as a softphone to
replace some hardware IP phones.
We now use Lync as IMP Client (no enterprise voice) with RCC to IP phones.
Regards Reto
Am Donnerstag, 22. Januar 2015 schrieb Josh Warcop :
Jabber is a CTI application and RCC controls phones. Your use case would be
somewhat skewed
Sparkle: The
update is improperly signed.
Previous updates (from 10.5.0 to 10.5.1) have worked fine ...
Cheers
Sebastian
--On 27. Januar 2015 14:49:47 -0500 Josh Warcop j...@warcop.com wrote:
Just an FYI for anyone working with Jabber.
The 10.6 releases are going to post today for download
Was there also a change in the firewall in conjunction to the DNS change? What
is the traversal client configured to connect to now? Is the edge server single
NIC With nat?
Connecting to the public IP of the edge is actually a correct configuration if
you also work out the nat kungfu on the
worked fine ...
Cheers
Sebastian
--On 27. Januar 2015 14:49:47 -0500 Josh Warcop j...@warcop.com wrote:
Just an FYI for anyone working with Jabber.
The 10.6 releases are going to post today for download across Windows,
Mac, iPad, iPhone, and Android.
--
Sebastian Hagedorn
...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Anthony Holloway
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 3:36 PM
To: Josh Warcop; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber 10.6 Updates
That makes three versions in one month. I heard Cisco adopted the Agile
methodologyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki
Jabber is a CTI application and RCC controls phones. Your use case would be
somewhat skewed in this instance since Jabber has all and more of the call
control features built in. I would think you would want to remove RCC and have
Jabber do all of the call control. Having both seems like it
Fairly confident you don't have to reset phones.
From: Dave Wolgastmailto:dwolg...@rochester.rr.com
Sent: 1/22/2015 3:39 PM
To: Cisco VOIP Newsletter - puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] CFA CSS Activation Policy - Phone Reset
Both can be activated but it is a requirement that a team be on CAD or Finesse.
Essentially giving a 'Team' based migration approach from CAD to Finesse.
From: Lelio Fulgenzimailto:le...@uoguelph.ca
Sent: 1/19/2015 2:04 PM
To: voip
Has anyone tested Jabber MRA via Expressway over 443 and not 8443?___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
finding that will def help
5) Cross your fingers
Welcome to the Cisco licensing nightmare J
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Dana
Tong
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2015 6:10 PM
To: Josh Warcop; Erick Wellnitz; Charles Goldsmith
Cc: cisco-voip
You're not going to get far until you can prove what was paid for. They are not
being unhelpful intentionally as their systems can only go back so far. Being
that old those records are no longer online and have been archived.
If the client has lost everything including PAK keys you're going to
I could be mistaken, bu this functionality doesn't exist today.
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Pavan Kmailto:pav.c...@gmail.com
Sent: 1/7/2015 1:28 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Blocking Jabber file
. If
you're simply adding firmware updates via Device Pack, then only restart
TFTP.
On Tue Jan 06 2015 at 10:57:29 AM Josh Warcop j...@warcop.com wrote:
#1 Use BAT to apply specific firmware loads to the phone configuration
and not rely on device defaults.
#2 Install COP and restart TFTP
#3 Why
#1 Use BAT to apply specific firmware loads to the phone configuration and not
rely on device defaults.
#2 Install COP and restart TFTP
#3 Why reboot the server?
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Anthony Hollowaymailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com
Sent:
2 Release keys should be two different PAKs. The options for everything else
including RMS you'll do partial fulfillment. Some line items go to edge and
some go to core. This is how you split it up.
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Matthew
and its sounds like
either one could potentially be used by a client at any given time.
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Josh Warcop j...@warcop.com wrote:
Great question. There is a mixture of TFTP/UDS and version 9.x or 10.x
determines what is used and when.
If you deploy the _cisco-uds SRV
, Josh Warcop j...@warcop.com wrote:
Seems to be some confusion in this area...
UDS runs on Tomcat and accessed over HTTPS and with recent versions supports
SAML SSO. It's throttled so there isn't any difference pointing to subscribers
or publisher first. The UDS service is a network service
UDS runs on each node so for redundancy put in SRV records weighted or balanced.
https://supportforums.cisco.com/document/12228191/jabber-service-discovery-using-user-data-service-uds-faq-live-webcast
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Ed
Seems to be some confusion in this area...
UDS runs on Tomcat and accessed over HTTPS and with recent versions supports
SAML SSO. It's throttled so there isn't any difference pointing to subscribers
or publisher first. The UDS service is a network service on each node and
cannot be disabled.
First - your target version should be the 10.6 release which is Communications
Manager 10.5.2 and CCX 10.6.1.
You merging of UCCX should also include going to Finesse and dropping CAD.
If you have a non-overlapping dial plan the merging is simple. However if you
have to do a lot of dial plan
I'm trying to understand what you're pointing out. Expressway is an HTTPS proxy
so there wouldn't be any LDAP sent over the Internet. So UDS serves that
purpose so that off premise clients can search the directory.
From what I'm reading this is more of your security setup and nothing wrong
, at 3:17 PM, Josh Warcop j...@warcop.com wrote:
First - your target version should be the 10.6 release which is
Communications Manager 10.5.2 and CCX 10.6.1.
You merging of UCCX should also include going to Finesse and dropping CAD.
If you have a non-overlapping dial plan the merging
Another thing I just saw. Split DNS isn't required and generally I dislike
split DNS even though it does have its use cases.
Using different internal host domains, external domains, and different presence
domains is supported. What it comes down to is certificates and if you're going
to go
the primary extension configured?
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 18, 2014, at 6:31 PM, Josh Warcop j...@warcop.com wrote:
I'm trying to understand what you're pointing out. Expressway is an HTTPS
proxy so there wouldn't be any LDAP sent over the Internet. So UDS serves
that purpose so that off
them into a hidden container, I should be
able to create another import config to bring those in.
Another question if you don't mind.
With URI dialing, which extension does it use?
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 18, 2014, at 8:14 PM, Josh Warcop j...@warcop.com wrote:
That is configurable via
Yep, the same issue exists in CUCM if using I.E Firefox is the way to go
since Cisco and Mozilla are best buddies.
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Walenta, Philipmailto:philip.wale...@polycom.com
Sent: 12/17/2014 11:45 AM
To: Jason Aarons
Essentially direct attached storage or via fiber channel. Not to say it wont
work via the other methods but it is your choice to stick with the support
table or not. I have seen people do it via all of the above and have a don't
ask don't tell policy of you engage TAC relating to performance.
All good until our storage guy messed up the NFS permissions and the call
manager died.
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Scott Vollmailto:svoll.v...@gmail.com
Sent: 12/17/2014 7:16 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re:
That is definitely more of an A/V conversation than a Cisco one. The A/V
support is really up to you. There are thousands of room and acoustic
configurations to account for. Wireless audio isn't a basic thing and to think
a RadioShack 2.4Ghz mix solution is going to fit everyone's needs isn't
: Friday, December 12, 2014 10:20 AM
To: 'Bill Talley'; Josh Warcop
Cc: cisco-voip
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] licensing turnaround time 8.6 to 10.5
It just took us 39 days to get our licensing for 9.1.1 to 10.5
Neal Haas
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf
that are SE’s and if there is some magical external email
address that gets a faster response from GLO then we all (partners and
customers) will benefit from it. From: Anthony Holloway
[mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 2:59 PM
To: Mike; Josh Warcop; Haas, Neal
Nope. All it does is a device to DN association regardless of the device.
From: jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 20:06:03 +
Subject: [cisco-voip] 10.5 and Self Provisioning
Is the new 10.x Self Provisioning does CallManager care
...
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Josh Warcop j...@warcop.com wrote:
I'm curious..
Are you guys using https://survey.opinionlab.com/survey/s?s=10422 OR
https://tools.cisco.com/SWIFT/LicensingUI/Quickstart
Get Other Licensing... -- Migration -- Voice Products -- And
submitting the ELM request
I'm not sure what licensing team you're working with but there is a specific
migration team for Collab products. We do several upgrades monthly for clients
and it has never been over 24 hours. Understanding everything that needs to be
done prior to engaging TAC is usually the fault of the
Really not intending to hijack this thread but we've seen some interesting
squelching issues when answering calls with 8945s and the speakerphone. It's
like it takes 4-5 seconds to do an audio cut through and in that meantime it
has feedback. If answering with other model phones everything is
Correct. It isn't an instant poll in Lync or Jabber. Just a caveat to the
Wimdows presence API. Additional presence is available is IMP has an Exchange
server as a presence source. That way you can be offline with Jabber and 'In a
meeting' will still show if there is a calendar event.
Sent
TAC opened 3 bugs on my behalf related to CUBE line-side SIP proxy. Not
including the documentation bugs that were opened. CUBE in that fashion has a
few specific use cases and in my simple use case of replacing ASA phone-proxy
it didn't hold up. Expressway is your go to solution for Jabber
:33 AM
To: Josh Warcop; Pavan K; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber contact disappears consistently
I complete agree, put all Jabberusers on single server. Saw the same bugs in
10x.
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Josh
Andy,
I do Telepresence frequently so I know where you're coming from. Licensing
should've been in the conversation from the beginning. Neither VCS or CUCM will
provide that call control without some sort of license. You'll need TP Room
Licensing for those endpoints registering to CUCM.
Did
I'm not 100% following you but have you modified the call handler to not
operate on a * input? A default call handler accepts * as input.
What is the original goal of transferring from Unity?
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Leslie
B.
From: Anthony Hollowaymailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com
Sent: 11/22/2014 9:17 PM
To: Cisco VoIP Groupmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] QoS Policing Bandwidth Question
Here's a little Saturday afternoon thought provoking question
I'm finding per circuit bandwith becoming irrelevant. It is so easy tom get
100Mbps Ethernet circuits. 87.Kbps is still the answer.
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Anthony Hollowaymailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com
Sent: 11/22/2014 9:40 PM
To: Cisco VoIP
It isn't really a device reset. The ITL updates and it is a brief restart. The
screen flashes for a moment but the phone does not fully cycle.
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Brian Meademailto:bmead...@vt.edu
Sent: 11/21/2014 2:02 PM
To: Jason Aarons
IM forking. IM and Presence Service continues to fork IMs to each
client, until the contact replies. Once the contact replies, IM and Presence
Service only delivers IMs to the client on which the contact replied.
Matt
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Josh
Side note - I've started advocating assigning firmware loads to devices via
BAT. I no longer want all phones to upgrade or downgrade immediately following
a CUCM version switch.
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Heim, Dennismailto:dennis.h...@wwt.com
Sent:
Version 6
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Jason Aarons (AM)mailto:jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com
Sent: 11/7/2014 8:43 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Extension Mobility on subscribers?
older versions of
Fun stuff. I have a client with Lync and Jabber intradomain and LDAP sync is
set to use msRTCSIP which requires the jabber-config.xml to specify that and
the prefix of sip:. For installations where Lync is going away or a none issue
the LDAP sync should be set to sync via the mail attribute.
Are you going to be running the 10.5 latest releases of Jabber?
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: José Paulo de Oliveira Petrymailto:petr...@gmail.com
Sent: 10/29/2014 9:32 AM
To: Cisco VoIPoE Listmailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Jabber
Not recommended approach. SSL future guidelines dictates that non approved TLDs
in SAN names will no longer be supported. IP address and short names in SANs is
a bandaid. The proper way to to change the server name setting to the FQDN and
ensure every device is getting proper DNS suffix and DNS
to be such a process to get entitlement?
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mike
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 11:04 AM
To: 'Josh Warcop'; 'Ryan Ratliff (rratliff)'
Cc: 'cisco-voip voyp list'
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] BE5K to BE6K license with valid UCSS issue
Negative. A corporation is not required to offer 911 services to the internal
PBX connected phones. The business pays the 911 access fees via their bill but
that doesn't have to translate to an internally built system. The ACTUAL
problem is that in states with E911 legislation is you'll get a
suspect most people are going to say/think/feel about this.
For the record, I am targeting 10.5(1)SU1, but Cisco running true to form,
the latest Upgrade Guide available is for 10.0(1).
Screenshot for reference:
[image: Inline image 1]
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Josh Warcop j...@warcop.com wrote
It does work. CUCM just gives the endpoints a reference to the SRST router.
When in reality it doesn't have to be an SRST at all. /wink
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Jason Aarons (AM)mailto:jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com
Sent: 10/22/2014 10:31 AM
To:
partner has to find the Cisco Sales Orders and since
the customer left that partner they have no desire to help (bad ethics).
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Josh
Warcop
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 10:41 AM
To: Mike ; 'Ryan Ratliff (rratliff)'
Cc: 'cisco
54 matches
Mail list logo
