Re: [clamav-users] (no subject)

Hello, I’m using clamwin antivirus on windows server 2003 but now I can’t update anymore. You probably can use ClamAV for Windows (https://www.clamav.net/downloads) and start learning how it works in command line. -- Cordialement / Best regards, Arnaud Jacques Gérant de SecuriteInfo.com

Re: [clamav-users] (no subject)

ClamWin is not a ClamAV product. They use our engine, but we don’t make it. ClamWin needs to update to a more current version of ClamAV, they are very far behind. — Sent from my  iPad > On Mar 6, 2021, at 21:54, Tech Support via clamav-users > wrote: > >  > Hi, > > > I’m using

Re: [clamav-users] (No Subject)

I'm told that the current implementation for VirusEvent in clamd doesn't play well with OnAccess scanning due to the way clamd and OnAccess use threads and the way the current VirusEvent feature relies on forking. VirusEvent was disabled when used with OnAccess until a better implementation

Re: [clamav-users] (no subject)

Welcome 1. Please see the documentation: https://www.clamav.net/documents/installing-clamav bash # yum install -y epel-release # yum install -y clamav 2. This is not clamav related. Though: You can use " yum install yum-plugin-downloadonly" to enable you to download the packages on another

Re: [clamav-users] (no subject)

for the sake of archives and readers: can mailing lists please start to reject posts with braindead "(no subject)" and people learn to compose readable mails where answers are not randomly on top, bottom and dozen times signatures quoted? i could puke each time someone replies to this thread

Re: [clamav-users] (no subject)

wget database.clamav.net/daily.cvd for the daily updates. On 12/6/2017 12:03 PM, George wrote: Thanks, but this doesn't update the daily.cvd. Should I wait for you to fix the mirros or can I do something myself? Sorry for bothering you, but if there was some guide on what to do in such cases, I

Re: [clamav-users] (no subject)

Thanks, but this doesn't update the daily.cvd. Should I wait for you to fix the mirros or can I do something myself? Sorry for bothering you, but if there was some guide on what to do in such cases, I would use it myself. Best regards, George 2017-12-06 18:32 GMT+02:00 Thomas McCourt (tmccourt)

Re: [clamav-users] (no subject)

Hello, Yeah, run the wget command Wget database.clamav.net/main.cvd That should download it Thanks, Tom On 12/6/17, 11:18 AM, "clamav-users on behalf of George" wrote: >wget >database.clamav.net/main.cvd'

Re: [clamav-users] (no subject)

Hi Tom, Thanks for this timely reply. Could you provide a solution or link to update the database by myself? Best regards, George 2017-12-06 16:57 GMT+02:00 Thomas McCourt (tmccourt) : > Hello George, > > I will look into those mirrors to see if they are down. IF a mirror

Re: [clamav-users] (no subject)

Hello George, I will look into those mirrors to see if they are down. IF a mirror is not working, it should look to find another one. You could also try 'wget database.clamav.net/main.cvd' To see if it manually downloads it that way, then drop the file in the location We have been working

Re: [clamav-users] (no subject)

Hey, Firstly, this is a permissions issue with the freshclam.log file. I would verify that clamav can write to the log file and see what you have the permissions of that file as. IF you created the clamav user when you first installed clamav, you might need to chown the file with the clamav

Re: [clamav-users] (no subject)

> ERROR: Can't open /var/log/clamav/freshclam.log in append mode (check > permissions!). > ERROR: Problem with internal logger (UpdateLogFile = > /var/log/clamav/freshclam.log). I expect you solved this already? > WARNING: getpatch: Can't download daily-24011.cdiff from db.local.clamav.net

Re: [clamav-users] (no subject)

Am 10.03.2017 um 02:50 schrieb Benny Pedersen: Reindl Harald skrev den 2017-03-10 00:42: guess what the list-footer is for (idiot - since every day anotehr one like you does the same bullshit mailing to a list of hunredts or thounsands of people) what was your point of reply public here and

Re: [clamav-users] (no subject)

These come in spurts. When we suddenly get a rash of 50-100 new people on the list for whatever reason, we get one or two of these. Part of being a member of a community. It sucks that we have these every now and again, and it can be annoying, but we just guide them to the exit and call

Re: [clamav-users] (no subject)

Reindl Harald skrev den 2017-03-10 00:42: guess what the list-footer is for (idiot - since every day anotehr one like you does the same bullshit mailing to a list of hunredts or thounsands of people) what was your point of reply public here and still complaining of abuse, hmm very clever

Re: [clamav-users] (no subject)

guess what the list-footer is for (idiot - since every day anotehr one like you does the same bullshit mailing to a list of hunredts or thounsands of people) > clamav-users mailing list > clamav-users@lists.clamav.net > http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users Am

Re: [clamav-users] (no subject)

You must do that for yourself near the bottom of this page: . -Al- On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 08:04 AM, bijan gilani wrote: > > Please take me off of your list. Unsubscribe me. > > Bijan Gilani smime.p7s Description: S/MIME

Re: [clamav-users] (no subject)

>LibClamaV Warning: fmap_readpage : preadfail : asked for 4085 >bytes@offset11, got 0 An old post but hopefully advice is still sound... http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/users/50788 Cheers, Steve Web : sanesecurity.com Blog: sanesecurity.blogspot.com Twitter: @sanesecurity

Re: [clamav-users] (no subject)

Is the file currently being written to by another process? dp On 9/3/16 2:07 AM, Gérard Lemarié wrote: Hello, When I run a clamscan on my computer, clamav returns to me an lot of similar error messages : LibClamaV Warning: fmap_readpage : preadfail : asked for 4085 bytes@offset11, got 0

Re: [clamav-users] (no subject)

Respected Sir/Madam, Could you tell me step-wise how to install stable version 0.98.5 from source code in ubuntu??? --- Naresh On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 1:47 AM, jpff j...@codemist.co.uk wrote: Thank you Shawn; that fixes it. I did look at the archive but clearly inadequately

Re: [clamav-users] (no subject)

Thank you Shawn; that fixes it. I did look at the archive but clearly inadequately All working at company and university ==John ffitch ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq

Re: [clamav-users] (no subject)

On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 9:04 AM, jpff j...@codemist.co.uk wrote: Since building 0.98.5 I am seeing ERROR: This tool requires libclamav with functionality level 79 or higher (current f-level: 77) when updating rules. I assume I have some mis-configuration but what? ==John ff Hey John,

Re: [clamav-users] (no subject)

I sent a note out on this yesterday with reference to most Mac OS X users who have /usr/php/install-pear-nozlib.phar on their hard drives, having already submitted the file as an FP. Since then there have been a couple of other Unix users report similar results and a promise to get back to us,

Re: [clamav-users] (no subject)

Found your message. Thanks Al! (and sorry for my forgotten subject ... :-( ) Steffen I sent a note out on this yesterday with reference to most Mac OS X users who have /usr/php/install-pear-nozlib.phar on their hard drives, having already submitted the file as an FP. Since then there have

Re: [clamav-users] (no subject)

The signature has been updated this morning to: PHP.Exploit.CVE_2011_4153-2:0:*:3c3f{-512}646566696e6528{-20}7374725f72657065617428{-20}2461726776 Please update your signatures to Daily CVD 15471 or later. Thanks, - Alain ___ Help us build a

Re: [clamav-users] (no subject)

Please run freshclam, an update has been pushed. Joel On May 11, 2012, at 11:40 AM, Andrew Thompson wrote: Hello We were seeing a number of files being quarantined earlier with the reference BC.Exploit.CVE_2012_1847 FOUND and BC.Exploit.CVE_2012_0184 FOUND. The CVE numbers point to

Re: [clamav-users] (no subject)

On 03/03/2012 04:44 PM, Jayson Brush wrote: Hello I currently have ClamSMTP and ClamAV 0.97.3 installed on CentOS with postfix and dovecot. The setup works and ClamAV properly scans all emails and detects viruses. However, I have enabled the DLP module in Clamd to detect CC numbers and SSNs

Re: [clamav-users] (no subject)

Correct. I lowered the StructuredMinCreditCardCount from 3 to 1 and sent five CC#s at a time with no detection. It does detect SSNs fine. Thanks, any other suggestions? 2012/3/3 Török Edwin edwin+ml-cla...@etorok.net On 03/03/2012 04:44 PM, Jayson Brush wrote: Hello I currently have

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

I had this issue last night. It was fixed between the time I first reported the problem and the time I successfully uploaded the file. I just updated the database one more time and no more false positives. Sent from Janet's iPad -Al- -- Al Varnell On Nov 8, 2010, at 1:21 PM, Eric Black

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

Until a few months ago I had 2(!!!) Redhat 7 servers in full flight running compiled versions of sendmail and clamav (amongst other things). I never had any problems to get the latest versions compiled Jobst On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 01:22:53PM +0300, Török Edwin (edwinto...@gmail.com)

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

On 4/21/10 05:38 , Jim Preston wrote: Steve Wray wrote: I am not a lawyer but I do think that this is something that the authorities might possibly examine. I do think that pushing out an update which disables functionality without explicitly requesting permission to make such a change

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 20:34 -0700, Jim Preston wrote: Well, prosecution would be justified if ClamAV had actually done something illegal. They did. Releasing 'code' that they new had a potential to harm or interfere with the operation of systems. It's a clearly defined CRIMINAL offence in my

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

From: clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net [mailto:clamav-users- boun...@lists.clamav.net] On Behalf Of Jim Preston Steve Wray wrote: Spiro Harvey wrote: Shame you haven't talked to to others - like havp for example - before doing this. The announcement to EOL the old releases was

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

In message 4bce64a1.8040...@cwa.co.nz Steve Wray steve.w...@cwa.co.nz was claimed to have wrote: The thing is that there are a few little issues here that, as points of law are not clear yet. In what follows words like 'vendor' may not be used entirely legally precisely, IANAL, but I am certain

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

-Original Message- From: clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net [mailto:clamav-users- boun...@lists.clamav.net] On Behalf Of lists Sent: woensdag 21 april 2010 8:10 To: ClamAV users ML Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject) On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 20:34 -0700, Jim Preston wrote

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 08:27 +0200, Maurice Lucas - TAOS-IT wrote: -Original Message- From: clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net [mailto:clamav-users- boun...@lists.clamav.net] On Behalf Of lists Sent: woensdag 21 april 2010 8:10 To: ClamAV users ML Subject: Re: [Clamav-users

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

Steve Wray wrote: I know that in certain jurisdictions, reaching out to someone elses computer (ie not your property) and disabling functionality on it could constitute a criminal act. I am also of the opinion that it was illegal under UK law. I sincerely hope that someone somewhere under

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

In message 1271831753.5073.28.ca...@localhost, lists writes: For instance, if I go to a shop and they give me a radio free. I take that radio home and use it. If that shop then calls me up and says 'If you don't change that radio, I'm going to break it' it is a case of blackmail. A better analogy

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 08:20:08 +0200 Maurice Lucas - TAOS-IT mslu...@taos-it.nl wrote: If your lock of the front door is very easy to break open do you want to change locks? Sorry to jump in. There is a pretty famous film made by Michael Moore where he tested exactly this topic (closed doors)

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

Christer Boräng wrote: In message 1271831753.5073.28.ca...@localhost, lists writes: For instance, if I go to a shop and they give me a radio free. I take that radio home and use it. If that shop then calls me up and says 'If you don't change that radio, I'm going to break it' it is a case of

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 08:15:35 +0100 Simon Hobson li...@thehobsons.co.uk articulated: [snip] I had thought by now that this thread would have died a natural death. Obviously, I was mistaken. It has continued to pollute this forum for nearly a week. What has become conspicuously apparent is that

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

Jerry wrote: What has become conspicuously apparent is that if those who are doing the most complaining had spend even one percent of that time keeping their systems up-to-date and keeping themselves abreast of current development and deployment strategies with the software they employ, this

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

In the interest of eliminating any further waste of my time or computer resources, I am now instigating a kill filter on this thread. +1 +1 ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

+1 +0x1 but if you *really* must... http://www.acepolls.com/polls/1116421-clamav-eol-what-do-you-think Steve Sanesecurity ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

lists wrote: Please show us some evidence that clamav made you install there free product on your server. Why didn't you install some other product? Is it your server? Then you have the power to install every product you want onto the machine but YOU choose Clamav and they didn't

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

Jerry wrote: I had thought by now that this thread would have died a natural death. Obviously, I was mistaken. It has continued to pollute this forum for nearly a week. What has become conspicuously apparent is that if those who are doing the most complaining had spend even one percent of that

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

Quoting lists li...@retrochoons.co.uk: Doesn't change a thing. If you threaten me with a course of action, if I fail to do something that is blackmail. It's nothing else. It does not matter if the product is free. This is not the definition of blackmail, in common usage or in law in most

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

Quoting Simon Hobson li...@thehobsons.co.uk: Put bluntly, if people had admitted early on that perhaps it could have been handled better, that perhaps they didn't consider all classes/types of user, and that it is perhaps not unreasonable that users could be a trifle annoyed ... then this

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

Eric Rostetter wrote: Put bluntly, if people had admitted early on that perhaps it could have been handled better, that perhaps they didn't consider all classes/types of user, and that it is perhaps not unreasonable that users could be a trifle annoyed ... then this **WOULD** have blown over

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 14:36:17 +1200 Steve Wray steve.w...@cwa.co.nz wrote: I know that in certain jurisdictions, reaching out to someone elses computer (ie not your property) and disabling functionality on it could constitute a criminal act. I sincerely hope that someone somewhere under such

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

Spiro Harvey wrote: On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 14:36:17 +1200 Steve Wray steve.w...@cwa.co.nz wrote: I know that in certain jurisdictions, reaching out to someone elses computer (ie not your property) and disabling functionality on it could constitute a criminal act. I sincerely hope that someone

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 08:19:31 +1200 Steve Wray steve.w...@cwa.co.nz wrote: Don't get distracted by issues such as Oh those bad silly sysadmins out there who messed up, its really *their* fault not the fault of the Clamav developers! That is just *not* helpful. The damage is already done;

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, Steve Wray wrote: This is part of the attitude problem from many open source projects. They are (too often) run by technicians and programmers with no input from the business side. IMHO, open source projects don't have a business side. Opensource projects exist for the

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

Spiro Harvey wrote: On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 08:19:31 +1200 Steve Wray steve.w...@cwa.co.nz wrote: Don't get distracted by issues such as Oh those bad silly sysadmins out there who messed up, its really *their* fault not the fault of the Clamav developers! That is just *not* helpful. The damage is

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:39 PM, Christopher X. Candreva ch...@westnet.com wrote: IMHO, open source projects don't have a business side. Opensource projects exist for the developers to get the software they need, faster, through colaboration with others. If anyone else finds it usefull

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

Peter Bonivart wrote: On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:39 PM, Christopher X. Candreva ch...@westnet.com wrote: IMHO, open source projects don't have a business side. Opensource projects exist for the developers to get the software they need, faster, through colaboration with others. If anyone else

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

On Apr 21, 2010, at 12:15 AM, Simon Hobson wrote: Steve Wray wrote: I know that in certain jurisdictions, reaching out to someone elses computer (ie not your property) and disabling functionality on it could constitute a criminal act. I am also of the opinion that it was illegal under UK

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

I can't believe I've been suckered into this nonsense This is part of the attitude problem from many open source projects. They are (too often) run by technicians and programmers with no input from the business side. OH, lets not forget certain users What the Clamav team did, I can't

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 08:51:00 +1200 Steve Wray steve.w...@cwa.co.nz wrote: This would be ok if the distros maintained the servers which their distributed version of Clamav updated from. They don't. The responsibility in this case is that of those who maintain Clamav, not the distros. I would

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

Spiro Harvey wrote: On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 08:51:00 +1200 Steve Wray steve.w...@cwa.co.nz wrote: This would be ok if the distros maintained the servers which their distributed version of Clamav updated from. They don't. The responsibility in this case is that of those who maintain Clamav, not

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

On Apr 21, 2010, at 8:45 AM, Simon Hobson wrote: Jerry wrote: I had thought by now that this thread would have died a natural death. Obviously, I was mistaken. It has continued to pollute this forum for nearly a week. What has become conspicuously apparent is that if those who are doing

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

On Apr 21, 2010, at 1:19 PM, Steve Wray wrote: Spiro Harvey wrote: On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 14:36:17 +1200 Steve Wray steve.w...@cwa.co.nz wrote: I know that in certain jurisdictions, reaching out to someone elses computer (ie not your property) and disabling functionality on it could

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

On Apr 21, 2010, at 1:51 PM, Steve Wray wrote: Peter Bonivart wrote: On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:39 PM, Christopher X. Candreva ch...@westnet.com wrote: IMHO, open source projects don't have a business side. Opensource projects exist for the developers to get the software they need, faster,

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

On Apr 21, 2010, at 2:09 PM, Steve Wray wrote: Spiro Harvey wrote: On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 08:51:00 +1200 Steve Wray steve.w...@cwa.co.nz wrote: This would be ok if the distros maintained the servers which their distributed version of Clamav updated from. They don't. The responsibility in this

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 17:00 -0700, Jim Preston wrote: On Apr 21, 2010, at 2:51 PM, Steve Holdoway wrote: On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 09:07 +1200, Spiro Harvey wrote: But the distro are the ones who gave you outdated unsupported software. Had they provided you with a newer package, you

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 12:15 AM, Simon Hobson li...@thehobsons.co.uk wrote: Jason Haar wrote: ClamAV devs: your response was appropriate. I speak on behalf of the 99% of sites unaffected by this. You can tell that as only 10 people seem to be involved in this thread. Only 10 people who

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

On Apr 21, 2010, at 6:02 PM, Chris Knight wrote: On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 12:15 AM, Simon Hobson li...@thehobsons.co.uk wrote: Jason Haar wrote: ClamAV devs: your response was appropriate. I speak on behalf of the 99% of sites unaffected by this. You can tell that as only 10 people

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

On Apr 21, 2010, at 5:08 PM, Steve Holdoway wrote: On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 17:00 -0700, Jim Preston wrote: On Apr 21, 2010, at 2:51 PM, Steve Holdoway wrote: On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 09:07 +1200, Spiro Harvey wrote: But the distro are the ones who gave you outdated unsupported software. Had

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

Quoting Steve Holdoway st...@greengecko.co.nz: Spiro, you're missing the point of a distro completely. That is to provide a functionally static platform for people to use and release to. From that point on, only security patches are released. The fact that 0.94.x was current when debian lenny

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

Quoting Jim Preston jimli...@commspeed.net: Read what I said. *functional* not security. Like, for example, php is at 5.2.6 on lenny, unless you configure is differently. That's the whole point of releases. There are distros that release functional (feature) upgrades as well as security/bug

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

On 4/21/10 10:06 PM, Eric Rostetter wrote: Quoting Jim Preston jimli...@commspeed.net: Read what I said. *functional* not security. Like, for example, php is at 5.2.6 on lenny, unless you configure is differently. That's the whole point of releases. There are distros that release functional

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

Dennis Peterson wrote: The question wasn't directed to my but I'd like to see them be more selective as to who should be allowed to use this product. Maybe an IQ test. Really that is an insulting statement - and completely un called for. It's exactly the sort of attitude that drives people

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 17:28 -0700, Dennis Peterson wrote: [...] The question wasn't directed to my but I'd like to see them be more selective as to who should be allowed to use this product. Maybe an IQ test. No. Everyone should be allowed to shoot in the foot - with free/open source or

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

Spiro Harvey wrote: Shame you haven't talked to to others - like havp for example - before doing this. The announcement to EOL the old releases was made at the start of october last year. If people using clam as an integral part of their software don't read announcements, what fault is that of

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

On 04/21/2010 02:36 PM, Steve Wray wrote: Because Clamav is now in the same category as Apple, Amazon and Sony (to name three that come to mind right away). This is the category of vendors who have remotely disabled (or removed) software running on computers or devices belonging to their

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

Steve Wray wrote: Spiro Harvey wrote: Shame you haven't talked to to others - like havp for example - before doing this. The announcement to EOL the old releases was made at the start of october last year. If people using clam as an integral part of their software don't read announcements,

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

Jim Preston wrote: Steve Wray wrote: Spiro Harvey wrote: Shame you haven't talked to to others - like havp for example - before doing this. The announcement to EOL the old releases was made at the start of october last year. If people using clam as an integral part of their software don't

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

Well, prosecution would be justified if ClamAV had actually done something illegal. What they did was modifiy their signature database to support new features with advance notice and the fact that any particular installation of unsupported software failed to handle it properly is the onus of

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

Steve Wray wrote: I am not a lawyer but I do think that this is something that the authorities might possibly examine. I do think that pushing out an update which disables functionality without explicitly requesting permission to make such a change *before* making that change *should* be

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

2) If it aint broke - don't fix it. There's no way I'd attempt a major upgrade in-place when it's a live server used 24*7. For various internal reasons (which I'm sure you can guess) I don't have the resources to do anything but an in-place upgrade if I want to upgrade. Well if they don't

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

Yes, and most likely the case and most likely the managers screaming that it should not have failed because they did not authorize the server to fail. And yes this a weak attempt at humor on my part and not in need of retort. Not so weak - but it sounds like you've met some of my past

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

On 4/19/10 9:22 AM, Jim Preston wrote: But on a more serious note, what method would you like to have had them take to make you aware of the impending failure? The question wasn't directed to my but I'd like to see them be more selective as to who should be allowed to use this product.

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

Shame you haven't talked to to others - like havp for example - before doing this. The announcement to EOL the old releases was made at the start of october last year. If people using clam as an integral part of their software don't read announcements, what fault is that of the clam developers?

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

1) If it aint broke, don't fix it. It works, has worked reliably for several years, and was working fine yesterday. It's uptime is And now it's broken. So you have to fix it. Life on the edge is scary for some sysadmins, eh? currently 405 days, and then the last downtime was to physically

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

On 4/18/10 1:27 PM, Spiro Harvey wrote: Shame you haven't talked to to others - like havp for example - before doing this. The announcement to EOL the old releases was made at the start of october last year. If people using clam as an integral part of their software don't read announcements,

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

Sh They've simmered down, I don't need the issue stirred up again Spiro Harvey wrote: Shame you haven't talked to to others - like havp for example - before doing this. The announcement to EOL the old releases was made at the start of october last year. If people using clam as an

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

On Apr 18, 2010, at 1:40 PM, Ken Campney wrote: Sh They've simmered down, I don't need the issue stirred up again Spiro Harvey wrote: Shame you haven't talked to to others - like havp for example - before doing this. The announcement to EOL the old releases was made at the start of

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

yup, that's me, though in all honesty the comment was supposed to read They've simmered down, I don't think the issue needs stirring up again Proof reading is a wonderful thing when not practiced in moderation :\ And you run the risk of being called the most arrogant and ignorant person on

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

On Apr 18, 2010, at 2:39 PM, Ken Campney wrote: yup, that's me, though in all honesty the comment was supposed to read They've simmered down, I don't think the issue needs stirring up again Proof reading is a wonderful thing when not practiced in moderation :\ And you run the risk of

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

On 04/16/2010 10:21 AM, Dima wrote: Hello Today, after the next regular virus database update antivirus stopped working. The following quote log database update and response program. Fri Apr 16 10:12:14 2010 - clamd daemon 0.92.1 (OS: linux-gnu, ARCH: i386, CPU: i386)

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 10:37 +0300, Török Edwin wrote: On 04/16/2010 10:21 AM, Dima wrote: Hello Today, after the next regular virus database update antivirus stopped working. The following quote log database update and response program. Fri Apr 16 10:12:14 2010 - clamd daemon

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 11:58:29 +0300 Dima clamu...@visaginas.net wrote: Hit http://archive.debian.org sarge/volatile/non-free Packages Hit http://archive.debian.org sarge/volatile/non-free Release Reading Package Lists... Done server:/# LANG=C apt-get install clamav clamav-base clamav-daemon

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 12:28:44 +0300 Dima clamu...@visaginas.net wrote: There is a small problem - until this morning me and tens of thousands of other users of this operating system is fully suited for more than 5 years. Update your operating system is now quick and painless can not perform

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 11:58:29 +0300, Dima clamu...@visaginas.net wrote: Upgrade it. If you use Debian add the volatile repository. Hit http://archive.debian.org sarge/main Packages Hit http://archive.debian.org sarge/main Release Hit http://archive.debian.org sarge/contrib Packages Hit

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

On 04/16/2010 01:07 PM, Dima wrote: I have something very much doubt that this can be done on the old compiler using libraries of those times. People have successfully built ClamAV on various old systems, maybe not with all the features, but it surely built and run. Just give it a try.

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

Richard Bishop wrote: You are running Debian Sarge! That's been EOL and unsupported for over 2 years (March 2008). See here - http://www.debian.org/releases/sarge/ Yes, I am as well - and for several good reasons. 1) If it aint broke, don't fix it. It works, has worked reliably for

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

Em 16/04/2010 07:22, Török Edwin escreveu: On 04/16/2010 01:07 PM, Dima wrote: I have something very much doubt that this can be done on the old compiler using libraries of those times. People have successfully built ClamAV on various old systems, maybe not with all the features, but it

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

Leonardo Rodrigues wrote: Em 16/04/2010 07:22, Török Edwin escreveu: On 04/16/2010 01:07 PM, Dima wrote: I have something very much doubt that this can be done on the old compiler using libraries of those times. People have successfully built ClamAV on various old systems, maybe not with

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 9:18 PM, alex liveti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi there? is not a viros is just a pape work just to take look at correcy and send it bac to please just test can i send t. You may want to read the reply to your post yesterday. -- Rob MacGregor Whoever fights monsters

Re: [Clamav-users] (no subject)

If you want to see whether a sample you have is considered malware, upload it to VirusTotal or Jotti. www.*virus**total*.com virusscan.*jotti*.org/ On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 3:58 PM, alex liveti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: HI there? please can I send you a test that I alreday filed to see where

  1   2   >