On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 18:00:19 -0500
René Berber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The idea of Cygwin is to be able to build with the same sources used
under Linux. Of course there are problem areas, those are few, and the
Cygwin maintainers/package porters should take care of them.
My recommendation
Could anyone please advise of a download site for the binary program for Clamav
0.94 for AIX 5.2, AIX5.3 and AIX 6.1.
Thank You
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 18:14:24 -0500
René Berber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do we get back support for Cygwin?
Hello René,
we generally had not so good experience with Cygwin based builds of ClamAV
over the past few years. The most common problem was different detection
results depending on the
Hi , I have a mail server with :
Debian etch
Postfix
Mailscanner
Clamav
Yesterday it work fine catching virus, but todat i've made an upgrade from
clamav 0.93 to 0.94 and then
the process stop catching mail with virus, i mean , the mails are stoped
anyway by No programs allowed with mailscanner
Jose Julian Buda wrote:
Hi , I have a mail server with :
Debian etch
Postfix
Mailscanner
Clamav
Yesterday it work fine catching virus, but todat i've made an upgrade from
clamav 0.93 to 0.94 and then
the process stop catching mail with virus, i mean , the mails are stoped
anyway by No
- Original Message -
From: Noel Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ClamAV users ML clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 1:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav 0.94
Jose Julian Buda wrote:
Hi , I have a mail server with :
Debian etch
Postfix
Mailscanner
Jose Julian Buda wrote:
proxymails:~# clamscan filewitheicar.txt
filewitheicar.txt: Eicar-Test-Signature FOUND
--- SCAN SUMMARY ---
Known viruses: 416228
Engine version: 0.94
Scanned directories: 0
Scanned files: 1
Infected files: 1
Data scanned: 0.00 MB
Time: 2.187
Noel Jones wrote:
Jose Julian Buda wrote:
proxymails:~# clamscan filewitheicar.txt
filewitheicar.txt: Eicar-Test-Signature FOUND
--- SCAN SUMMARY ---
Known viruses: 416228
Engine version: 0.94
Scanned directories: 0
Scanned files: 1
Infected files: 1
Data scanned: 0.00
- Original Message -
From: Rick Macdougall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ClamAV users ML clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 2:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav 0.94
Noel Jones wrote:
Jose Julian Buda wrote:
proxymails:~# clamscan filewitheicar.txt
Jose Julian Buda wrote:
you mean it`s a mailscanner problem?
Thank you
Jose Jlian Buda
Yes, it's a mailscanner problem.
I suspect that mailscanner is using some no-longer-valid
command line switch with clamscan, but that's just a wild
guess. Mailscanner does not use clamd or
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 18:14:24 -0500
René Berber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do we get back support for Cygwin?
Hello René,
we generally had not so good experience with Cygwin based builds of ClamAV
over the past few years. The most common problem was different detection
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Noel Jones
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 2:31 PM
To: ClamAV users ML
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav 0.94
Jose Julian Buda wrote:
you mean it`s a mailscanner problem
Török Edwin wrote:
[snip]
I built 0.94rc1 myself on cygwin, and confirmed this.
For some reason lstat() works with 0.94 ... after we dropped cygwin support.
Weird isn't it?
No, programming is deterministic, something changed in the code.
My guess is that one of the C_CYGWIN
On 2008-09-03 01:39, René Berber wrote:
Brandon Perry wrote:
IIRC, the announcement said that POSIX breakage would happen if you tried to
compile 0.94 on cygwin...
If you mean this part :
** This version drops the special support for Cygwin. Our QA process showed
** serious
On 2008-09-03 04:09, René Berber wrote:
Hello,
Sorry for the long post.
The following command and error stops clamav build, any ideas?
gcc -shared -Wl,-h -Wl,libclamav.so.5 -o .libs/libclamav.so.5.0.1
.libs/matcher-ac.o .libs/matcher-bm.o .libs/matcher.o .libs/md5.o
.libs/others.o
Török Edwin wrote:
[snip]
Have a look at bb #1139 for an example: lstat() failing for no apparent
reason.
The problems with lstat() are well known, and it doesn't fail randomly.
But your point is that it affects clamav; I have never seen that
particular failure, and I test
Török Edwin wrote:
[snip]
Please remove one of the 'uniq_get' entries in libclamav.map.
That worked, thanks.
--
René Berber
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
René Berber wrote:
The problems with lstat() are well known, and it doesn't fail randomly.
Oops! sorry, lstat() doesn't have problems, I was thinking of lseek().
If a lstat() problem was reported the usual cause is (just like in
Unix/Linux):
1. Permission problems;
2. File system problems
On 2008-09-03 13:07, René Berber wrote:
$ clamdscan ../test/clam.exe
/home/rberber/Projects/clamav-0.94/test/../test/clam.exe:
ClamAV-Test-File FOUND
--- SCAN SUMMARY ---
Infected files: 1
Time: 0.109 sec (0 m 0 s)
What is supposed to not do? Or you meant run it
Török Edwin wrote:
[snip]
Try the same with 0.94rc1, it doesn't work with relative paths, it shows:
../test/clam.exe: lstat() failed. ERROR
Nope, clamdscan doesn't work at all :
$ clamdscan -V
ClamAV 0.94rc1/8145/Wed Sep 3 01:00:57 2008
$ clamdscan clam.exe
clam.exe: lstat() failed. ERROR
On 2008-09-03 22:54, René Berber wrote:
Török Edwin wrote:
[snip]
Try the same with 0.94rc1, it doesn't work with relative paths, it shows:
../test/clam.exe: lstat() failed. ERROR
Nope, clamdscan doesn't work at all :
$ clamdscan -V
ClamAV 0.94rc1/8145/Wed Sep 3 01:00:57 2008
On Ubuntu 8.04, make check fails with:
gcc -DSRCDIR=\/root/clamav-0.94/unit_tests\ -g -O2 -o .libs/check_clamav
check_clamav-check_clamav.o check_clamav-check_jsnorm.o
check_clamav-check_str.o check_clamav-check_regex.o
check_clamav-check_disasm.o check_clamav-check_uniq.o
On 2008-09-02 19:06, Brandon Perry wrote:
On Ubuntu 8.04, make check fails with:
gcc -DSRCDIR=\/root/clamav-0.94/unit_tests\ -g -O2 -o .libs/check_clamav
check_clamav-check_clamav.o check_clamav-check_jsnorm.o
check_clamav-check_str.o check_clamav-check_regex.o
check_clamav-check_disasm.o
Ok, make check works. valgrind check fails, but that is't an issue to me.
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Brandon Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Run apt-get install check.
Compiles fine obviously. After doing make uninstall and make install,
running freshclam says that I am still
Run apt-get install check.
Compiles fine obviously. After doing make uninstall and make install,
running freshclam says that I am still running 0.94-exp, not 0.94.
Running
freshclam from the source dir says the same thing:
Did you configure with --enable-experimental?
Yes, I used
Hi Everyone,
My apologies for sending this again if you've already read this. It's a
reminder for those
who may have missed it last week.
The next ClamAV users webcast will be tomorrow at 1700GMT
(1800BST; 1900CEST; 1300EDT).
The presentation, given by Török Edwin, will cover the new features
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:clamav-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brandon Perry
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 12:06 PM
To: ClamAV users ML
Subject: [Clamav-users] ClamAV 0.94 release
Configuring on CentOS 5.2 x64 produces the following warnings
To: ClamAV users ML
Subject: [Clamav-users] ClamAV 0.94 release
Configuring on CentOS 5.2 x64 produces the following warnings:
# ./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc --enable-experimental \
--enable-milter
checking for CHECK... no
configure: WARNING: unable to find 'check' using
On 2008-09-02 21:44, Jason Bertoch wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:clamav-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brandon Perry
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 12:06 PM
To: ClamAV users ML
Subject: [Clamav-users] ClamAV 0.94 release
Configuring
Hi,
Something changed in configure which results on a wrong setting for the
existence of gethostbyname_r, it worked fine on 0.94rc1, now it doesn't
build unless using the following.
Simple solution: add '--disable-gethostbyname_r' to configure line.
I haven't found what changed and how the
IIRC, the announcement said that POSIX breakage would happen if you tried to
compile 0.94 on cygwin...
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 4:16 PM, René Berber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Something changed in configure which results on a wrong setting for the
existence of gethostbyname_r, it worked fine
From the announcement:
** This version drops the special support for Cygwin. Our QA process showed
** serious problems with ClamAV builds under Cygwin due to some low-level
** incompatibilities in the POSIX compatibility layer, resulting in
unreliable
** ClamAV behaviour.
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at
Brandon Perry wrote:
IIRC, the announcement said that POSIX breakage would happen if you tried to
compile 0.94 on cygwin...
If you mean this part :
** This version drops the special support for Cygwin. Our QA process showed
** serious problems with ClamAV builds under Cygwin due to some
René Berber wrote:
serious problems ? Only problem is the test I mentioned, passing a
file descriptor is not supported under Cygwin as far as I know.
I have no cygwin experience, but Windows *does* allow passing file
descriptors to child process. Not in the same way as unix, but I'd find
Sarocet wrote:
René Berber wrote:
serious problems ? Only problem is the test I mentioned, passing a
file descriptor is not supported under Cygwin as far as I know.
I have no cygwin experience, but Windows *does* allow passing file
descriptors to child process. Not in the same way as
Hello,
Sorry for the long post.
The following command and error stops clamav build, any ideas?
gcc -shared -Wl,-h -Wl,libclamav.so.5 -o .libs/libclamav.so.5.0.1
.libs/matcher-ac.o .libs/matcher-bm.o .libs/matcher.o .libs/md5.o
.libs/others.o .libs/readdb.o .libs/cvd.o .libs/dsig.o .libs/str.o
Additional info:
gcc is version 3.4.6, ld in not GNU ld, it is Sun's version 5.9-1.378 .
In fact, ld's -M parameter seems to have different meaning, and it also
could be a bug (ld itself added the symbol twice).
--
René Berber
___
Help us build a
37 matches
Mail list logo
