[cisco-voip] UCCx 10.6 CAD vs Finesse

Does anyone have CAD and Finesse running at the same time? Can you? We have seen documentation that you can only run one or the other. But I seem to remember that someone said in 10.6 you can run both. Anyone able to confirm or deny? TIA Scott ___

[cisco-voip] SRST sccp vs sip

Does anyone have a simple SIP SRST config they can share? What is the difference between the SCCP vs SIP? TIA Scott ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] ExtMob 10.5 error 23?

Has anyone seen Error 23 on a extension Mobility login in CM 10.5.2? We are AD LDAP integrated. I can't figure out what the issue is. I've reset the phone. removed Extmob and re-enabled it. Any help would be appreciated. Scott ___ cisco-voip mailing

Re: [cisco-voip] ExtMob 10.5 error 23?

update. in case anyone else runs into the error 23 with Extension Mobility on CM 10.5. under the user profile, you have to select the Home Cluster Check box. Scott On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Scott Voll <svoll.v...@gmail.com> wrote: > Has anyone seen Error 23 on a

[cisco-voip] CAD client Focus

we upgraded from UCCx 8.5 to 10.6. in 8.5 you could setup the CAD client to NOT take the focus on the screen. Now, no matter what we try, the CAD client always takes focus as soon as the phone rings. Anyone know how to change that? TIA Scott ___

Re: [cisco-voip] CDR on CM 10.5.2.12901-1

Follow up. got the SOAP thing working, but this is a rebuild of the SUB. Anything I have to do with a SUB rebuild? I'm wondering if I'm only getting PUB CDR's. TIA Scott On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Scott Voll <svoll.v...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry, we are getting some

[cisco-voip] CDR on CM 10.5.2.12901-1

Any bugs on this version with CM not sending CDR's to reporting server? our Reporting vendor is saying they are not getting the CDR's. we just upgraded from 8.6.2 to 10.5.2.12901-1 TIA Scott ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net

Re: [cisco-voip] CDR on CM 10.5.2.12901-1

g the cdr repository service under > network services? > > > > *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] *On Behalf > Of *Scott Voll > *Sent:* Thursday, October 08, 2015 12:05 PM > *To:* cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > *Subject:* [cisco-voip] CDR o

Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 10.5 and OpenText 10.6

Ed-- (Troy too) Thanks for posting the fix. That was perfect for our upgrade too!! Scott On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Countryman, Edward < edward.country...@presencehealth.org> wrote: > This turned out to be a setting in Rightfax. Now working again! > > Many thanks to Troy Putnam for

[cisco-voip] Feature Request to fix Licensing issues with EM

OK, everyone has complained about the licensing nightmare that EM plays in CM 9 and 10. My coworker has come up with a fix.. In thinking this all through, I thought about how I would like it all to work mechanically. Here is what I would like to request as a Feature/Enhancement Request:

Re: [cisco-voip] Feature Request to fix Licensing issues with EM

because their CUWL Standard would cover it. The > negative is that the UCM User page, and their Jabber client on the PC/Mac, > would show this random phone for them to manage. > > I think > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.v...@gmail.com> wrote: >

Re: [cisco-voip] Unity user parameters greyed out

ilto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Friday, September 11, 2015 2:41 PM > *To:* Scott Voll <svoll.v...@gmail.com>; Chris Ward (chrward) < > chrw...@cisco.com> > > *Cc:* cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Unity user parameters greyed out &g

Re: [cisco-voip] Unity user parameters greyed out

just upgraded to UC 10.5 having the same issue with the extension grayed out on LDAP enabled users after the upgrade. is this a bug? Can someone let me know what you found out? Thanks Scott On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Chris Ward (chrward) wrote: > Ryan, > > > > Can

[cisco-voip] Licensing going from 8.6 to 10.5

What is the right way to upgrade my licenses? I know there has been talk about associating phones to users. What is the current thought? I have Smartnet UCSS, whatever it's called now for 1000 CM, and UC I have ~1400 phones mainly 7961. a few others see below. All Users are using EM. All

[cisco-voip] UCCx CAD client pre upgrade

For all those UCCx guys that upgrade lots and lots of UCCx deployments. How do you get the CAD client before the upgrade so you can have the workstation guys deploy it? Do you setup a test UCCx box and just download it from there, or is there a better way? we are upgrading from 8.5 to 10.6. We

[cisco-voip] CER export to Intrado

So I've dealt with intrado and CER for a while and always end up with issues. for every Location I create two ELIN's. The problem is that with the export it ends up with the primary ELIN is the same as the main number, but the second ELIN is not the same as the Main telephone number so it gets

[cisco-voip] Jabber vm tab missing

running Jabber 10.5.2 CM 8.6.2 UC 8.6.2 I have my Jabber client and I have VM, Meetings, and Phone control. My coworker does not have the VM. Any ideas why I have the account tab and he does not? TIA Scott ___ cisco-voip mailing list

Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber vm tab missing

Scott Voll svoll.v...@gmail.com wrote: running Jabber 10.5.2 CM 8.6.2 UC 8.6.2 I have my Jabber client and I have VM, Meetings, and Phone control. My coworker does not have the VM. Any ideas why I have the account tab and he does not? TIA Scott

Re: [cisco-voip] jabber on wIntel on a stick platform

can you get a HD camera that you could power over USB extensions? or is the computer close enough to the camera? On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 3:06 AM, Ed Leatherman ealeather...@gmail.com wrote: Neat idea Lelio, i might try that out myself. On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi

[cisco-voip] 8861 not programable buttons

How do you setup the buttons on the right hand side? I have two 8861's one has a phone and recent. the other has a phone, vm and recent. How do I get them configured the same? Thanks scott ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net

Re: [cisco-voip] PCD download Bootable?

I have Valid contracts and just PUT for UC, CM, CER, UCCx, PLM and got all of them downloaded. But I Can't find PCD in the PUT. Am I looking for the wrong thing? I do see a Prime Collaboration Standard. is that it in PUT? TIA Scott On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Ryan Huff

Re: [cisco-voip] PCD download Bootable?

Follow up. I did find it under my edelivery for CM. Sorry for the noise. scott On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Scott Voll svoll.v...@gmail.com wrote: I have Valid contracts and just PUT for UC, CM, CER, UCCx, PLM and got all of them downloaded. But I Can't find PCD in the PUT. Am I

[cisco-voip] 8861 via wireless

Has anyone setup the 8861 phone on wireless? How is it going? We continue to have issues with our Proof of Concept. I have a idea that it's the phone drivers. but can't prove it. TIA Scott ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net

Re: [cisco-voip] What is better than MediaSense for recording calls?

We have had telrex callrex now enghouse QMS for about 2+ years. System works with forked audio. Does the job. I don't care for the fact that you have to have two different servers so you can run SCCP phones and one to run SIP phones. The front end is wrote in silverlight, which I'm not a fan

[cisco-voip] Expressway ?'s

Im still on UC 8.6. we are planning an upgrade to 10.x We currently have DLU's for licensing and will be moving to CUWL Standard ( I think). How does Expressways factor into this? is it part of CUWL? Is there a Cost? What all can you do with Expressway. What I believe I understand is that

[cisco-voip] Forked Audio

Our Current call recording vendor just told me they only support SCCP phones. is anyone else using a Forked audio call recording server that supports SIP and Built in Bridge? we are migrating to 8861's which are SIP phones. What Vendors are you using and do you have the pro's and con's you

[cisco-voip] OT: EM video?

Any cool videos of IKE (cartoon guy) and Extension Mobility or something. we are rolling out Extension Mobility corporate wide and they were hoping for something fun. TIA Scott ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net

Re: [cisco-voip] 1/4 calls to DDI while rest to ext.

the circular HG as it distributes evenly. On 22 May 2015 at 17:33, Scott Voll svoll.v...@gmail.com wrote: I think you could also use a global variable and look up which call your on and route 1-3 to one and number 4 somewhere else. But my UCCx is a little rusty as my partner has managed UCCx

Re: [cisco-voip] 1/4 calls to DDI while rest to ext.

use case might help us to understand... But things that come to might are using UCCx for sending calls where you want them to go. you could also look at using Hunt groups native to CM but knowing what your trying to accomplish will help us to give a better answer. YMMV Scott On Fri, May

Re: [cisco-voip] 1/4 calls to DDI while rest to ext.

I think you could also use a global variable and look up which call your on and route 1-3 to one and number 4 somewhere else. But my UCCx is a little rusty as my partner has managed UCCx since I came here. or a circular hunt group in CM might work to. Haven't' tried this. YMMV Scot On Fri,

[cisco-voip] OT -- Anyone see this?

I have not seen anything on either nsp or voip this morning. Just checking that I'm not having issues. Scott ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] what if...... phone loses connectivity while upgrading

What if a phone loses connectivity to CM while in the middle of a firmware update? I need to load new firmware for my 8861's but I have had some connectivity issues over wireless and don't want to brick the phone. TIA Scott ___ cisco-voip mailing list

Re: [cisco-voip] RTMT??? or some other way to monitor a phone

the AlternateSyslog for the primary subscriber the phones are registered to. That will show all phone registrations/unregistrations. On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Scott Voll svoll.v...@gmail.com wrote: we have 8861 phones that are just below an AP that are registering and unregistering (but working well

Re: [cisco-voip] RTMT??? or some other way to monitor a phone

Message From: Scott Voll svoll.v...@gmail.com Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2015 05:39 PM To: Brian Meade bmead...@vt.edu Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] RTMT??? or some other way to monitor a phone CC: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Sorry, yes. I just want to see the registration of those pilot

[cisco-voip] RTMT??? or some other way to monitor a phone

We are troubleshooting a wireless deployment of 8861 phones. is there any way to monitor just a phone / phone model / device pool / etc so I can just see what I'm looking for? Looks like RTMT is just all registered phones. TIA Scott ___ cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] RTMT??? or some other way to monitor a phone

Sorry, yes. I just want to see the registration of those pilot phones. Scott On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Brian Meade bmead...@vt.edu wrote: What exactly are you trying to monitor? Just registration status? On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 5:34 PM, Scott Voll svoll.v...@gmail.com wrote: We

Re: [cisco-voip] RTMT??? or some other way to monitor a phone

Original Message From: Scott Voll svoll.v...@gmail.com Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2015 05:34 PM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: [cisco-voip] RTMT??? or some other way to monitor a phone We are troubleshooting a wireless deployment of 8861 phones. is there any way to monitor just

[cisco-voip] licensing 8.6 vs 10.5

we are looking at upgrading soon. Can someone confirm what I believe: in version 10.x our licensing changes to user based. With this, I can add as many nodes as I like? I currently have 2 nodes. if I wanted to add a 3rd that would be included? or adding HA? This would be for CM, UC, CER,

[cisco-voip] BE7000m for UC

who is using BE7000m for there UC deployment. Any pro's vs con's? TIA Scott ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] DX80 Remote Access?

15, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Scott Voll svoll.v...@gmail.com wrote: Anyone have any of these DX80's? How are you supporting it remotely? Log me in Rescue does not work. Webex does not work I'm deploying these to remove sites and need to support the users and don't want to drive 4 hours each way

[cisco-voip] DX80 Remote Access?

Anyone have any of these DX80's? How are you supporting it remotely? Log me in Rescue does not work. Webex does not work I'm deploying these to remove sites and need to support the users and don't want to drive 4 hours each way. TIA Scott ___

Re: [cisco-voip] DX80 Remote Access?

Same Error. On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Brian Meade bmead...@vt.edu wrote: You need to use a user that has CTI control of the device. On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Scott Voll svoll.v...@gmail.com wrote: [image: Inline image 1] unless the admin user / pwd is something other than

Re: [cisco-voip] DX80 Remote Access?

avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com wrote: It is an Android Tablet at the end of the day, so I did a google search for remotely supporting these guys and this was the first link. http://www.bomgar.com/solutions/mobile-device-support On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:05 AM Scott Voll svoll.v...@gmail.com

[cisco-voip] Hardware for UC

What hardware is everyone using to upgrade there UC enviroment to? We have UCS Blades with netapp storage, but have had some limitations on IO (prior to the upgraded controllers) that I'm a little concerned about. I like the idea of vmotion. But I'm thinking if it's my back side on the line

Re: [cisco-voip] Singlewire Remote Phone Control - Now Free!

and what it supports now is all it will support. They are not continuing the product moving forward. Great product. have used it for years. Call to see if they were going to support the 8861 as that is our new standardized model and found out it's not getting anything new. Guess we will look

Re: [cisco-voip] unsubscribe-all

please go to https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip to unsubscribe On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Ashwin Iyer ash.i...@gmail.com wrote: Regards Ashwin ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net

Re: [cisco-voip] DX70/80 thoughts?

We have just purchased 4 of them. We have large conference rooms in our larger sites and use a TV and a Polycom HD unit. But in our smaller sites (under 20 employees) these units made a lot of sense for their small conference room size and that typically only one or two people would be in, at a

Re: [cisco-voip] Call recording

on the phone, BIB turned on. NO Shared Line appearances (EM works well) Application User setup with all Lines (either EM or Phone) associated Recording option on the line should be set to automatic Call Recording enabled and the recording profile set to your QMS profile On QMS import the user

Re: [cisco-voip] OT: using subnet/wildcard mask for group within a group, issues?

I don't know if I follow all of it. But if you have host with a /26 with a /29 inside of of that network. the larger SN devices will try to go directly to the smaller SN but the Smaller SN will not be able to get to the larger SN. It would not be a design I would try in production. YMMV.

Re: [cisco-voip] testing 1-2-3

got it It's just you ;-) On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi le...@uoguelph.ca wrote: --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure Computing and Communications Services (CCS) University of Guelph 519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354 le...@uoguelph.ca

Re: [cisco-voip] VG 224 %FLEXDSPRM-5-OUT_OF_RESOURCES

9, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Scott Voll svoll.v...@gmail.com wrote: How do I trouble shoot a remote VG224 that is showing 1/9/2015 8:43 AM : FLEXDSPRM-5-OUT_OF_RESOURCES 119: *Mar 1 00:05:14.609: %FLEXDSPRM-5-OUT_OF_RESOURCES: No dsps found either locally or globally. If I understand the syslog

Re: [cisco-voip] IOS Help needed

That is a pay for IOS. if you have paid for it, log into cisco.com and download it there. You might also look at a 15.x code train as it may be more stable than a T train. Scott On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Ravi Mahalingam mrav...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Freinds I Kindly request you to

[cisco-voip] UC on UCS storage.....

OK planning storage requirements for UC on UCS upgrade from 8.6(physical) to 10.5(vm) we are looking at 2 CM nodes, 1 UC, 1 UCCx, one CER, PLM, PCD, and presence. The way I see it from the VM doc's it looks like I need about 1 TB of storage and roughly 8k IOPS. What Protocols are supported?

Re: [cisco-voip] UC on UCS storage.....

I just found this: http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/UC_Virtualization_Supported_Hardware#Storage Looks like all the protocols are supported. FCoE, iSCSI, NFS for 3rd party. Anyone running any of this in production and care to put in your two cents? Scott On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Scott

Re: [cisco-voip] licensing turnaround time 8.6 to 10.5

I'm trying to remember the exact verbage, but at cisco Live they told people to put 8.6 to 10 upgrade in the subject so it got routed to the team Josh alluded to. I also think there was an email address to send to, but I can't remember for sure. Just my 2 cents also. Scott On Fri, Dec 12,

[cisco-voip] AD user remove device in bulk CM 8.6

So we have moved to ExtMob and now we want to remove the phone associated with the users. How can we bulk remove the phones? TIA Scott ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Re: [cisco-voip] Anyone Using Cisco 8945 Handsets?

We have a couple for testing purposes. we have used them with the plantronic's headsets and they worked. The biggest bugger for us is that we use call indicator lights, and with blue tooth you lose that. Nice little phone. yes the UX is different but I think we may go that way next year. we

Re: [cisco-voip] UC integration with MS Office and Lync/MOC

Correct. The new cicilync is more like jabber. If you go to the o365 cloud it pretty much breaks everything. Good luck Scott On Monday, December 1, 2014, george.hend...@l-3com.com wrote: Hey Guys, We’ve been running Cisco UC integration version 8.X (CUCILYNC 8.6) for a while now and

Re: [cisco-voip] using a Translation pattern to move between partitions

that first with the first XLATE, and then remove it, and then do it again to the second XLATE to confirm your hopping. On Fri Nov 07 2014 at 10:24:42 AM Scott Voll svoll.v...@gmail.com wrote: OK, I'm having a senior moment How do I use a translation pattern to change to a different partition

[cisco-voip] UCCx vendors

I'm looking for a UCCx addition to our UCCx. we have been looking at Taske (http://www.taske.com/) but wanted to know if others are using something that they like better? other options?? TIA Scott ___ cisco-voip mailing list

Re: [cisco-voip] Remove lines on phones with BAT

experiences. The logout profile or default state of the phone has a nonDID in most cases, DID in a few cases (with a CSS restriction for Internal and EMS), and the UDP of the user has a DID in most cases, nonDID in a few cases (with typical CSS). On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Scott Voll

Re: [cisco-voip] Remove lines on phones with BAT

for you just like it would any other phone. -Ryan On Oct 30, 2014, at 11:03 AM, Erick Wellnitz ewellnitzv...@gmail.com wrote: Use a partition that isn't accessible by anything except CER CTI ports. On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Scott Voll svoll.v...@gmail.com wrote: OK I get

Re: [cisco-voip] Remove lines on phones with BAT

, at 9:22 AM, Scott Voll svoll.v...@gmail.com wrote: OK I get the picture... So if I'm going to put a line on all phones, can I put a shared line on all 1300 phones? If so, how does CER work? will the PSAP call back the line or does it call back the phone? I have a dialing plan

Re: [cisco-voip] Remove lines on phones with BAT

no they are all 7961 running SCCP Scott On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) rratl...@cisco.com wrote: All phones? SIP phones won't register without a line. -Ryan On Oct 28, 2014, at 1:16 PM, Scott Voll svoll.v...@gmail.com wrote: is there a way to bulk delete all

Re: [cisco-voip] Remove lines on phones with BAT

(rratliff) rratl...@cisco.com wrote: All phones? SIP phones won't register without a line. -Ryan On Oct 28, 2014, at 1:16 PM, Scott Voll svoll.v...@gmail.com wrote: is there a way to bulk delete all lines on all phones? we are moving to extension mobility and want to remove all the lines

[cisco-voip] Remove lines on phones with BAT

is there a way to bulk delete all lines on all phones? we are moving to extension mobility and want to remove all the lines on all the phones Thanks scott CM 8.6.2 ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net

[cisco-voip] 7925 eap-tls timeouts

anyone dealt with a 7925 timing out on the eap-tls handshake? My authentication server keeps seeing these: 5411 Supplicant stopped responding to ISE Failure Reason 12935 Supplicant stopped responding to ISE during EAP-TLS certificate exchange Resolution Verify that supplicant is configured

[cisco-voip] UC bulk export VM from user box

is there a way to bulk export all the VM's out of a users VM box? Currently on UC 8.6.2 Thanks Scott ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] UCS Mini with UC

I know that the UCS mini is VERY New but has anyone put any cycles into thinking about it as a UC platform. For those EDU's / Agencies / etc that have Voice verse server teams, it looks like a good possibility thou it does remind me of a ICS 7750 ;-( Thanks Scott

Re: [cisco-voip] UCS Mini with UC

519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354 le...@uoguelph.ca www.uoguelph.ca/ccs Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 -- *From: *Scott Voll svoll.v...@gmail.com *To: *cisco-voip@puck.nether.net *Sent: *Tuesday, August 26, 2014 4:20:40 PM *Subject

[cisco-voip] Jabber IPv6?

Anyone running Jabber in an IPv6 configuration? is it supported? Cavaets? Thanks Scott ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[cisco-voip] Ad integration with cm

Has any one upgraded there ad functional level to 2008r2? Was there any problems? TAC says that they only support non r2 functional level Thanks Scott ___ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net

Re: [cisco-voip] UC 9 licensing

in case anyone finds this thread I just wanted to add that at cisco live they said that if you put: Drive to Coloaborate Pre or Post Migration it will get routed to the Correct team to get the switch done more quickly. Sorry for the late post, I'm sure your done. Scott On Mon, May 12, 2014

Re: [cisco-voip] Who's going to be at Live next week?

Me too. Scott On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi le...@uoguelph.ca wrote: I will be there! --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure Computing and Communications Services (CCS) University of Guelph 519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354 le...@uoguelph.ca

Re: [cisco-voip] anyone try Skype Connect ?

did you see: https://www.ciscojabbervideo.com/home ? Scott On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 7:49 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi le...@uoguelph.ca wrote: anyone try Skype Connect? http://www.skype.com/en/features/ looks like an interesting thing to try out. --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. Senior Analyst,

[cisco-voip] CLI command to pull hunt groups?

is there a CLI SQL string that I can use to see who is logged in to there hunt group? We use hunt groups extensively (plus UCCx also) but they want a way to see who is logged in at any given time. Right now it's a very manual process. Thanks scott ___

Re: [cisco-voip] CLI command to pull hunt groups?

out the devicehlogdynamic table. -Ryan On Mar 25, 2014, at 12:07 PM, Scott Voll svoll.v...@gmail.com wrote: is there a CLI SQL string that I can use to see who is logged in to there hunt group? We use hunt groups extensively (plus UCCx also) but they want a way to see who is logged

Re: [cisco-voip] ip phone services

go to https://ip_add_of_Pub/car This will be your Call detail reporting. you should be able to enter the extension and dates and put up the reports. it should give you duration among other things. Scott On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Katherine Dupree kdup...@randolphcollege.edu wrote:

<    1   2