On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 19:25, Derek Currie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This list is incredible. Rudeness deluxe. Forgettable.
I don't suppose you've considered that you're the common element in
all of that. Probably not. Easier to blame the list (that had
extremely few problems with rudeness
On Sat, 2008-12-06 at 17:29 -0800, Dennis Peterson wrote:
Derek Currie wrote:
On Dec 6, 2008, at 12/06, 7:26 PM, Dennis Peterson wrote:
There is
no naming standard.
Again with the misinformation. There is, in fact, a naming standard,
Prove it.
and an organization designated to
On Dec 8, 2008, at 12/08, 9:29 AM, Daniel J McDonald wrote:
Again with the misinformation. There is, in fact, a naming standard,
Prove it.
Another person in my 'ignore' list. Get lost little troll.
This list is incredible. Rudeness deluxe. Forgettable.
===
:-Derek Currie
What then is the benefit of Clamav on the Mac platform?
same reason why it's on Linux.. to protect windows users.
Yes, but I already acknowledged that, as found in the next sentence
of my post:
actually, that quote you refer to is from a completely separate post.
One which I hadn't read
On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 18:24:28 -0500
Derek Currie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- A pile of provoking rubbish.
I obviously know more about the subject than you, and have been
doing all the work to change the situation. Meanwhile, do please
enjoy sitting back and making fun of the world to which you
On Dec 6, 2008, at 12/06,10:26 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In any case, I believe, mac users should come out of their self
imposed
complacence
Totally fur shur. I've seen an infection site, and my pal at the local
Apple Store has seen a Trojan OSX.RSPlug infection on a customer's
Hi there,
On Fri, 5 Dec 2008 a self-confessed ClamAV Newbie wrote:
I has been remarkably hard to find what malware are in Clamav's
Definitions List.
This is an Open Source project. Have you considered sending a patch
for the documentation?
http://www.clamav.net/doc/latest/
At last having
On Dec 6, 2008, at 12/06, 6:38 AM, G.W. Haywood wrote:
- A pile of provoking rubbish.
Do your homework first
I obviously know more about the subject than you, and have been doing
all the work to change the situation. Meanwhile, do please enjoy
sitting back and making fun of the world to
Derek Currie wrote:
Greetings folks,
This is a reply to a thread started way back in April of 2008 (when
it used to have the unfortunate subject line Non-Windoze Viruses).
Concerning the controversy about whether Clamav has definitions for
Mac OS X malware, I managed to find the
On Dec 6, 2008, at 12/06, 7:26 PM, Dennis Peterson wrote:
There is
no naming standard.
Again with the misinformation. There is, in fact, a naming standard,
and an organization designated to provide those names. Whether an
anti-malware provider chooses to use the official name is up to
Derek Currie wrote:
On Dec 6, 2008, at 12/06, 7:26 PM, Dennis Peterson wrote:
There is
no naming standard.
Again with the misinformation. There is, in fact, a naming standard,
and an organization designated to provide those names. Whether an
anti-malware provider chooses to use the
I have been meaning to write about it and the post from Derek Currie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and the posts it has generated on the subject is very welcome indeed.
One of the causes that Mac malware is not in the clamAV database has been
identified by Derek C:
This most likely is because Clamav is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In any case, I believe, mac users should come out of their self imposed
complacence and should be encouraged to upload the threats that they find to
clamAV database and that to happen Macintosh clamAV users should spread the
word on all Macintosh forums that they
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Dec 4, 2008, at 12/04, 8:21 PM, I wrote:
What then is the benefit of Clamav on the Mac platform?
On Dec 4, 2008, at 12/04, 10:27 PM, Spiro Harvey wrote:
same reason why it's on Linux.. to protect windows users.
Yes, but I already
Greetings folks,
This is a reply to a thread started way back in April of 2008 (when
it used to have the unfortunate subject line Non-Windoze Viruses).
Concerning the controversy about whether Clamav has definitions for
Mac OS X malware, I managed to find the answer is YES, but only sort of.
What then is the benefit of Clamav on the Mac platform?
same reason why it's on Linux.. to protect windows users.
It's my experience that malware and virus scares for Macs are bogus.
I work for an ISP and we have ClamAV and the sendmail milter running to
scan all incoming and outgoing
Spiro Harvey wrote:
No doubt some people run mail servers on OS-X that are delivering mail
to windows users, so it is possible for those people to run clam.
I used to build very nice headless Mac Mini mail MTA's for rapid
deployment at corporate acquisitions. They work very well running
17 matches
Mail list logo
