cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 12, 2018 12:48 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] 5 digit and 10 digit dialing
>
> Re-reading my email, I realize I have at least one typo. I used 6120 as
> an example extension, and I should have used a fourth digit b
; Cisco VoIP Group
<cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2018 12:48 PM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 5 digit and 10 digit dialing
Re-reading my email, I realize I have at least one typo. I used 6120 as an
example extension, and I should have used a fourth digit between 2-9 t
Seems like I have this discussion with a customer at least once a month.
Sometimes I think some of these cloud-providers offering no off-hook
dialing have done it right, but I'm an off-hook dialer myself.
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 1:43 PM, Anthony Holloway <
avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com> wrote:
It's surprising to me, how many people I hear these days, asking to remove
the PSTN access code (typically a 9 in the US), but then still want intra-
and inter-site abbreviated dialing habits to be supported. The usual
defense is: "I don't have to dial a 9 on my cell phone." Though, these
same
Can't you just add those partitions to the existing CSS and make sure
Urgent Priority isn't checked on the 5-digit extensions?
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 10:52 AM, Carlo Calabrese via cisco-voip <
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> wrote:
> Users are doing 10 digit dialing so any calls local or long
Users are doing 10 digit dialing so any calls local or long distance are just
10 digits. they also want to do 5 digit dialing to the cube next door. I have
* *but is there a way to look for a dial pattern in a different
partition after the inter-digit time out is reached.
So they user
