On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 02:34:14 GMT
Mark ad...@asarian-host.net articulated:
On 4/26/10 6:01 PM, Mark wrote:
I just upgraded to clamav 0.96.1 on FreeBSD 7. Everyhing seemed
to be running fine, except that I suddenly got this message in my
freshclam log:
WARNING: Clamd was NOT
On 04/22/2010 05:26 PM, Kris Deugau wrote:
I've had reports of several FPs due to PhishingScanURLs recently - is
there any way it can be made less aggressive rather than just turning it
off outright?
You could remove domains from daily.pdb/whitelist all mails that contain
certain domains.
* Simon Hobson wrote:
h...@dip-systems.de wrote:
After the last signature update, clam av stopped working on our woody
installation.
Is there no more support for this Debian Release?
No, according to certain people on this list, you are a cretin, and
incompetent to even handle the off
Nathan Gibbs wrote:
Unfortunately.
If an old Clamav was installed on a system that did a vital task, but could
basically be a set it and forget it system, the setup got shafted by the
ClamAV team.
No other way to call it.
To me this is an oxymoron vital task + set and forget Set and forget
Török Edwin wrote:
On 04/22/2010 05:26 PM, Kris Deugau wrote:
I've had reports of several FPs due to PhishingScanURLs recently - is
there any way it can be made less aggressive rather than just turning it
off outright?
You could remove domains from daily.pdb
I don't seem to have this as a
On 04/27/2010 08:57 PM, Kris Deugau wrote:
Török Edwin wrote:
On 04/22/2010 05:26 PM, Kris Deugau wrote:
I've had reports of several FPs due to PhishingScanURLs recently - is
there any way it can be made less aggressive rather than just turning it
off outright?
You could remove domains from
Török Edwin wrote:
Are you sure it was a Heuristics.Phishing.*, or Phishing.Heuristics.*
detection?
It doesn't look at the subject line at all.
Pretty certain; I don't recall the username so it's a bit hard to check
back in the mail logs.
What does the 17- at the end indicate?
It
On 04/27/2010 10:40 PM, Kris Deugau wrote:
*snort* ISP end-users running *nix? Well, maybe one or two out of
~50K... g
Well python runs on Windows as well, and there is even something like
py2exe which embeds a python intepreter with the script.
But its probably too much hassle to get even
Hi,
I'm using sa-v3.2.5 and amavisd with clamav-0.96 and it appears to be
working properly. clamdcheck periodically sends the eicar virus test
and clamd reports that it found it properly.
What is the best procedure for now integrating the sanesecurity
signatures? Are these ready for use on a
Hi,
I've done some research on the best way to integrate it, but hoped
someone could point me to a current document that outlines how to do
this and help me answer some of my questions.
The best way to integrate them is to follow the instructions at Steve's
web site (Sane Security).
* Jim Preston wrote:
To me this is an oxymoron vital task + set and forget Set and forget
solutions are for NON-VITAL tasks by the very statement of 'forget'.
Your opinion, which you are entitled to.
I'll agree to disagree with you.
:-)
it is up to THEM to ensure changes to the project
Nathan Gibbs wrote:
Here is what I absolutely do not like about this or agree with.
The very possibility of there being a kill sig. One specially crafted sig
could kill the virus protection on every server workstation in our company.
Allowing the ClamAV Team to remotely nuke a level of our
On Apr 27, 2010, at 3:23 PM, Sarocet wrote:
Nathan Gibbs wrote:
Here is what I absolutely do not like about this or agree with.
The very possibility of there being a kill sig. One specially
crafted sig
could kill the virus protection on every server workstation in
our company.
* Jim Preston wrote:
On Apr 27, 2010, at 3:23 PM, Sarocet wrote:
The ClamAV team didn't design the AV to stop on getting a special
signature.
That signature could exist due to a bug that you decided not to fix
(by not
updating/patching).
It was a clever use of a bug to disable the daemon.
I have a zip file of PDF files I'm trying to scan, the file is 2623701980
bytes. I've set all the Limits to 0 but still no joy. I'm running the
latest version, on Solaris 10, x86. I have a lot more files like this
coming soon and really need to get this working so any help would be
great.
On 28/04/2010 5.24, rick...@mm.com wrote:
I have a zip file of PDF files I'm trying to scan, the file is 2623701980
bytes. I've set all the Limits to 0 but still no joy. I'm running the
latest version, on Solaris 10, x86. I have a lot more files like this
coming soon and really need to get
On 21/04/2010 13.54, h...@dip-systems.de wrote:
After the last signature update, clam av stopped working on our woody
installation.
Is there no more support for this Debian Release?
NO!
woody was released in 2002 (8 years ago)
they stopped releasing security updates on Jun 2006 (4 year
17 matches
Mail list logo
