[Clamav-users] Re: network scanning questions

2004-03-09 Thread Starbane
Charles Sprickman wrote: On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, Chris Meadors wrote: International Center for Alcohol Policies? Now what exactly will the new version of ClamAV be doing? :) Hopefully it will work well enough that no one will have to modify their drinking habits. Maybe

[Clamav-users] Re: duh, ignore my last question

2004-03-05 Thread Starbane
Jim Maul wrote: my apologies, it was almost 5pm on a friday and for some reason i asked if sendmail supports maildirs. musta been a brain fart cause obviously thats not the mta's job. Feel free to point and laugh. Thanks Jim Since we're sharing, I recently spent an hour trying to figure out why

[Clamav-users] Re: password-protected Worm.Bagle.H

2004-03-04 Thread Starbane
Erik Corry wrote: The question is how much of a problem it really is. Are users really that dumb? The sad answer to this question has so far been a resounding Yes in every scenario so far. :( --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux

[Clamav-users] Amavisd-new, Debian and Worm.Bagle.F-zippwd-3 other password protected viruses

2004-03-04 Thread Starbane
This has probably been covered somewhere, so for those who already know this, forgive the reiteration. If you are running Debian with Amavisd-new and Clamav, you will need to upgrade (for example, apt-get install -t unstable amavisd-new) to the newest version of amavisd-new (20030616p7-3 as of

[Clamav-users] Re: Archive Not Working?

2004-03-04 Thread Starbane
Rod Furey wrote: I second this. The amount of mail I'm getting from the list has gotten to the point where I want to use the web interface to look at things (like I do with the Linux-390 list - lots of traffic there too). And this is with me getting the digests... Ta muchly... Rod This was

[Clamav-users] Re: virus not detected one but detected on another machine

2004-03-02 Thread Starbane
russ wrote: On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 12:21, P.V.Anthony wrote: The only diffrence I can see is that on machine A I installed clamav 0.65 then installed 0.67. So what part of 0.67 works better and I should install it on machine A are you missing? Is there anything else I can do or check? Check

[Clamav-users] Re: Worm.SomeFool is this w32/Netsky.b@MM

2004-02-18 Thread Starbane
Considering the speed at which this was added to the database (and the last three major mail worms that got treated similarly) I'm just terribly impressed with the ClamAV devs. So far, Clamav has beaten our proprietary av solution (InoculateIT, or eTrust Antivirus, or whatever CA is calling it

[Clamav-users] Re: Clamscan -m segfault , possibly a big problem

2004-02-16 Thread Starbane
Tomasz Papszun wrote: On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 at 22:34:09 -0700, Starbane wrote: [...] --- SCAN SUMMARY --- Known viruses: 41374 ^ You've got some superfluous database files. There are only 20718 signatures currently. Maybe you've got old format database files left

[Clamav-users] Re: TNEF?

2004-02-16 Thread Starbane
Tommy McNeely wrote: Just curious... I have all these Outlook users who claim they need TNEF files to not be blocked anymore, does clamav directly un-encode them for scanning, or do I need to get a perl module or external executable? Ask your Outlook users what they think the TNEF attachments do,

[Clamav-users] Re: clamav-0.66 for Zaurus 5600 - ERROR: Verification:Broken or not a CVD file

2004-02-15 Thread Starbane
I had this exact same problem when a filter was interfering with freshclam's virus def downloads. Seems Dansguardian content filter sees the virus definition files as threatening. When adding the ip of the freshclam-er, downloads went fine. IMO, the error message is a little too vague to

[Clamav-users] Clamscan -m segfault , possibly a big problem

2004-02-15 Thread Starbane
I was recently using clamscan on cli to scan -m /home/*/Maildir, because of some odd problems with sockets causing clamdscan to segfault on my mail gateway (which probably allowed some Worm.SCO.A files through, since we've been getting so many lately). On one particular email, clamscan would

[Clamav-users] Re: Clamscan -m segfault , possibly a big problem

2004-02-15 Thread Starbane
After compiling 0.67, the segfault has gone away. After I wiped the egg off my face, I felt much better. Kudos to the ClamAV project team once again! :) --- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps

[Clamav-users] Re: Doomjuice.A

2004-02-10 Thread Starbane
Antony Stone wrote: On Tuesday 10 February 2004 11:23 am, Carles Xavier Munyoz Baldó wrote: Hi, I have received a notification that a new variation of Worm.SCO.A called Doomjuice.A is about to appear. Any news about it ? Is the Doomjuice.A virus signature in the ClamAV last Virus DataBase

[Clamav-users] Re: debian / new database format

2004-02-09 Thread Starbane
Donovan Craig wrote: Hi, I'm trying to install clamav 0.65-2 with amavis Exim etc.. on a Debian woody/sarge mixed system. When I go to install clamav, I get the following: --- Setting up clamav-freshclam (0.65-2) ... Starting database update It takes freshclam ~3min to timeout and

[Clamav-users] Re: debian / new database format

2004-02-09 Thread Starbane
Donovan Craig wrote: Hi, I'm trying to install clamav 0.65-2 with amavis Exim etc.. on a Debian woody/sarge mixed system. Here's a temp solution using the debian way: Add this to /etc/apt/preferences Package: clamav Pin: version 0.65-1 Pin-Priority: 1001 Package: clamav-base Pin: version

[Clamav-users] Re: debian / new database format

2004-02-09 Thread Starbane
Donovan Craig wrote: Hi, I'm trying to install clamav 0.65-2 with amavis Exim etc.. on a Debian woody/sarge mixed system. When I go to install clamav, I get the following: Just found, with my last post (about /etc/apt/preferences) you may want to add identical lines for clamav-freshclam and

[Clamav-users] Re: debian / new database format

2004-02-09 Thread Starbane
Thomas Lamy wrote: The bug is actually in libclamav1_0.65-2, so it should be sufficient to pinpoint that one. Imagine my chagrin when I found that. ;) --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools

[Clamav-users] Re: debian / new database format

2004-02-09 Thread Starbane
Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: Is there another AV that has apt? AFAIK most vendors provide generic linux binary, not Debian binary. Bitdefender seems to provide .debs, anyway. Not as good as APT, (dpkg -i, I may as well run RPM at that point) but it's better than downloading a binary and dealing

[Clamav-users] Re: debian / new database format

2004-02-09 Thread Starbane
Thomas Lamy wrote: Starbane wrote: Starbane wrote: Donovan Craig wrote: Hi, I'm trying to install clamav 0.65-2 with amavis Exim etc.. on a Debian woody/sarge mixed system. When I go to install clamav, I get the following: Just found, with my last post (about /etc/apt/preferences) you