On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 12:15 AM, Simon Hobson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Jason Haar wrote: > >> ClamAV devs: your response was appropriate. I speak on behalf of the 99% >> of sites unaffected by this. You can tell that as only 10 people seem to >> be involved in this thread. > > Only 10 people who thought it worth while to put their hands up and say > something about it. There will be many who will have seen the threads and > decided they have nothing more to add than "me too", and probably a fair > number that are waiting for their friendly tech to unbreak their appliance. I've been watching this thread, and several others, for a few days now. I haven't said anything because I did not think I had anything worth contributing to the discussion. It seems plain to me that nothing is going to be solved here. I am speaking up now because I do not want my silent observance to be seen as 'approval' of what happened. I vehemently disagree with the way the ClamAV developers handled this situation. I sincerely hope that the FOSS community rises up to the challenge and an equally capable virus scanner is born whose core developers are a little more considerate in how they treat the many 'upgrade orphans' that will always exist. -Chris _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
