It actually may depend on what type of IP endpoint is calling the gateway.
With the gateway in MGCP mode, I have had the best overall compatibility
results when I configured the gateway to support RFC2833 and allow CUCM to
negotiate that. I usually keep the Type of DTMF Relay in CUCM to its
default
Companies are of course free to waste their money, but... why did they buy
8845s if they wanted video calls disabled?
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 4:04 PM, Nick Britt
wrote:
> Funnily enough the clients requests were,
>
> - get outbound calls working
> - disable video calls
>
> if only I had disabled
If you read the online help for the Audit Log Configuration page, there's a
tip for the audit level that reads: "Most administrators will leave the
Administrative Tasks setting disabled. For users who want auditing, use the
Database Updates level." If you set the level to Database Updates I think
y
Isn't this somewhat driven by what ports / integration options exist on
your emergency PBX? It also depends on what call handling you wish to
perform when the PRI lines are down... as in what is the point of the
emergency PBX? Are you just looking to play a general announcement when
this happens?
Jason, the country code 39 is Italy, no additional numbers. All numbers
following the country code would be the national in-country number
including any area codes. If this page is to be believed, the zero is part
of most if not all area codes in Italy, so you would include it whether
you're dialin
There are several ways to accomplish this on the UCM side. I would consider
creating a RG for Site A GW and a RG for Site B GW, have one 911 route
pattern accessible via the main CSS that is routed to a RL with Standard
Local Route Group. Then use the Device Pool configurations for Site A and
Site
I followed the directions listed here on an 8865 running firmware 11.7(1)
and the options I see for bandwidth are Auto, 2 Mbps, 1.5 Mbps, 1.0 Mbps,
750 Kbps, 500 Kbps, and 250 Kbps. Auto seems to be the default selection,
so I would assume worst case is a 2 Mbps call - but the actual max rate
gets
The very last item in the SU3 release notes mentions some new datatype
values for MSSQL. This is not something I'm well-versed in, but could this
be related to the errors you are seeing? The document mentioned on Database
Setup doesn't seem to be published in an SU3-specific format as suggested.
In
k <https://www.facebook.com/heliontech?ref=hl> | Twitter
> <https://twitter.com/HelionTech> | LinkedIn
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/helion-technologies?trk=top_nav_home> |
> G+ <https://plus.google.com/+Heliontechnologies/posts>
>
>
>
> *From:*
The information you're looking for is included in the Readme file for the
build, near the bottom. If you go to download from the Cisco site, hover
over the build in question and click CUCM Readme. Here are the links for
convenience:
https://www.cisco.com/web/software/282074295/139049/cucm-readme-1
In some cases the device definitions (e.g. support for new model or new
product specific configuration settings) need to be updated. I believe that
is another reason that *some* devpacks need to be installed on all nodes
rather than just TFTP nodes.
If you are concerned about the Device Defaults b
You can still have an FQDN in the certificate (which is I believe what the
commercial CA will look for), while in System > Server be defined with IP
addresses. As far as I know, the two are not related. What I'm not really
sure of, and I've never taken the time to fully quantify, is whether there
i
It may be that the person performing the page and placing the paging port
on hold is in the front office and isn't within earshot of the plant floor.
I could definitely see that.
In addition to checking the options on the paging system itself, have you
considered the option of configuring the Hold
While I haven't tried to test this specifically, my understanding is that a
network transport that fully supports jumbo frames (e.g. 9000 bytes) will
cause no issues with hosts configured with 1500 byte MTU trying to
communicate. I thought the issues can happen when the configured MTU in the
two ho
Any chance there’s an active vulnerability scanning machine on the network?
With SYN scanning (half-open scans), it only sends a SYN packet to each
port and never fully opens a TCP connection. I’m wondering whether this
scenario might cause CallManager to report this incomplete registration
alarm w
Ryan is quite likely correct.
What I have done in years past to tell if a phone is really unrecoverable
or is instead just stuck in a post-factory-reset loop where it's looking
for firmware is to packet capture the phone's port. I plug it into a switch
and setup a port monitor/span to a machine ru
Matthew, while I haven't personally tested this, I believe if you configure
the Time Zone for the Call Handler to America/Phoenix, it should follow the
daylight savings conventions used in that geography. If they don't use
daylight savings there, then the schedule you set should always be correct
w
ay [mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 20, 2018 4:01 PM
> *To:* Matthew Loraditch
> *Cc:* Dave Goodwin ; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Time Zone Settings for Call handlers
>
>
>
> Hence my question. The solution seem
Daniele, have you tried exploring the service parameter "Stop Routing on
Q.931 Disconnect Cause Code" at all? I'm not certain it will be useful in
your scenario, but if you haven't tried it, that may be an option for you.
It's under Service Parameters > select server > select Cisco CallManager >
cl
I suggest an Internet search for royalty free hold music and carefully read
the license rules of anything you obtain and plan to use. Assume what you
find is not eligible for free use, unless you can find a licensing
statement indicating as such. Make sure you keep an archival copy of any
licensing
That's correct; traditional Location based CAC is always hub and spoke. The
way you have described the configuration, UCM sees the network as a hub
site and two spokes/remote locations (A and B). A has 1.8M of audio
bandwidth to the hub and B has 4.8M audio bandwidth to the hub. If you
place a call
I don't do this stuff very much but I think yes, pretty much. The only time
I've recently piped my PC video AND audio to the room system was when I
just was using it as a huge monitor to play a video with sound for people
in the room. Maybe others actually have a use case for playing video with
sou
I haven't really tried the kind of thing you described in quite a long
time. But I assume the reason the phone gets an IP address is because the
CDP VVLAN information is being successfully sent through the unmanaged
non-Cisco switch so the phone actually sees it. The phone learns its VVLAN
ID, so s
ca
>
>
>
> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook
>
>
>
> [image: University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]
>
> On Oct 3, 2018, at 5:47 PM, Dave Goodwin
> wrote:
>
> I haven't really tried the kind of thing you de
It’s been a while since I did a PCD migration, but does it also require
that PCD log into ESXi on both the source and destination VMware servers?
Or does it only need ESXi access on destination?
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 6:08 PM NateCCIE wrote:
> If you can get osadmin credentials, consider PCD mi
[image: LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/helion-technologies>
> --
> *From:* Dave Goodwin
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 23, 2018 6:21:49 PM
> *To:* NateCCIE
> *Cc:* Brian Meade; Matthew Loraditch; cisco-voip voyp list
>
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Migrate HC
If you're interested, one of the available tasks in Prime Collaboration
Deployment (PCD) is Server Restart Task. It allows you to restart one or
more nodes in a cluster, and schedule the task either immediately or for a
future time.
On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 10:22 AM Matthew Loraditch <
mloradi...@he
This is probably a long shot, but has the system in question been given a
non-default, low MTU? If so, consider raising the MTU if possible to at
least 1280 bytes and rebooting. If this might affect you, contact TAC for
more information.
On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 10:01 AM Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) via
ter.com/heliontech>
>> [image: LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/helion-technologies>
>> *From:* Anthony Holloway
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 8, 2019 10:20 AM
>> *To:* Matthew Loraditch
>> *Cc:* Dave Goodwin ;
>> cisco-voip@puck.
If you want to bring your own IPs to AWS instances instead of using their
Elastic IPs, you can do that now from what I understand:
https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2018/10/announcing-the-general-availability-of-bring-your-own-ip-for-amazon-virtual-private-cloud/
I don’t know if that func
;
>
>
> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs | @UofGCCS on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook
>
>
>
> [image: University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]
>
> On Jan 18, 2019, at 5:05 PM, Dave Goodwin
> wrote:
>
> If you want to bring your own IPs to AWS instances instead o
It is supported when used in the context of VMC-AWS. No word yet on
otherwise (that I've yet seen).
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/rel_notes/12_5_1/cucm_b_release-notes-cucm-imp-1251/cucm_b_release-notes-cucm-imp-1251_chapter_010.html#reference_EEE4B674AFA8E88459BF1FD15761
On a 6608 blade, each port ("host") was like its own device and could
therefore be programmed somewhat independently, and it was nice. Here is a
blast from the past on what some of the CatOS commands for it looked like
and some CallManager 3.0 vintage screen shots...
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/s
Keep in mind that moving a VM from one host to another (whether the VM's
storage is being moved or not) is not considered a vMotion. That is why you
can do it even without enabling any NICs on the host for the vMotion
feature. Therefore, the VMWare feature you'd want to look for in the matrix
is pr
; – which tells me that Enhanced vMotion on a powered up UC VM between
> unshared storage is not supported.
>
>
>
> ^^^ The confusion of a non-VCP :)
>
>
>
> - Dan
>
>
>
> *From:* Anthony Holloway [mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com
> ]
> *Sent:*
Hello, I have only recently started dealing with PLM. For one large
deployment, it made some sense to build a standalone PLM virtual machine.
Following the documentation, I spun up the VM from the PLM 10.5 OVA, and
modified the vNIC MAC address to a static value before the installation of
the softw
Mike, I have not tried this, and it is a pretty recent doc, but take a look
at this and see if it might work for you, or at least save you part of the
configuration work:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/unified-communications/bulk-administration-tool/118882-config-vg-00.html
-Dave
On Mo
Disclaimer: I haven't deployed ISR4ks yet, not even in a lab environment to
try this out. However, the "Clocking" section on the following page seems
to disagree with something you've said. This page indicates there is a
"backplane clock" which certainly reads like a TDM bus. It's not clear what
it
Barry, if you have the q931 debug from when the error occurred, and if you
are able to share it, that may help shed light on the error. The mandatory
IE missing issue is an ISDN protocol error where the CUCM and telco switch
are in disagreement about something. It is sometimes possible to determine
Hefin, the locally created users are still going to be present, will still
use local authentication, and you can also continue to create additional
local users. Note: I believe this behavior began with version 10.0.
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/srnd/collab10/collab10/dire
ALERTING pd = 8 callref
> = 0x805D
> Progress Ind i = 0x8088 - In-band info or appropriate now
> available
> May 27 03:21:11.716: ISDN Se0/1/0:23 Q931: RX <- RELEASE_COMP pd = 8
> callref = 0x005D
> Cause i = 0x82E018 - Mandatory information element missing
> May 27 0
Matthew, do you happen to know when the servers were purchased, and when
the RAID card was replaced? Wondering if you are using a version of the
9271CV-8I card that is not new enough to have the fix for the various field
notice issues. I have definitely run into this with the C240M3 boxes that
use
Robert, I believe there is a service parameter for CallManager called
something like "Stop Routing on Unallocated Number Flag" which you could
change to False. While I haven't tried changing that to route past a 404
not found code on a SIP trunk to try the next route in a route list, I
believe it m
Scott, while I did not work on that particular part of the engagement, a
previous customer of mine used Telstrat. The phones were 79xx series
running SIP firmware, and it also supported secure recording of SRTP
streams. However, I can offer no comment or pros/cons of the software -
other than that
While I am not sure if this would impact whatever issue you are having, are
you running with the SIP normalization script provided in the following
doc? Also, you might want to look through the rest of this doc to look for
any other ideas:
http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/solutions/collateral/enter
I tried creating a dummy CTIRP with a DN of *5XXX and set it to CFA to
8XXX3101. That appears to be configurable (I did it on a test 10.5 box),
and when I check DNA it seems to indicate the correct pattern for the CFA.
However, when I did a quick test dialing out to *5123, I didn't get it to
ring 8
For anyone who has an environment with multiple mixed mode clusters (CTL
file is present), do you know of a way to move devices from one cluster to
another?
Using the eToken SAST (physical USB devices), it seems you can do this by
using the same signing token to sign the CTL file on each cluster.
56
>> 9 CERTIFICATE 961 76 5D 15 01 0E 41 0D 16 BE EA 8A 98 29 33 EE 27 B6 3E
>> D3 01 (SHA1 Hash HEX)
>> 10 IPADDRESS 4
>> This etoken was used to sign the CTL file.
>>
>>
>> admin:show cert own CallManager/CallManager.pem
>> [
>> Version:
n Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) wrote:
> Inline.
>
>
> -Ryan
>
> On Aug 12, 2015, at 11:23 PM, Dave Goodwin
> wrote:
>
> Ryan, let me lay out an example to make sure I understand. Please note
> that I haven't found anywhere that this
Jason, I have seen different behaviors from different central office
switches/providers; there doesn't seem to be a lot of consistency. I have
often had to rely on trial and error until I find the right combination -
and make sure to try dialing both land-based and mobile lines, as the
behavior on
I was able to make this work on a 9971 and 8841 using just the filename as
well - and verified it's important to un-check the box "enable end user to
access phone background." CUCM cluster is 8.6(2a)SU5.
Does anyone know of a way to make this functionality work on a 79xx series
phone, e.g. 7965? T
In a previous design project, what was learned from the CER product team
was that the CM version used by a CER Server Group is specific to that CER
Server Group only. It is allowed to have one single CER cluster comprised
of multiple CER Server Groups, where each group could be integrated with a
di
Jonathan, I got exactly the same error as that a few months ago. I was
doing a Migration task with PCD (not upgrade) to get from v6.1 up to v10.5,
so not the same scenario as you.
While I was never given a root cause (and collecting output from the
virtual serial port didn't actually seem to work
I had a similar symptom a couple months ago - discovery timed out on one or
more nodes. I found a supportforum post from another individual having that
issue, and it appeared that PCD got "stuck" installing
the ciscocm.ucmap_platformconfig.cop file in the middle. The way to work
around it was to lo
Has anyone performed an upgrade of a large cluster that uses Clustering
over the WAN from 8.6 to 10.5 that can share any lessons learned with that
specific type of scenario? The cluster is already virtual, has 16 nodes,
and is spread across 3 geographic areas. There is already a standalone PLM
on t
Is there anything wrong with adding voice-class sip bind commands to ALL
the voip dial-peers, and then set the global binding to the interface that
faces the ITSP requiring authentication (since it seems sip-ua REGISTER
messages use the global bind)?
-Dave
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Nick Bar
Dave, perhaps this is some variation on CSCuv04949 or CSCtr50458. I'm not
sure if you're using SRTP for the media, or just using SIP/TLS for the
signaling with RTP media. In any case, if you look at the list of caveats
in the CallManager 10.5(2)SU3a release notes - yes the CallManager release
notes
Scott, is the UCM cluster running in mixed mode? Do you know whether the
security settings were configured during the TSP installation the first
time? Here is some reading that explains the process, if you feel this may
apply to you.
*http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/security
As Brian stated, the cable properties of the copper makes a difference.
In terms of the Cisco device, this is the only thing I have seen recently
that talks about a specific distance. In this case it is longer than is
usually advertised (3.4km) for run-of-the-mill 26 AWG wire and it's only
with a
Agreed on the Connection Shuttle. I have used it and it's quite fast
compared to the alternative. I encourage you to read the tool help at the
link provided.
One important point is that the machine running Connection Shuttle requires
live connectivity to the source and target CUC servers. If you h
If you enable bpduguard it will err-disable the port(s) upon receipt of a
BPDU.
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 8:44 AM Stephen Welsh
wrote:
> I thought that this would be prevented by default because of spanning
> tree/BPDU, but it’s common practice to disable spanning tree for access
> ports (i.e. usi
What I have done in some past upgrades is to copy/paste everything on
Device Defaults page (or screen shot it). Deactivate TFTP service on all
nodes - so it can't even start following any necessary reboots. Install the
upgrade. Go back to Device Defaults page and set everything back how you
like it
If you believe D channel is up but B channels are not, what do you see that
makes you think that? If that's really the case, then logging of debug isdn
q921 and debug isdn q931 will usually help with examining what is going on.
-Dave
On Wednesday, February 25, 2015, Anthony Holloway <
avholloway+
It still exists - there is an Answer File Generator that builds a couple
XML files that you put onto a virtual floppy (.flp) and attach to the VM.
If everything has been done properly, no interaction inside the VM console
is necessary, just power on the VM(s) with the ISO and FLP attached and
wait.
Are you wanting this to all happen within DNS instead of happening within a
SIP UA? As far as I understand, if DNS redirected somewhere (SRV or CNAME
record for example) it would not change the destination URI the originator
is trying to reach. The SIP protocol has redirection codes (such as 301 or
It seems the PC you're using to run CCX Editor debugger is unable to
resolve the hostname 4559R.rap.local. Please ensure the PC is able to
resolve that hostname via the DNS server. If that is not possible you can
also add an entry into the PC's C:\Windows\System32\drivers\etc\hosts file
such as thi
Matthew, yes it is pretty new, and I have no setup with which to experiment
or test, but have you read this section of the CUC 12.x doc? It seems to
indicate CUC will still use Auto Discovery and in Step 6 it shows how to
enable that in O365.
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/conn
>
>>> Matthew Loraditch
>>> Sr. Network Engineer
>>> p: *443.541.1518* <443.541.1518>
>>> w: *www.heliontechnologies.com* <http://www.heliontechnologies.com/> |
>>> e: *mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com*
>>>
>>> [image:
68 matches
Mail list logo
