We use Extension Mobility exclusively on CUCM 12.5...
We just started replacing our 7965s with 8865s and 8800 sidecars...
However, if you log into the phone and you mix and match lines and speed
dials, none of your lines or speed dials show up on the sidecar.
If you are straight speed-dials or
vices
>
> University at Buffalo Information Technology (UBIT)
>
> 243 Computing Center, Buffalo, NY 14260
>
> [image: contact_line]
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip *On Behalf Of
> *Jonathan
> Charles
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 12, 2022 5:10 PM
> *To:* cisco-voip@p
Howdy!
We are seeing an error on our Expressway E nodes right after we form a
cluster.
The cluster is up and fully operational, however, we get:
Peer Not Responding
A peer address for the LocalZone local zone is down and unreachable.
It then tells you to check the zones page and verify the
We are migrating CUACA from Windows 2012 to 2016 (CUACA 12.0.5)...
When running the database wizard, during CUACA install (after restoring
databases), the system appears to be hanging on 'Creating Logging DB'...
like over an hour.
The amount of time spent on the Config DB was like 4 minutes...
initializing the databases...
Jonathan
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 2:49 PM Jonathan Charles wrote:
> We are migrating CUACA from Windows 2012 to 2016 (CUACA 12.0.5)...
>
> When running the database wizard, during CUACA install (after restoring
> databases), the system appears t
Found it... CSCwb54015
Thanks!
On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 8:44 AM Jonathan Charles wrote:
> Thanks... do you happen to have to bug ID so I can track it?
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 2:22 AM Bernhard Albler
> wrote:
>
>> This is a bug in 42.4
&g
Thanks... do you happen to have to bug ID so I can track it?
Jonathan
On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 2:22 AM Bernhard Albler
wrote:
> This is a bug in 42.4
> Expect a fix to roll out soon
>
> On Thu 14. Apr 2022 at 16:03, Jonathan Charles wrote:
>
>> We are seeing a strange
We are seeing a strange issue with the Webex Softclient connected to on
prem UCM (12.5)... when a call comes in for your pickup group, it says
'Calls Available for Pickup' with no calling notification of who was called
or who is calling.
We have the alert set up for the pickup group... how do we
(or more)”
>
>
>
> “But no one else is saying they have to rebuild servers”
>
>
>
> “Yeah, it’s another one of those special requirements”
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Nick Russo
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 22, 2022 4:07 PM
> *To:* Lelio Fulgenzi ; Jonath
Only on the CLI...
WARNING: Ungraceful shutdown detected - A rebuild of this node is highly
recommended to ensure no negative impact(such as configuration or file
system corruption). For rebuild instructions, see the installation guide.
The bugs suggest it should only be on 12.5 and early...
an
> hard set the actual ELIN on your outbound route patterns.
>
> It makes exporting PS-ALI info from CER not work but I don't see that used
> much anyways.
>
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 11:13 AM Jonathan Charles
> wrote:
>
>> We currently have offices throughout West
We currently have offices throughout Western Europe and each site currently
has a PRI/T1-CAS/Analog nightmare...
We are implementing centralized SIP (ATT) out of London and we need to make
sure 112/999 calls get directed to the proper nation's PSAP.
We would also like to support callback.
So,
Both internal and external, multiple users, multiple locations
We are seeing call drops, and the only things the logs (on the Expressway
E's) show is a Bye coming from CUCM.
tvcs: Event="Request Received" Service="SIP" Src-ip="10.1.28.210"
Src-port="25845" Dst-ip="10.2.9.165" Dst-port="7001"
I am running into a similar issue... did you find a solution?
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 7:50 AM Matthew Huff wrote:
> We are just starting to roll out our Cisco 8800 series phones via MRA, and
> have run into a small problem. As is common with residential ISPs when they
> do a firmware update,
PM Jonathan Charles wrote:
> I asked TAC for it and they just sent me the CAPF doco...
>
> However, I found:
>
> https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/expressway/config_guide/X12-7/exwy_b_mra-deployment/exwy_m_provisioning-mra-devices.html
>
> [image: image.
to be in there...
Jonathan
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 4:49 PM Brian V wrote:
> @Jonathan Charles one very interesting thing you
> mentioned
> " *Phone-Edge-Trust uploads the certs to the Cisco Cloud, so when the
> phone gets the activation code it downloads those certs into its trust
&
, if you see TLS error or Invalid CA in the PCAP, it is
worth a shot to upload the E's external cert chain to the Pub.
Jonathan
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 4:57 PM Jonathan Charles wrote:
> Yes, they will, the Expressway E was designed around an ACME cert and
> Let's Encrypt is super free.
>
gt;
>>
>>
>> *Office: 914-460-4039*
>>
>> *mh...@ox.com | **www.ox.com <http://www.ox.com>*
>>
>>
>> *.......*
>
.com | **www.ox.com <http://www.ox.com>*
>
>
> *...*
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip *On Behalf Of
> *Jonathan
> Charles
> *Sent:* Thursday, November 11, 2021 11:10 AM
> *To:* Brian Meade
> *Cc:* cisco-voip voyp list
ng enabled under the MRA config on the
> Expressway-C?
>
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2021, 5:30 PM Jonathan Charles wrote:
>
>> So, I set up activation code MRA for an 8845 (lab first)...
>>
>> Cloud onboarding worked, got an activation code, tried it out...
>>
>>
So, I set up activation code MRA for an 8845 (lab first)...
Cloud onboarding worked, got an activation code, tried it out...
Phone kicks back 'check internet connectivtity' and on the status on the
phone says:
GDS Handshake Succeeded
A TLS connection failed...
GDS is Cisco's cloud onboarding
Smith wrote:
>
>> Awesome hey :)
>>
>> When I did it - I don't think UCCX was an option.
>> Will be great if it is now.. but I haven't had a look for a while.
>> Will check it out.
>> Let us know if you get it going.
>>
>>
>> O
anybody.
>
>
>
> Did my account team get that wrong?
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip *On Behalf Of
> *Jonathan
> Charles
> *Sent:* Friday, October 22, 2021 11:11 AM
> *To:* Anthony Holloway
> *Cc:* cisco-voip voyp list
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Webex
Just had my first TAC case with it... along with Cisco Intersight, TAC
responded that they were pulling logs from UCS and CUCM and I didn't have
to do anything at all... now, if I could just get it to talk to UCCX...
Jonathan
On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 11:39 PM Anthony Holloway <
So, the doco for connecting the Webex Serviceability Connector to the UCCX
says the following:
For Cisco Unified Communications Manager, IM and Presence Service, UCCX,
and other VOS (Voice Operating System) products:
1.
From Cisco Unified CM Administration on your publisher node, go to
c/ )
> we will reconcile drivers accordingly.
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip *On Behalf Of *Kent
> Roberts
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 14, 2021 3:01 PM
> *To:* Jonathan Charles
> *Cc:* cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Vmware 6.5 Vulnerability...
>
&
This vulnerability from VMware...
https://www.vmware.com/security/advisories/VMSA-2021-0014.html
Trying to find patches for our C240M4S2s running ESXI 6.5 13932383 and
Cisco's latest build is 5310538...
Wondering if Cisco supports direct Vmware patching to the fixed version of
180715574...
You know the rule, reboot three times.
On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 6:13 PM Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
>
> Hey, that’s great news! A reboot for a solution is inevitable possibility.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Sep 17, 2021, at 6:22 PM, Jonathan Charles wrote:
>
>
>
>
of us.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Sep 17, 2021, at 3:18 PM, Jonathan Charles wrote:
>
>
>
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the University of Guelph.
> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and
> know the content is s
d this comes up using timing from VMWare, mixed sources etc.
>
>
>
> With ADFS the property is NotBeforeSkew, which you can give a minute or
> whatever you’re comfortable with, which should alleviate this issue.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
>
>
> Adam Pawlowski
>
>
&g
-
SAML2Utils.checkConditions: NotBefore Condition = Wed Sep 15 21:06:26 UTC
2021
2021-09-15 16:06:26,226 DEBUG [http-nio-81-exec-4] fappend.SamlLogger -
SAML2Utils.checkConditions: The assertion does not meet NotOnOrAfter or
NotBefore condition.
On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 8:00 AM Jonathan Charles wrote
ps://twitter.com/heliontech>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/helion-technologies>
> --
> *From:* cisco-voip on behalf of
> Lelio Fulgenzi
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 16, 2021 4:32:12 PM
> *To:* Jonathan Charles ; Benjamin Turner <
>
in M. Turner
> --
> *From:* cisco-voip on behalf of
> Jonathan Charles
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 16, 2021 4:56:48 PM
> *To:* cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] Error Processing SAML Response
>
> So, users are randomly getting the above error when logg
So, users are randomly getting the above error when logging into CUCM
UCMUser or CUC Inbox... we are also getting it using AD credentials into
admin pages for CUCM/CUC/etc.
For a user, it will work find repeatedly, then you will get the error,
close your browser, and reopen, still get the error
n/us/td/docs/unified_computing/ucs/release/notes/UCS-Tools-ESXi-RN.html
>
> Short version, if you're using Intersight, this is how it's pulling HCL
> data and the OS/driver versions. There's also links to the newest release
> for each version of ESXi.
>
> Jeremy
> On 9/13/2021 3:44 PM, Jo
ame
> upgrade.
>
>
>
> *From: *Ryan Huff
> *Sent: *13 September 2021 20:53
> *To: *Jonathan Charles ; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> *Subject: *Re: [cisco-voip] Error upgrade UCS server to ESXi 6.7
>
>
>
> It’s possible the vibs aren’t in use, making this a h
or blow up the box...
I did an audit of our UCS C240s and this version of UCS-tools is installed
everywhere, so I am expecting to get the same error when I upgrade those.
Thanks!
Jonathan Charles
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
| *presidio.com* <http://www.presidio.com/>
> 5025 Bradenton Ave, Suite B, Dublin, OH 43017
> D: *+1.419.214.1415* <+1.419.214.1415> | C: *+1.419.706.0259*
> <+1.419.706.0259> | *tschlotte...@presidio.com*
>
> <http://www.presidio.com/>
>
>
>
>
&g
https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCvx82644
Just want to get some verification here that this only affects M5 B-series
server blades and NOT C-series?
>From the bug:
Conditions:
This affects M5 B-series server CIMCs, all M4 and earlier B-series server
CIMCs are not affected.
We
t; It is in PCD 14
>
>
> https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/pcdadmin/14/cucm_b_pcd-admin-guide-1401.pdf
>
> Hopefully the omission in 12.6 is sufficient and inclusion in 14 is all
> you need.
>
> On Aug 5, 2021, at 16:52, Jonathan Charles wrote:
>
>
Is there documentation that you need PCD 14 to upgrade to CSR 14 (for
CER/CUC/CUCM)?
I know this seems obvious, but I am being asked to prove it before I
upgrade PCD.
Jonathan
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
ally reregister.
If we put one of the 4 Expressways in maintenance mode, it fails over
automatically.
How do we achieve automatic failover for MRA?
Jonathan
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 3:17 PM Jonathan Charles wrote:
> I mean an outbound flow... offnet Jabber calls PSTN... I need it to go to
>
d flow.
>
> The traversal client cluster (the CS) should know about all the peers in
> the traversal server cluster (the Es).
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jan 29, 2020, at 15:21, Jonathan Charles wrote:
>
>
> OK, maybe I am misunderstanding... I have th E's paired
uoguelph.ca
>
>
>
> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook
>
>
>
> [image: University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]
>
> On Jan 28, 2020, at 8:49 PM, Jonathan Charles wrote:
>
> We have two pairs of Expressway clu
We have two pairs of Expressway clusters (C/E) at two different locations
(primary and DR)...
The cluster is up, however, we want to make sure that we are in
Active/Standby.
Currently, we have one of our SRV records for collab-edge set at 5 (the
backup is at 10) with the same weight.
The
ave you
> engaged the carrier?
>
> Maybe the gateway is actually working just fine?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Dec 19, 2019, at 11:01, Jonathan Charles wrote:
>
>
> It is a T1 CAS and the controller is up with no errors it is 1977
> over there.
>
>
It is a T1 CAS and the controller is up with no errors it is 1977
over there.
Jonathan
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 3:03 AM daniele visaggio
wrote:
> can you do a "show isdn status" ?
>
> Is the t1 completely up?
>
> Il giorno gio 19 dic 2019 alle ore 03:14
gt; “no mgcp / mgcp” has been known to fix weird things; I assume you’ve tried
> that though.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Dec 18, 2019, at 19:59, Jonathan Charles wrote:
>
>
> Inbound call (to x2475) on an MGCP T1-CAS E Wink
>
> Gateway is a 4331 running 16.06.02.S
Inbound call (to x2475) on an MGCP T1-CAS E Wink
Gateway is a 4331 running 16.06.02.SPA, CCM is 11.5.1.2900-21
Get dead air and see no MGCP setup message to CCM, after 60 seconds, call
times out (debug vpm signal and mgcp packet, below):
006469: Dec 18 18:23:38.037: htsp_dsp_message:
*mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com*
> [image: Helion Technologies] <http://www.heliontechnologies.com/>
> [image: Facebook] <https://facebook.com/heliontech>
> [image: Twitter] <https://twitter.com/heliontech>
> [image: LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/
Are they compatible?
We are upgrading TMS from 15.5 to 15.9 tonight, but may not be able to do
TMSXE at the same time.
I can't find clear compatibility information... the docs say 5.5 goes with
15.5 and 5.9 with 15.9... but no cross compatibility.
Jonathan
convergence is
> very quick and is usually tolerated in the same way that a "brief moment of
> packet loss" is tolerated.
>
> Again, evaluate whether nic teaming is a material requirement in your
> environment, but if it is not, I'd consider un-teaming and just going to
> active/st
Would you recommend changing it to Originating Port ID?
Jonathan
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 6:25 PM Ryan Huff wrote:
> I would expect the same behavior from PAgP with ESXi.
>
> -Ryan
>
> On Nov 27, 2019, at 19:19, Jonathan Charles wrote:
>
>
> They are channel
control servers listed in the phone’s configuration (xml) file.
>
> The delayed call setup could be due to the call traversing an
> unexpected/unoptimized network path, due to disruption in it’s connection
> to its preferred call control server.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ryan
>
> On
ll
> the call control servers listed in the phone’s configuration (xml) file.
>
> The delayed call setup could be due to the call traversing an
> unexpected/unoptimized network path, due to disruption in it’s connection
> to its preferred call control server.
>
> T
Customer has a two C220-M4S's with CUCM 11.5... both C-series are connected
to the same 4-stack 3850 (port channel, mode on)
Customer is reporting Preservation Mode kicking in on the LAN and some
calls taking a long time to setup.
Currently, VMware is set to Route based on IP Hash with PAgP
ions-keepalive
>
> show dial-peer voice summary
>
> Feel free to redact what you need to, in terms of IPs or
> usernames/passwords. I am only looking for the features and settings for
> retries and keepalives.
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 9:26 PM Jonathan Charles
> wrote:
&
Using session server groups on outbound dial-peers and it does not appear
to be failing over:
voice class server-group 1
no ipv4 172.31.125.43 preference 2
no ipv4 172.31.120.43
description Verizon SIP
!
We had the 172.31.20.43 go down (no response to invites) and we did NOT
failover to the
So, just an FYI, with MRA down, we rolled back to 8.7.3... going to try
this again next Friday...
Should we try going to an intermediate version first, say, 8.11 or
something?
Jonathan
On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 6:15 PM Jonathan Charles wrote:
> Loaded the local certs... no
ecognized in the trust.
>
> Also, make sure to do a full reboot of the Expressway node after adding
> certs into the truststore (again, you shouldn’t have to do that but I’ve
> seen this work before).
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Nov 17, 2019, at 18:58, Jonathan Charles wro
When I try to refresh the IMP nodes, I get Failed: Unable to communicate
with [[IMPNODE] CryptoError: Decryption failure.
On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 5:54 PM Jonathan Charles wrote:
> I re-uploaded the root and intermediate CA certificate... still get the
> same error...
>
> I also
2019, at 18:36, Jonathan Charles wrote:
>
>
> Yep, we are running into clustering issues...
>
> Getting *Inactive: (Remote host is reachable but connection is not
> established. Either refresh this page, or check the credentials.)*
>
> For IMP connection, so MRA
This,
https://community.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications/expressway-c-cannot-connect-to-imp/td-p/2974926
seems
to suggest a fix, but it isn't doing anything
J
On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 5:35 PM Jonathan Charles wrote:
> Yep, we are running into clustering issues...
>
> Getting
, Nov 15, 2019 at 3:28 PM Matt Jacobson
> wrote:
>
>> If that is the case, then I would double check that it is supported. In
>> the release notes there is a chart for supported platforms based on
>> serial numbers. If it is a legacy Tandberg box, then I suspect 12.x may not
>>
them up a notch, it
> ends up breaking XMPP or something.
>
>
>
> Adam
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip *On Behalf Of
> *Jonathan
> Charles
> *Sent:* Friday, November 15, 2019 11:59 AM
> *To:* Ryan Huff
> *Cc:* cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-vo
versity of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]
>
>
>
> *From:* Jonathan Charles
> *Sent:* Friday, November 15, 2019 12:00 PM
> *To:* Lelio Fulgenzi
> *Cc:* Matthew Loraditch ;
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Webex Directory Connecto
;
>
> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook
>
>
>
> [image: University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]
>
>
>
> *From:* Jonathan Charles
> *Sent:* Friday, November 15, 2019 10:56 AM
> *To:* Lelio Fulgenzi
> *Cc
way trusts
>
> Beyond that, just pay attention to the caveats list in the upgrade doc for
> your version of 12.5.x (12.5.4 is the latest I think).
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ryan
>
> --
> *From:* cisco-voip on behalf of
> Jonathan Charles
> *Sent:*
Can we just upgrade directly or do we need to go to an intermediary version
first?
Also, any gotchas besides new certificates?
Jonathan
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
ce & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON |
> N1G 2W1
>
> 519-824-4120 Ext. 56354 | le...@uoguelph.ca
>
>
>
> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook
>
>
>
> [image: University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline
ww.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook
>
>
>
> [image: University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip *On Behalf Of *Matthew
> Loraditch
> *Sent:* Monday, November 11, 2019 1:37 PM
> *To:* Jonathan Charles ; c
Also, we have not yet enabled SSO, so unchecking the welcome email is not
an option
Jonathan
On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 12:33 PM Jonathan Charles wrote:
> Have a customer with 20K+ users, want to enable directory
> synchronization, but am concerned it is going to send 20K emails to 15K
&
Have a customer with 20K+ users, want to enable directory synchronization,
but am concerned it is going to send 20K emails to 15K users who will not
be using Webex.
How do I avoid this?
Also, if all of them are licensed via template, how do we ensure users who
never log in will not use a
>
>
>
> *From:* Brian Meade
> *Sent:* Friday, August 9, 2019 2:43 PM
> *To:* Lelio Fulgenzi
> *Cc:* Jonathan Charles ; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Webex Control Hub and Room Kit Mailboxes
>
>
>
> So that still makes sense though.
ailbox. So you can just use the same and it will look for any
> meetings on the calendar. O365/Exchange should be the side setup to
> auto-respond to the invites.
>
> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 1:03 PM Jonathan Charles wrote:
>
>> Customer asked a question and I am
Customer asked a question and I am curious what best practices are...
Customer has room resources in O365 and is adding video systems to those
rooms...
Should the video units get a separate calendar room room resource, or
should it share the same room resource email ID in Webex Control Hub?
My
ogies.com*
> [image: Helion Technologies] <http://www.heliontechnologies.com/>
> [image: Facebook] <https://facebook.com/heliontech>
> [image: Twitter] <https://twitter.com/heliontech>
> [image: LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/helion-technologies>
>
ologies] <http://www.heliontechnologies.com/>
> [image: Facebook] <https://facebook.com/heliontech>
> [image: Twitter] <https://twitter.com/heliontech>
> [image: LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/helion-technologies>
> *From:* cisco-voip *On Behalf
Have a customer with CUCM 10.5 and they want to register video endpoints
locally to CCM.
They do not have TMS, but they want OBTP... can we just install an
Expressway Connector and use the Webex Hybrid cloud to use @webex and @meet
to get OBTP without TMS?
Jonathan
Is it supported? Docs used to say 10.5 now, they say 11.5...
The Cisco Spark-RD device doesn't exist in 10.5... so curious if it is
supported...
Jonathan
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
OK, I know it is weird to respond to your own email... but...
The blocking of toll fraud is via MTLS on port 5062 with Cisco... we create
an MTLS session first before accepting the invite.
Jonathan
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 4:20 PM Jonathan Charles wrote:
> Enabling Cisco hybrid c
@domian.com
>> - Example: 9...@domain.com
>>
>>
>>- ^[0-9,a-z,A-Z]{0,6}$
>> - The first 0-6 characters are made up of alphanumerics 0-9 and/or
>> upper/lower case letter and do not exceed the 6th character
>> - Example: 1000
>>
ca%2Fccs=02%7C01%7C%7C5b817b962f3e419f017508d6d986a8fe%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C636935569711612281=C%2BV4UMQtv6O8a3zQaVlcrhQL3TG2J06nNShR0ZEQfQ0%3D=0>
> |
> @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook
>
>
>
> [image: University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve
Enabling Cisco hybrid call and routing calls to the PSTN using local
gateway (via Expressway C/E pair).
What search rules do we need on the E and C?
How do we prevent toll fraud if we have E.164 patterns inbound on our
Expressways?
Am I being paranoid?
Jonathan
ion Technologies] <http://www.heliontechnologies.com/>
> [image: Facebook] <https://facebook.com/heliontech>
> [image: Twitter] <https://twitter.com/heliontech>
> [image: LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/helion-technologies>
> ---
We have a 12.5 NFR kit and we are trying to upgrade our 8.11.4 VCSs (in our
lab)... and it is saying our release key is invalid...
How do you get new release keys? I have a giant pile of PAKs and no idea
which one to fulfill for this...
Jonathan
___
Found this... it worked really well
https://www.adhdtech.com/uctools.html
Jonathan
On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 4:25 PM Jonathan Charles wrote:
> Any way to open them and browse the files to extract data from them? I
> have the password...
>
>
Any way to open them and browse the files to extract data from them? I have
the password...
Jonathan
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
g else like MRA again…
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Jonathan Charles
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 20, 2018 12:16 PM
> *To:* Patrick Robitaille
> *Cc:* Lelio Fulgenzi ; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Exoressway 8.11 or 8.10.4 upgrade...
>
>
>
de the files.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Lelio Fulgenzi
> *Sent:* Friday, November 9, 2018 11:23 AM
> *To:* Patrick Robitaille ; Jonathan Charles <
> jonv...@gmail.com>
> *Cc:* cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* RE: [cisco-voip] Exoressway 8.11 or 8.10.4 upgrade...
&
es a different directory source by default compared to mobiles
> and MRA.
>
>
>
> Hope this helps you to look at the directory configuration or DNS?
>
>
>
> Cheers
> Dana
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip *On Behalf Of
> *Jonathan
> Cha
Jabber for iPhone offnet, thru Expressway, Directory Services work fine.
Jabber for iPhone ONnet, Directory Services fail.
Jabber for Windows and Android on net work fine.
Everything works fine thru Expressway...
Any ideas?
Jonathan
___
cisco-voip
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip *On Behalf Of *Erick
> Bergquist
> *Sent:* Thursday, November 8, 2018 10:20 PM
> *To:* Jonathan Charles
> *Cc:* cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Exoressway 8.11 or 8.10.4 upgrade...
>
>
>
> There is a secur
Where did Cisco move the upgrade tarballs?
The main link now only has language packs for 8.10 and above...
Do they have to be ordered via PUT?
https://software.cisco.com/download/home/286255326/type/280886992/release/X8.11.0
Jonathan
___
cisco-voip
OK, the solution was to use Win7 32-bit COBRAS worked fine...
Jonathan
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 1:21 PM Jonathan Charles wrote:
> Cool... but my problem is it fails uploading the test WAV and
> terminates... I was able to skip it on the export (all other wav files
> expo
r changes.
>
> *The Unity Connection SMTP Server configuration page should look like this
> at the bottom:*
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 12:25 PM Jonathan Charles
> wrote:
>
>> OK, i am curious... what is message shuttle?
>>
>> I am not even at the point where I am impor
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net
> ] *On Behalf Of *Jonathan Charles
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 5, 2018 12:39 PM
> *To:* cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] COBRAS Import fail...
>
>
>
> *EXTERNAL EMAIL
ommunity.cisco.com/t5/unified-communications/cobras-import-for-connections-7-x-error/td-p/2469514
>
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 11:39 AM Jonathan Charles
> wrote:
>
>> [Thread 001], [18/09/05 09:22:55], Starting restore process - pre restore
>> checks
>> [Thread 001]
t;
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Tommy
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf
> Of *Jonathan Charles
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 5, 2018 12:39 PM
> *To:* cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] COBRAS Import fail...
[Thread 001], [18/09/05 09:22:55], Starting restore process - pre restore
checks
[Thread 001], [18/09/05 09:22:55], Checking for stream file
connectivity for WAV file restores.
[Thread 001], [18/09/05 09:22:57], (error) in UploadWAVFile on
ConnectionWAVFiles:The underlying connection was
1 - 100 of 250 matches
Mail list logo
