Re: [cisco-voip] VMware 5.5

This discussion comes up about every 6 months on this list, LRO is no longer affected and was only a 4.1 issue on esxi. http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/2012-October/029907.html http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Unified_Communications_VMware_Requirements#Supported_Versions.2C_Patches_and_Up

Re: [cisco-voip] RTMT not able to collect trace files in 10.0.1

The weird thing is, it started working.. No changes were made. Really really strange. No, I'm not imagining things and made sure I was using the right servers and such. We had 2-3 people try from different PCs with different RTMT versions including the one from the particular CUCM server. It look

Re: [cisco-voip] HELP

I'm guessing the router is on IOS 12.4(24)T3 maybe?12.4(24)T2 has 24.3.2 and 12.4(24)T4 has 24.3.4. If everything was working fine, reboot the router. Maybe you're facing a bug in that IOS version or DSP firmware. Did you maybe have a custom dsp image on the router flash (guido.dsp, etc)? I

Re: [cisco-voip] VMware 5.5

While that particular DocWiki does suggest that it is no longer needed to disable Large Receive Offset on ESXi 4.1 with CUCUM 8.6 and above; you should also note that one of the specific issues having LRO on can cause is consistent CPU pegging for the UCOS guests (wouldn't be the first time some

Re: [cisco-voip] PCD CUCM Migration Upgrades with UCCX

Thanks Ryan. What if I opted to use the PCD tool to upgrade/migrate CUCM to 10.5 using new hostnames and IPs. *Maintenance Window 1* 1) Virtualize UCCX v8 on ESXi *Business Hours work (doesn't impact production)* 1) Install PCD, migrate/upgrade CUCM from old version to 10.5 with new hostnames &

Re: [cisco-voip] VMware 5.5

That page specifically says you don't have to disable LRO if you are above 4.1 esxi and 8.6 CUCM. Martin, which version of 5.5 are you on? GA, update 1 or 2? I recently ran into an issue with a customer on 5.5 u1 and too new of raid drivers on the card and had to downgrade the drivers. Wasn't c

Re: [cisco-voip] One SAN certificate for all Cisco UC

Nope, wouldn't work as you cannot import private keys Sent from my Windows Phone From: James Buchanan Sent: ‎11/‎17/‎2014 3:17 PM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: [cisco-voip] One SAN certi

Re: [cisco-voip] One SAN certificate for all Cisco UC

Issue traditionally would be the private keys. There is no way to upload the private keys on most if not all the cisco collab products. VCS/Expressways allows you to do that. You would need a whole bunch of SANs and generally the first 5 are free depending on the CA. Dennis Heim | Collaboration

[cisco-voip] One SAN certificate for all Cisco UC

Hello, Digicert advertises the ability to create a SAN certificate for several UC applications. I wonder--could one create a single SAN certificate for CUCM, Unity Connection, IM&P, CWMS, and Expressway? After all, if the FQDN is in the SAN field, wouldn't it work? Thanks, James

Re: [cisco-voip] VMware 5.5

Martin, Have you disabled Large Receive Offset (LRO) on all the Elastic Sky hosts? http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Disable_LRO Thanks, Ryan Huff CCIE Collaboration (Written), CCNP Voice, CCNA Voice, CCNA Route & Switch, CCNA Wireless UCCX Specialist From: m...@bilobit.com To: j

Re: [cisco-voip] RTMT not able to collect trace files in 10.0.1

The components displayed on the first page are defined by an XML file stored on the UCM server. Likely that file is missing or corrupt. Any unexpected power outages or filesystem issues? Filenames on the server are documented in the footnote here: https://supportforums.cisco.com/document/65651/c

Re: [cisco-voip] VMware 5.5

Ryan, this is default (on). Is it best practice to disable LRO? From: Ryan Huff [mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com] Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 1:58 PM To: James Buchanan; Martin Schmuker Cc: Cisco VoIP Mailing List Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] VMware 5.5 Martin, Have you disabled Large Receive Offs

Re: [cisco-voip] VMware 5.5

So 5.5 is supported with CUCM 9.1.x So the question is: Why do I have CUCM at 100% CPU? Only hard reset helps at this point. Thanks, Martin From: James Buchanan [mailto:james.buchan...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 1:10 PM To: Martin Schmuker Cc: Cisco VoIP Mailing List Subject: Re

Re: [cisco-voip] HELP

Well, you can't make calls because there are no resources available to negotiate the call, that much is clear. I assume this issue came about after you upgraded the IOS on the router? What platform do you have and what code are you currently running? The firmware for the DSP is in the IOS co

[cisco-voip] HELP

HELP, I CAN'T CALL OUT ON E1 AND FXO. SEE MESSAGE ON THE ROUTER. voice-card 0 ! Warning! DSPs 5 in slot 0 are using non-default firmware from device flash: ! This is not recommended, the IOS default version is 24.3.3 -- If you are not the intended recipient and have received this e-mail in er

Re: [cisco-voip] VMware 5.5

Martin, Have you disabled Large Receive Offset (LRO) on the Elastic Sky hosts? http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Disable_LRO Thanks, Ryan Huff CCIE Collaboration (Written), CCNP Voice, CCNA Voice, CCNA Route & Switch, CCNA Wireless UCCX Specialist Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 07:10:05 -0500 From: james.

Re: [cisco-voip] VMware 5.5

Hello, Whenever you are looking for answers on UC virtualization, look here: http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Virtualization_for_Cisco_Unified_Communications_Manager_%28CUCM%29 Thanks, James On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 5:36 AM, Martin Schmuker wrote: > Guys, > > > > since 3 weeks we are running our

[cisco-voip] VMware 5.5

Guys, since 3 weeks we are running our UC Environment (CUCM, Unity Cxn, IM&P) on ESXi 5.5. At Friday we setup new vCenter 5.5 and added the esx hosts. Since saturday, all machines are stuck in 100% CPU after a few hours. Sometimes all machines at the *same* time! They don't reply Ping (ICMP Ech

Re: [cisco-voip] E1 CAS card in Mexico not getting enough digits

More like Tequila! I'm in Mexico City this week...and this case deserved a large bottle of it! From: Ryan Huff [mailto:ryanh...@outlook.com] Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 4:11 AM To: Jason Aarons (AM); Anthony Holloway; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] E1 CAS card in Mexico

Re: [cisco-voip] E1 CAS card in Mexico not getting enough digits

Well it had to either be the Telco or an inbound xlate. Glad you found it! Good job, now go have an Iced Tea and a vacation! From: jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com To: avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com; ryanh...@outlook.com; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] E1 CAS card in Mexico