Re: [cisco-voip] CISCO PHONES BAT Template.

Since you are coming from a dissimilar system, my advice is to create a phone template in CUCM (located in the phone subsection of the BAT menu of the publisher), per model, and put as much standardized data as you can in the phone template (device pool, CSS, sip profile, number of lines,

[cisco-voip] CISCO PHONES BAT Template.

Does anyone has a good phone BATTING Tamplate? I am converting Avaya phone system to cisco phone system and having issue getting good tamplate. CUCM VERSION: 10.5.2. PHONES MODEL, 7942's, 881's, 8851's and some wireless phones. Anything with good instructions will be appreciate. Thanks Hamu

Re: [cisco-voip] Migrating a Cisco 2901 to a Cisco 4321

What I am trying to express, although perhaps worded ambiguously, is that all your TDM resources are on the NIM and that I don't believe you could share the DSP from the backplane along with the NIM resources, for the purposes of TDM. I would agree that you are correct, in that any unallocated

Re: [cisco-voip] Migrating a Cisco 2901 to a Cisco 4321

What do mean by shareable to the backplane? It is my understanding that unused DSPs on a NIM can be used for conferencing/transcoding/MTP. Sent from my iPhone > On May 12, 2017, at 2:00 PM, Ryan Huff wrote: > > I think that is where my lack of specificity comes into

Re: [cisco-voip] Migrating a Cisco 2901 to a Cisco 4321

I think that is where my lack of specificity comes into play; the NIM conversation I thought I was participating in was an extension of a convo this AM, regarding a T1 PRI, in which those DSP are reserved for TDM only, and not shareable to the backplane or vice a versa. Thanks, Ryan On May

Re: [cisco-voip] Migrating a Cisco 2901 to a Cisco 4321

TDM DSPs on the 4ks have to be on the NIM because there is no shared TDM clocking backplane like there is on the ISRs/ISR G2. Dspfarm stuff can use extra dsps on a NIM and the motherboard DSPs can only be used for dspfarm tasks. Sent from my iPhone > On May 12, 2017, at 1:35 PM, Jose Colon

Re: [cisco-voip] Migrating a Cisco 2901 to a Cisco 4321

I was under the same assumption of why there was a dsp slot on the NIM. I know I read a Cisco doc somewhere that lead me that direction. On May 12, 2017 2:28 PM, "Ryan Huff" wrote: > So this is interesting; I was under the impression the backplane DSP could > not extend to

Re: [cisco-voip] Migrating a Cisco 2901 to a Cisco 4321

So this is interesting; I was under the impression the backplane DSP could not extend to the NIM (and is the fundamental reason, among others, that the NIM has its own DSP) looks like I have a new lab task :). On May 12, 2017, at 3:09 PM, Anthony Holloway

Re: [cisco-voip] Migrating a Cisco 2901 to a Cisco 4321

Rashmi Patel ( rashmika.pa...@zones.com ) - 12:31 PM Q: Does that mean conference resource will be used from NIM DSP not from mother board DSP resources Priority: N/A Dolan Spitler - 12:57 PM A: When it comes to IP services (xcoding, conferencing, MTP) The motherboard DSP can be pooled with the

Re: [cisco-voip] Migrating a Cisco 2901 to a Cisco 4321

I believe that is correct and further noted that you can't share the backplane resource farm to the NIM. The NIM needs its own farm and can be bought pre-installed on the NIM or as a separate SKU. Sent from my iPhone On May 12, 2017, at 2:17 PM, Brian Meade

Re: [cisco-voip] Migrating a Cisco 2901 to a Cisco 4321

My understanding is any dspfarm resources such as conferencing/transcoding use the motherboard resources while the ones on the NIM are just for the voice ports themselves. On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Jose Colon II wrote: > If you will be using DSP's you will need to

Re: [cisco-voip] Migrating a Cisco 2901 to a Cisco 4321

If you will be using DSP's you will need to decided if you will need them on the motherboard or on the T1 NIM. On the motherboard I believe it can only be used for conferencing. You will need them on the NIM for transcoding. On May 12, 2017 6:42 AM, "Ryan Huff" wrote: > T1

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber Screen share over MRA

Hey Ben, Screen capture does use the same mechanics as file sharing; and file sharing (native) does not work over MRA. According to PDI, the GUI Jabber code in the Windows/Mac client allows you to manipulate the "captured" image into the chat window using the cross hair sizing tool

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber Screen share over MRA

Personally, I don’t read that line as that feature. IM-only screen share I believe would imply the RDP-based live presenting instead of the in-call BFCP stream. Screen capture should theoretically be identical to the file transfer feature, so the fact that it doesn’t work is very strange. Can

Re: [cisco-voip] Migrating a Cisco 2901 to a Cisco 4321

T1 PRI commands are substantially different if that is in play. Sent from my iPhone On May 12, 2017, at 7:35 AM, Matthew Loraditch > wrote: The vast majority of commands are the same. Netflow stuff is changed

[cisco-voip] Jabber Screen share over MRA

The native screen capture in the Jabber client does not work and is not supported over MRA (internal or WebEx Messenger IM Jabber works fine). I believe it is actually covered by the same Expressway caveat that states native P2P file sharing won't work over MRA. By using MFT (Managed File

Re: [cisco-voip] Migrating a Cisco 2901 to a Cisco 4321

The vast majority of commands are the same. Netflow stuff is changed completely if you use that. Outside of updating interface names, most of our templates just worked. Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R, CCDA Network Engineer Direct Voice: 443.541.1518

[cisco-voip] Migrating a Cisco 2901 to a Cisco 4321

We have a base config we use for building our 2901/11's . Will this work on the 4321 or do I have to start from scratch. Thanks Norm Nicholson Telecom Analyst City of Kitchener (519) 741-2200 x 7000 ___ cisco-voip mailing list