G.W. Haywood wrote:
> What you say is true. However it would be much clearer that you
> understand that your new milter breaks a lot of existing and even in
> some cases carefully crafted and well tested code on many mailservers
> if you had apologised for it once more instead of simply snipping t
Chris Moules wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback. I am using Postfix as MTA. Postfix does not have a
> 'quarantine queue' as such, it places messages on hold in the main queue.
>
> This is my first ever work with a Milter and I am more sys-admin than
> developer.
Good job then!
>> OTOH, a generic
Hi there,
On Tue, 3 Mar 2009 aCaB wrote:
> Chris Moules wrote:
>
> > I have been looking at the RC1 for ClamAV. With the rewrite of the
> > Milter it has removed one important (for us) feature. That is the
> > ability to notify clients that there mail has been intercepted.
>
> I think the quarant
aCaB wrote:
> Chris Moules wrote:
>> As an ISP here in Luxembourg we stand liable if we intercept and remove
>> mail without informing the client. Our current system informs the
>> recipient about filtered Virus mail and delivers UCE tagged (or
>> delivered to a Spam folder).
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> I
Chris Moules wrote:
> As an ISP here in Luxembourg we stand liable if we intercept and remove
> mail without informing the client. Our current system informs the
> recipient about filtered Virus mail and delivers UCE tagged (or
> delivered to a Spam folder).
Hi Chris,
I think the quarantine queue
Patch now on Bugzilla (sorry for the mess, not use to the submission process).
Bug: 1448
Chris
Chris Moules wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been looking at the RC1 for ClamAV. With the rewrite of the
> Milter it has removed one important (for us) feature. That is the
> ability to notify clients that
