I just upgraded my clamav installation from 0.75 to 0.80 on my RHEL 3.0
server. After merging my configuration changes, clamd is running fine.
However, I'm running into problems with freshclam:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# freshclam --datadir=/var/amavis/clamav
Jason Dixon wrote:
ERROR: Please edit the example config file /etc/freshclam.conf.
Comment out the example line?
ERROR: Can't open /var/amavis/clamav/logs/freshclam.log in append mode
(check permissions!).
Whom are the user and group in clamd.conf?
Matt
What exact version of zlib do you have installed? Upgrade to zlib 1.2.2.
1.1.4 is installed
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
Hi all,
since ClamAV reached v0.80, I am using it to scan and reject e-mail
messages. Today I noticed that ClamAV also detects phishing attacks.
Phishing is pure social engineering and poses no threat whatsoever in a
technical sense.
How can I configure ClamAV not to try to detect phishing and
Julian Mehnle wrote:
How can I configure ClamAV not to try to detect phishing and other
social engineering attacks?
Why? Your prerogative, obviously, but I am just curious.
Matt
___
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
On Nov 14, 2004, at 7:35 AM, Matt wrote:
Jason Dixon wrote:
ERROR: Please edit the example config file /etc/freshclam.conf.
Comment out the example line?
LOL!
Thanks Matt, that fixed it. /me smacks his head in disbelief.
--
Jason Dixon
DixonGroup Consulting
http://www.dixongroup.net
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 13:58:53 +0100
Julian Mehnle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
since ClamAV reached v0.80, I am using it to scan and reject e-mail
messages. Today I noticed that ClamAV also detects phishing attacks.
Phishing is pure social engineering and poses no threat whatsoever in
since ClamAV reached v0.80, I am using it to scan and reject e-mail
messages. Today I noticed that ClamAV also detects phishing attacks.
Phishing is pure social engineering and poses no threat whatsoever in a
technical sense.
I'm certainly *very* happy that ClamAV team have added more phishing
Steve Basford wrote:
since ClamAV reached v0.80, I am using it to scan and reject e-mail
messages. Today I noticed that ClamAV also detects phishing attacks.
Phishing is pure social engineering and poses no threat whatsoever in a
technical sense.
I'm certainly *very* happy that ClamAV team
Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Julian Mehnle wrote:
How can I configure ClamAV not to try to detect phishing and other
social engineering attacks?
Why? Your prerogative, obviously, but I am just curious.
For three reasons:
1. I consider filtering technically harmful messages for my users
On the issue of manually reviewing the mails to submitisn't this the
purpose of the quarantine directory? When it detects a phishing malware,
look at the file in the quarantine directory.
On Sunday 14 November 2004 8:57 am, Julian Mehnle wrote:
Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Julian
John Jolet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the issue of manually reviewing the mails to submitisn't this the
purpose of the quarantine directory? When it detects a phishing
malware, look at the file in the quarantine directory.
I also don't believe in quarantine directories, which have to be
On Nov 14, 2004, at 9:26 AM, Steve Basford wrote:
since ClamAV reached v0.80, I am using it to scan and reject e-mail
messages. Today I noticed that ClamAV also detects phishing attacks.
Phishing is pure social engineering and poses no threat whatsoever in
a
technical sense.
I'm certainly
On Nov 14, 2004, at 9:32 AM, Joe Maimon wrote:
Steve Basford wrote:
since ClamAV reached v0.80, I am using it to scan and reject e-mail
messages. Today I noticed that ClamAV also detects phishing attacks.
Phishing is pure social engineering and poses no threat whatsoever
in a
technical sense.
On Nov 14, 2004, at 10:01 AM, John Jolet wrote:
On the issue of manually reviewing the mails to submitisn't this
the
purpose of the quarantine directory? When it detects a phishing
malware,
look at the file in the quarantine directory.
I think he's thinking that this is more time and labor
On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 09:03:43PM -0500, Joe Maimon said:
Stephen Gran wrote:
On Thursday 11 November 2004 05:56 pm, Stephen Gran wrote:
So, when start-stop-daemon (or daemon) sends a kill signal, it ends up
signalling the wrong thread, and it takes a long time for the signal to
work.
Joe Maimon wrote:
I'm certainly *very* happy that ClamAV team have added more phishing
detections (thanks Trog et all).
Yes, you're correct it's social engineering but it doesn't stop
users clicking on the links
and downloading the keylogging trojan, from the remote site that the
phish email
BitFuzzy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So blocking [social engineering attacks] can only be seen as a good
thing.
I disagree, and I already explained why.
I don't even request that ClamAV completely stop detecting such stuff, I
just request that I have the option of disabling it.
On Sunday 14 November 2004 9:17 am, Julian Mehnle wrote:
John Jolet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the issue of manually reviewing the mails to submitisn't this the
purpose of the quarantine directory? When it detects a phishing
malware, look at the file in the quarantine directory.
I
John Jolet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 14 November 2004 9:17 am, Julian Mehnle wrote:
[...] I outright reject unwanted messages during the SMTP transaction,
so the sender gets notified. [...]
I would agree with that practice, except in this day and age of spoofed
addresses and
John Jolet wrote:
On Sunday 14 November 2004 9:17 am, Julian Mehnle wrote:
John Jolet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My
users can see what messages have been rejected by skimming over a list of
recently rejected messages once or twice a week (see an example here[1]).
This practice has proven to work
This is a me too. I am ABSOLUTELY in love with ClamAV due to the fact
it has gone beyond what most commercial AV players are doing, and is
incorporating scanning for phishing and spyware.
If you follow the industry, you will see that most AV vendors are
bringing out *separate* products to
22 matches
Mail list logo
