Creating a uniquely named user account marked as home cluster on each cluster
would appear to be the simplest. This assumes you have ILS setup between all
clusters and you don’t have a large number of clusters that would chew through
licensing.
> On Apr 28, 2021, at 11:03, Nick Barnett wrote:
The quick and dirty way is to setup your own DNS server using the same domain
as production with SRV records that point to your dev environment.
Switch the DNS servers set on your client PC and toggle back and forth as
needed.
> On Apr 28, 2021, at 09:28, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
>
>
> I may
Does anyone happen to have a copy of prserv.zip that was included in the ATA
186 firmware zip file?
Looks like it’s been removed from CCO
TIA
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
Do you have links for related lists on these services?
> On Dec 25, 2020, at 14:51, Anthony Holloway
> wrote:
>
>
> Chat services like Webex Teams and Discord have killed the list, IMO.
>
> Also, Merry Christmas, all you VoIP Heads out there.
>
>> On Fri, Dec 25, 2020 at 1:38 PM Ryan Huff
Have you checked the ciphers being used and logs on ccm for DRF master and
local and sftp server?
> On Sep 4, 2020, at 10:56, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
>
>
> Oh yes. I remember spending ages on this with Unity Express.
>
> Once you empty out the folder, it works like a charm.
>
> Something
+1 for not using Veeam or any other non supported backup method.
When it doesn’t work or causes production issues the customer is going to blame
you.
Just Say No!
> On Jul 29, 2020, at 18:46, Pawlowski, Adam wrote:
>
> Any sort of IOWait spike will cause processes to core , phones and
monitoring-cti-ports/td-p/2328292
>
> The two people responding seem familiar to me, but I can't quite put my
> finger on who they are.
>
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 11:55 AM Tanner Ezell wrote:
>
> I'll see what I can do.
>
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 9:45 AM UC Penguin
nly JTAPI triggers are used and it's one per
> call, then your Applications running would equal your ports used for the most
> part. However, once you have HTTP triggers, Callback, Trigger Application
> step, etc., this 1:1 goes out the door.
>
>
>
>
>> On Fri, Jul 10, 202
It’s been a long time since I’ve used uccx as uccx. Is the option for real
time reporting present under the Tools menu? (It is when licensed as IP IVR)
It requires Java and is finicky, but does report.
In CCE instead I just look at the usage on the AW and dump that in AW Db and
graph it with
be all set.
Thanks!
> On Jul 9, 2020, at 08:07, Brian Meade wrote:
>
>
> I've used SIPP a lot in the past- http://sipp.sourceforge.net/
>
>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 10:53 AM UC Penguin wrote:
>> I’m curious if anyone has any experience with SIP testing tools.
&g
ths.
>
>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 11:54 AM UC Penguin wrote:
>> Need to send a call to MS Team and see if it returns an error. Ex. User not
>> enabled for voice or unallocated DN.
>>
>>>> On Jul 8, 2020, at 10:34, Nick Britt wrote:
>>>>
>>
Need to send a call to MS Team and see if it returns an error. Ex. User not
enabled for voice or unallocated DN.
> On Jul 8, 2020, at 10:34, Nick Britt wrote:
>
>
> Hi
>
> What sort of testing, load testing?
>
> Chrs
>
>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 7:54 AM
I’m curious if anyone has any experience with SIP testing tools.
I’m looking for a tool to be able to script testing valid configurations. Ex.
Does MS Teams actually accept a call to this URI or does the group that manages
MS Teams need to fix something on there side.
TIA
Not worked with Social Miner so this is just my $0.02:
Restore from backup potentially.
Otherwise if you have a backup the CSR and keys could likely be extracted and
replaced on the existing system. You’ll likely need TAC to do that.
Otherwise, contact the CA they may resign another request at
Not deploying Jabber yet (that will be next), however going through this
exercise to create RMA/SNR config for MS Teams.
Using AXL to gather the data and fix any major issues/see what the current
config is. Then AXL again to set the desired config. Thus far it works great.
That said there was
ks. I’ve lost track of time with all going on.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Adam
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Lelio Fulgenzi
>> Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2020 12:45 PM
>> To: Pawlowski, Adam
>> Cc: Anthony Holloway ; UC Penguin
>> ; Cisco
Slightly OT.
Recently purchased and stood up some SBCs for a MS Team integration. CUBE
wasn’t an option as the feature wasn’t out of beta.
I’ve been happy with the Ribbon SWe virtual platform. It seems easier to
manage/support than CUBEs.
I’m generally happy with a command line however
ledge. I'd like to see
> Donoma pull that off, but again, I just don't see people buying anything.
>
>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 3:58 PM UC Penguin wrote:
>> I’m curious what third party CDR Analysis software is commonly used today
>> and pros/cons of each?
>>
>
I’m curious what third party CDR Analysis software is commonly used today and
pros/cons of each?
Looking for something friendly for non-Engineers to run reports.
Thanks in advance
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
would run on a UCS-E blade, I’d be happy.
>
> From: UC Penguin
> Sent: Monday, May 4, 2020 4:40 PM
> To: Lelio Fulgenzi
> Cc: Charles Goldsmith ; voyp list, cisco-voip
> (cisco-voip@puck.nether.net)
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco moth-balling CUE - Is Connecti
If AA is that critical you could always standup a CUC server that only handles
AA as a backup. There wouldn’t be a license impact with PLM/Smart Licensing as
you don’t need any users.
> On May 4, 2020, at 15:13, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
>
>
> All valid questions. No offense taken. Unless of
There are instructions to migrate the DB:
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/conferencing/telepresence-management-suite-tms/212319-tms-sql-database-migration-from-one-sql.html
Have you tried installing the older version of .NET? I know you can have
multiple versions installed, though
There is the dscp-profile command under voice services voip -> sip
Never used it but if it’s going to be somewhere I’d expect it to be there.
> On Apr 23, 2020, at 14:55, Anthony Holloway
> wrote:
>
>
> Well Scuba Jason,
>
> IOS has always marked control traffic as AF31, as well as SCCP
You’re lucking enough if they power the phone on let alone register it in a lot
of the shows. I find a custom light unlikely.
> On Apr 14, 2020, at 21:02, Johnson, Tim wrote:
>
>
> Looks like an 8841 with maybe a sticker?
>
> On Apr 14, 2020 9:50 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
> I’m watching
ote:
>>>
>>> Yes. We are embarking on this adventure soon, using CUBE.
>>>
>>> Loren
>>>
>>>> On Mar 24, 2020, at 6:28 PM, Brian Meade wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cisco CUBE can be used for this as well.
What external phone number mask are you using?
Is it a valid number?
I’ve seen issues with configs that use invalid masks such as 612-000-.
Carrier will reject the call with busy tone (Comcast).
Another issue that occurs is when a cell phone user calls your DID and is
forwarded to another
Namecheap cert process is a PITA. Haven’t used them for UC servers but helped a
friend with their website after they already bought them from NC.
You can only have it verify ownership with certain predefined by them emails at
your domain, or dns/web.
Namecheap is a good domain registrar but
Does anyone have an experience with setting up interop between CUCM/Microsoft
Teams with Direct Routing?
If so what (supported) SBC did you use and what if any issues did you encounter?
Thanks!
___
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Me too please
> On Mar 16, 2020, at 21:20, Hunter Fuller wrote:
>
> I would also love that info! We use Grafana already internally.
>
> --
> Hunter Fuller
> Router Jockey
> VBH Annex B-5
> +1 256 824 5331
>
> Office of Information Technology
> The University of Alabama in Huntsville
>
ct me on Webex Teams
> mtur...@covene.com / +1-314-297-0770
>
>> On Feb 5, 2020, at 3:17 PM, UC Penguin wrote:
>>
>> *** EXTERNAL EMAIL - DO NOT CLICK LINKS ***
>>
>>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> I have an older TMS, VCS Control and VCS Expres
Greetings,
I have an older TMS, VCS Control and VCS Expressway. Already have new release
keys and S/Ns for TMS/VCS.
I’m curious if rehosting the existing option keys for TMS and VCS Control and
Expressway will automatically revoke the current production licenses?
I have the new systems in an
I haven’t had any issues.
Though the static mac address in esxi is restricted to certain ranges in some
versions of esxi.
I could see this being an issue if you already licensed Xlm and then wanted to
change the mac.
> On Dec 11, 2019, at 09:55, Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) via cisco-voip
>
I’ve noticed this being slower in esxi 6.0 than previous versions.
One of the differences between esxi version in the “system resource
reservation” under the host configuration. It’s limited to 249Mhz on my system.
This was much slower I presume because cpu resources were limited for
It’s much faster if the client is run at the same site as the uccx server (RDP
to a machine with the editor installed).
Not an option that’s possible for all, but there is a huge improvement.
Especially when using the debugger.
> On Sep 24, 2019, at 10:52, Matthew Loraditch
> wrote:
>
>
outsourced TAC. I admittedly haven't opened a TAC case since fixing my
> status, so the benefit has yet to be seen by me. I did notice I can select
> Sev 2 online, however, Sev 1 was still disabled as an option when I took a
> cursory look.
>
>> On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 9:32 AM UC Pe
Mine was associated, though I haven’t seen any noticeable TAC improvements.
> On Sep 24, 2019, at 09:27, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
>
> I’ve forwarded this note to a couple of my colleagues. I’m pretty sure they
> had a similar experience in thinking CCIE treatment was automatic. I’ll have
> to
Ha!
Maybe that will be the next resolution for MacBook’s finicky keys!
> On Mar 29, 2019, at 10:45, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
>
> And it still up! Woot.
>
> https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/voice-unified-communications/unified-ip-phone-7900-series/45283-hook-switch.html
>
> “Press
Is there a SIP normalization profile attached to the SIP trunk used for “Failed
Call from PBX”?
Are changes required to that profile after the remote PBX was modified?
For the “Failed Call from PBX”:
This is a SIP early offer invite. Does the CUCM trunk support early offer?
This invite has
I’m curious why using cp would really matter besides the possibility of
duplicate MAC and UUIDs, which would be an issue if the vms were both powered
on at the same time.
If you had shared storage and multiple hosts you could be running VMs on
different ESXi versions anyhow, without the copy
Pete,
Have you given any consideration to open sourcing the UCOS password decoder?
> On Dec 6, 2018, at 21:00, Pete Brown wrote:
>
> Interesting! Any documentation on that? I checked out the release notes for
> those versions and didn't come across anything pertaining to the remote
>
Yeah, the threads must have a similar issue to the streams:
https://youtu.be/jyaLZHiJJnE
> On Nov 8, 2018, at 18:30, Kent Roberts wrote:
>
> Be nice, but heck they won’t even let you could hyperthreads, but Avaya
> will…..
>
>> On Nov 8, 2018, at 12:05 PM, Scott Voll wrote:
>>
>>
Here is a walk through with screenshots:
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/unified-communications/unified-communications-manager-callmanager/118948-technote-cucm-00.html
> On Aug 23, 2018, at 11:36, Charles Goldsmith wrote:
>
> Recovery disks are used when your CUCM won't boot or you
42 matches
Mail list logo
