but look into bug CSCux90747 depending on your esxi versions I would expect SU2 soon as its named in the Expressway 8.9 release notes for some MRA feature preview From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tim Franklin

[cisco-voip] CUCM Patch Insight

Just curious if anyone on this list has any feedback as to the stability of CUCM 11.5(1)SU1. I'm planning my upgrades out and I'm a bit leery to deploy it given that it's been out since November. While that speaks to no large defects to cause a deferral notice I'm also wondering if another SU is

Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX script question

It uploads the WAV file as a prompt so it should be persistent across reboots/upgrades. On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 10:44 PM, Andrew Grech wrote: > Been awhile since I checked, but I have a feeling the directory where that > example emergency script stores it's file is not

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco CER Licensing?

It doesn't keep the calls from flowing but will send the calls out using the Default ERL configuration. You can also now choose which phones are licensed now which is nice. On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 1:14 AM, Travis Dennis wrote: > I recently upgraded a site to 10.x and