Unsubscribe
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 8:58 AM Joe Acquisto-j4
wrote:
>
> > Perhaps you should look into MailScanner and MailWatch. Mailscanner
> (package
> > for Suse available) will handle the interaction with spamassassin and
> clamd
> > (as well as other A/V solutions) and MailWatch provides a
> Perhaps you should look into MailScanner and MailWatch. Mailscanner (package
> for Suse available) will handle the interaction with spamassassin and clamd
> (as well as other A/V solutions) and MailWatch provides a nice GUI for
> quarantine and archive. Once set they just work.
>
> Rick
>
Perhaps you should look into MailScanner and MailWatch. Mailscanner (package
for Suse available) will handle the interaction with spamassassin and clamd
(as well as other A/V solutions) and MailWatch provides a nice GUI for
quarantine and archive. Once set they just work.
Rick
Joe Acquisto-j4
Citeren Matus UHLAR - fantomas :
you can use amavisd-new, as milter (using amavisd-milter) or maybe postfix
content_filter (but that's post-queue which means you can't reject it
anymore and sending bounces is not safe)
Postfix has also a smtpd_proxy_filter, which does basically the same
as
This has probably drifted as far OT for this list as it should go.
Welcome to the delights of running your own mail server. I've been
doing it for over a quarter of a century, and I wouldn't have it any
other way, but it ain't all roses. Perhaps you could share with us
why you feel the need to
Hi there,
On Wed, 24 Feb 2021, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
... limited familiarity ...
Of course. It all takes time and neurone cycles.
There's a simple-minded but reasonable view of the milter API at
https://howto.lintel.in/what-is-milter/
which has a useful diagram although it's inaccurate.
On 2/24/21 9:47 AM, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
Back OT, my post was about dealing with items that have already
been processed and are in the posfix HOLD queue, per the action of
clamav-milter, waiting for disposition in some way.
Hypothetically, a milter, such as clamav-milter, could say:
```
On 2/24/21 9:56 AM, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
Thanks. Workable.
*nod*
Ah. Well I did not mean to suggest the milter should "manage"
the postfix queue at all, but could alter any "directive" as to
disposition. The log messages I noticed, for "infected" mail
(/var/log/mail) seem to suggest
> On 2/24/21 6:26 AM, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
>> For now I will settle on a cron job script that peeks at the hold queue
>> every so often and alerts someone (me) with an alert.
>
> *nod*nod*
>
> I have a daily cron job that runs a script which shows me:
>
>- Number of messages which are:
. . .
> This has probably drifted as far OT for this list as it should go.
> Welcome to the delights of running your own mail server. I've been
> doing it for over a quarter of a century, and I wouldn't have it any
> other way, but it ain't all roses. Perhaps you could share with us
> why you
On 2/24/21 6:26 AM, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
For now I will settle on a cron job script that peeks at the hold queue
every so often and alerts someone (me) with an alert.
*nod*nod*
I have a daily cron job that runs a script which shows me:
- Number of messages which are:
- Normally
Hi there,
On Wed, 24 Feb 2021, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
I tend to agree with the "NO" votes. But, in the postfix "FILTER_README"
the author(s) suggest it is not a great idea, these days, to send the email
back to the sender, as the sender is very likely to be "spoofed".
You need to understand
>> Citeren Joe Acquisto-j4 :
>>
>>> Another question from the peanut gallery (a kids TV show reference from
>>> the 1950's. Which should tell you something) . . .
>>>
>>> With a local test email EICAR is detected and fed back to postfix.
>>> Ends up in hold queue as you would expect as
>>>
Hi there,
On Wed, 24 Feb 2021, Andrew C Aitchison via clamav-users wrote:
On Tue, 23 Feb 2021, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
Wondering now what people generally do with infected mail? That is, is
there a general consensus?
Would it be "safe" (for the systems) to simply send the mail through, to
On Tue, 23 Feb 2021, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
Wondering now what people generally do with infected mail? That is, is there a
general consensus?
Would it be "safe" (for the systems) to simply send the mail through, to the end
use and merely tag the subject line with "Virus Detected" as SPAM
> Citeren Joe Acquisto-j4 :
>
>> Another question from the peanut gallery (a kids TV show reference from
>> the 1950's. Which should tell you something) . . .
>>
>> With a local test email EICAR is detected and fed back to postfix.
>> Ends up in hold queue as you would expect as
>> per below
Citeren Joe Acquisto-j4 :
Another question from the peanut gallery (a kids TV show reference from
the 1950's. Which should tell you something) . . .
With a local test email EICAR is detected and fed back to postfix.
Ends up in hold queue as you would expect as
per below as /var/log/mail says:
Another question from the peanut gallery (a kids TV show reference from
the 1950's. Which should tell you something) . . .
With a local test email EICAR is detected and fed back to postfix.
Ends up in hold queue as you would expect as
per below as /var/log/mail says: (snipped)
18 matches
Mail list logo
