Re: [Clamav-users] Email viruses almost non-existent?

2007-12-31 Thread Paul Kosinski
In reply to various responses: We haven't reconfigured our local or domain Postfix mail servers recently to do graylisting etc., but in April we moved from a shared Web host to a dedicated computer for our domain (iment.com). At that time, we installed a what was perhaps a newer Postfix as our

Re: [Clamav-users] Email viruses almost non-existent?

2007-12-31 Thread Dennis Peterson
Paul Kosinski wrote: In reply to various responses: We haven't reconfigured our local or domain Postfix mail servers recently to do graylisting etc., but in April we moved from a shared Web host to a dedicated computer for our domain (iment.com). At that time, we installed a what was

Re: [Clamav-users] Email viruses almost non-existent?

2007-12-28 Thread G.W. Haywood
Hi there, On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 Brian Read wrote: I use a number of smeservers (aka e-smith), which all use clamav to scan incoming emails. Up to (and including) version 6 I got plenty of hits from clamav. As I upgraded to version 7, the clamav hits subsided to only phishing emails being

Re: [Clamav-users] Email viruses almost non-existent?

2007-12-28 Thread Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães
Xavier Beaudouin escreveu: Hello, In December 2006, we were running ClamAV 0.88.7, and there were still a fair number of real viruses being detected in inbound email. Now running 0.91.2 and 0.92, there seem to be only phishing attempts, and not even very many of them. In fact it seems that

Re: [Clamav-users] Email viruses almost non-existent?

2007-12-27 Thread Luis Miguel R.
El Monday, 24 December del 2007 a las 10:55:51AM, Dennis Peterson escribió: Paul Kosinski wrote: In December 2006, we were running ClamAV 0.88.7, and there were still a fair number of real viruses being detected in inbound email. Now running 0.91.2 and 0.92, there seem to be only phishing

Re: [Clamav-users] Email viruses almost non-existent?

2007-12-27 Thread Brian Read
G.W. Haywood wrote: Hi there, On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 Paul Kosinski wrote: In December 2006, we were running ClamAV 0.88.7, and there were still a fair number of real viruses being detected in inbound email. Now running 0.91.2 and 0.92, there seem to be only phishing attempts, and not even

Re: [Clamav-users] Email viruses almost non-existent?

2007-12-27 Thread John Rudd
Luis Miguel R. wrote: El Monday, 24 December del 2007 a las 10:55:51AM, Dennis Peterson escribió: Paul Kosinski wrote: In December 2006, we were running ClamAV 0.88.7, and there were still a fair number of real viruses being detected in inbound email. Now running 0.91.2 and 0.92, there seem

Re: [Clamav-users] Email viruses almost non-existent?

2007-12-27 Thread Brian Read
John Rudd wrote: Luis Miguel R. wrote: El Monday, 24 December del 2007 a las 10:55:51AM, Dennis Peterson escribió: Paul Kosinski wrote: In December 2006, we were running ClamAV 0.88.7, and there were still a fair number of real viruses being detected in inbound email. Now running 0.91.2 and

Re: [Clamav-users] Email viruses almost non-existent?

2007-12-25 Thread G.W. Haywood
Hi there, On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 Paul Kosinski wrote: In December 2006, we were running ClamAV 0.88.7, and there were still a fair number of real viruses being detected in inbound email. Now running 0.91.2 and 0.92, there seem to be only phishing attempts, and not even very many of them. In

Re: [Clamav-users] Email viruses almost non-existent?

2007-12-25 Thread Jan-Pieter Cornet
Paul Kosinski wrote: In December 2006, we were running ClamAV 0.88.7, and there were still a fair number of real viruses being detected in inbound email. Now running 0.91.2 and 0.92, there seem to be only phishing attempts, and not even very many of them. In fact it seems that our log

Re: [Clamav-users] Email viruses almost non-existent?

2007-12-24 Thread Dennis Peterson
Paul Kosinski wrote: In December 2006, we were running ClamAV 0.88.7, and there were still a fair number of real viruses being detected in inbound email. Now running 0.91.2 and 0.92, there seem to be only phishing attempts, and not even very many of them. In fact it seems that our log file