Re: [cisco-voip] VG 350 BAT CUCM 11.0.1.21900-11

[Jonathan Charles]

OK, I figured out a workaround without patching...

The trick is to make sure you create slot 0/0/0 in your template for both
module 2 and 4... if you do just 2, it fails.If you do both, it works fine..

I have confirmed this on the VG350, it should work on the 320 too.



Jonathan

On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:15 PM, Jonathan Charles 
wrote:

> Thanks!
>
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Wes Sisk (wsisk)  wrote:
>
>> CSCus83367BAT- Error when trying to update values for slots of VG350
>> SCCP gateway
>>
>> https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCus83367
>>
>> -Wes
>>
>> On Sep 25, 2016, at 9:39 PM, Jonathan Charles  wrote:
>>
>> So, when I try to BAT in the VG350, it fails on module 4 and kicks error:
>>
>> 2036 DOMAIN NAME MAC Address already exists.
>>
>> On every port...
>>
>>
>> Any way to work around it, I have a lot of these to add...
>>
>>
>>
>> Jonathan
>> ___
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] 8851 and Transfers

[Lamont, Joshua]

What are the versions of the firmware you have tried?

Thanks,

Joshua Lamont
Senior Telecommunications Engineer
Brown University
office (401) 863-1003
cell(401) 749-6913

On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Haas, Neal  wrote:

> No side Car, and this is a shared line across multiple phones.
>
>
>
> Thank You,
>
>
>
> Neal Haas
>
>
>
> *From:* Carlo Calabrese [mailto:carlo_calabrese2...@yahoo.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 5, 2016 2:17 PM
> *To:* Haas, Neal ; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] 8851 and Transfers
>
>
>
> Does this have a Side Car? we had a problem with this awhile back, not
> sure if same model but we had to roll back.
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, October 4, 2016 7:16 PM, "Haas, Neal" 
> wrote:
>
>
>
> We have 8851 phones, just upgraded to the new firmware, now we have issues.
>
>
> When a phone call is in the process of being transferred and a new call
> comes in the phone will not let you finish the transfer. How can we stop
> this issue?
>
> Anyone have a solution - besides rolling back the firmware?
>
>
>
>
> Neal Haas
> ?
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Federate with Google

[Brian Meade]

That SRV record is used for standard XMPP clients connecting to you.  You
probably had C2S selected on the site instead of S2S which checks
_xmpp-server._tcp.

On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 8:54 AM, Michael Voity  wrote:

> Brian,
>
>
>
> Thanks for the Link.
>
>
>
> Is the SRV record “_xmpp-client._tcp.”  Required for the federation to
> happen?
>
>
>
> I haven’t gotten that far yet for a packet capture.   That’s next.
>
>
>
> -Mike
>
>
>
> --
>
> Michael T. Voity
>
> Network Engineer
>
> University of Vermont
>
>
>
> *From:* bmead...@gmail.com [mailto:bmead...@gmail.com] *On Behalf Of *Brian
> Meade
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 12, 2016 15:23
> *To:* Michael Voity 
> *Cc:* voip puck 
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Federate with Google
>
>
>
> Also how far do you see the federation attempt getting.  Got a packet
> capture from the Expressway?
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Brian Meade  wrote:
>
> You can try running your domain against this tool- https://xmpp.net/
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Michael Voity  wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> Is there a trick to getting Jabber through VCS to federate with google?
>
>
>
> I verified that Security mode is “TLS optional” client side Cert is “off”
> and privacy mode is “off” too on my vcs-e serer
>
>
>
> I have no issue federating with others.
>
>
>
> -Mike
>
>
>
> --
>
> Michael T. Voity
>
> Network Engineer
>
> University of Vermont
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
>
>
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco and Lync/Skype with Media Bypass

[Matt Slaga (AM)]

Media Bypass in SfB maximums are not posted, they only post the Mediation 
server transcoding maximums, which are between 1100 and 1500 for each dedicated 
mediation server and 150 for co-located mediation server.
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg615015.aspx

In my opinion, the bigger limitation however is on the CUCM side.  SfB 
endpoints will bypass the mediation server, however every call will terminate 
to either CUCM MTP or an MTP within an IOS gateway (if configured in 
MRG/MRGLs).  Today, it is not possible to connect a SfB endpoint directly to a 
Cisco endpoint without a Cisco MTP in the middle.  This is extremely important 
when designing your integration, especially if you have a large deployment.



From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
Norton, Mike
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 6:50 PM
To: Mark Holloway ; voip puck 

Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco and Lync/Skype with Media Bypass



Are you using the official Planning Tool that you download and install from 
Microsoft? One of the questions it asks about each site is what percentage of 
calls will use media bypass. When you get to the end it should take your media 
bypass use into consideration in its recommendations.

-mn


-Original Message-
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mark 
Holloway
Sent: October-12-16 2:39 PM
To: voip puck >
Subject: [cisco-voip] Cisco and Lync/Skype with Media Bypass

This is more of a Microsoft question but I’ve searched everywhere and cannot 
find an answer. I’m currently working on a design to integrate CUCM and Skype 
for Biz. The Skype client will have media bypass enabled. All the Lync/Skype 
capacity calculators and TechNet articles talk about how many calls a Mediation 
server can handle when media is anchored. With media bypass only SIP signaling 
will pass through the Mediation server. There are no published numbers on how 
many concurrent SIP signaling only calls a mediation server can handle. 
Everything just reference “many more calls” but no ball park numbers. If anyone 
has info that would be great.

Thanks,
Mark


___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip



itevomcid
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip