em fool proof, but the fools keep getting on
> the system.
>
> Carlo
> --
> *From:* Anthony Holloway
> *To:* Brian Meade
> *Cc:* Carlo Calabrese ; Cisco VoIP Group <
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 12, 2018 12:48
Thanks Anthony,
This will try it in the lab.Keep trying to make the system fool proof, but the
fools keep getting on the system.
Carlo
From: Anthony Holloway
To: Brian Meade
Cc: Carlo Calabrese ; Cisco VoIP Group
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2018 12:48 PM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 5
Seems like I have this discussion with a customer at least once a month.
Sometimes I think some of these cloud-providers offering no off-hook
dialing have done it right, but I'm an off-hook dialer myself.
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 1:43 PM, Anthony Holloway <
avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com> wrote:
It's surprising to me, how many people I hear these days, asking to remove
the PSTN access code (typically a 9 in the US), but then still want intra-
and inter-site abbreviated dialing habits to be supported. The usual
defense is: "I don't have to dial a 9 on my cell phone." Though, these
same pe
Can't you just add those partitions to the existing CSS and make sure
Urgent Priority isn't checked on the 5-digit extensions?
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 10:52 AM, Carlo Calabrese via cisco-voip <
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> wrote:
> Users are doing 10 digit dialing so any calls local or long dist
