Hi,
I'm running clamav .7.5.1 and want to update to latest verion. I was able
to compile clamav-0.80rc3 without any problem but somehow I remained
unsuccessful after clamav-0.80rc3. Below was the error received when
attempted
to compile clamav-0.80rc4 and clamav-080:
# make
...
make
Ajaya Sharma wrote:
Hi,
I'm running clamav .7.5.1 and want to update to latest verion. I was able
to compile clamav-0.80rc3 without any problem but somehow I remained
unsuccessful after clamav-0.80rc3. Below was the error received when
attempted
to compile clamav-0.80rc4 and clamav-080:
# make
...
Yes I'm running Solaris 2.6 and I tried with both gcc 3.3.2 and 3.4.2
with no success. I'm just wondering, why I'm not having problem compiling
Clamav-0.8.0rc3 but with the same environment I'm getting errors for
Clamav-0.8.0 and 0.8.0rc4?
Is there any workaround for this?
Regards,
Ajaya Sharma
Thomas Lamy wrote:
Ajaya Sharma wrote:
Hi,
I'm running clamav .7.5.1 and want to update to latest verion. I was
able
to compile clamav-0.80rc3 without any problem but somehow I remained
unsuccessful after clamav-0.80rc3. Below was the error received when
attempted
to compile clamav-0.80rc4 and
On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 00:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Joe Maimon wrote:
The ClamAV authors could put a stop to this by making clamdscan and
clamscan the same program and then acting differently depending on
which name is run. This is similiar to how gzip and
I am running clamscan in quiet mode, but since the upgrade to 0.80, I
have a lots of warnings. Here are some samples :
LibClamAV Warning: Unknown encoding type US-ASCII - report to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
LibClamAV Warning: messageFindArgument: no '=' sign found in MIME header
LibClamAV Warning:
On Thursday 28 Oct 2004 07:25, Ajaya Sharma wrote:
Undefined first referenced
symbol in file
__eprintf strrcpy.lo
I don't have a machine that reproduces this error, so I can't say for
sure, however I believe that
Hello Listers,
I'm having problems installing the ClamAV with amavis. I'm using the old
amavis(20020531), not the amavis-new or -new generation. My mailserver is
running perfectly so I was not planning on making an update, till our ISP
closes our line because we were sending virussus. (This was
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 10:58:27 +0200, Roel Bindels
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hope that somebody can help using/installing ClamAV. I googled around and
they are all talking about the other versions, so I hope you're not all
going to give me the advice install the new version.
Well, unless you
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004, Trog wrote:
Any thoughts on how this should be accomplished?
I may have missed it, but what are the details of your system, OS, etc.
And, importantly, what exact version of libz (zlib) do you have
installed?
Not really applicable, I'm not having stability issues.
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 at 19:14:04 +0200, Jacek Politowski wrote:
We have one client, who was trying to send some MS Word (doc) file
from Outlook Express.
Message was rejected by Exiscan with ClamAV 0.80:
Wed Oct 27 10:56:19 2004 -
/var/spool/exim/scan/1CMjao-0004ts-Qg/1CMjao-0004ts-Qg.eml:
On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 12:32, Tomasz Papszun wrote:
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 at 19:14:04 +0200, Jacek Politowski wrote:
We have one client, who was trying to send some MS Word (doc) file
from Outlook Express.
Message was rejected by Exiscan with ClamAV 0.80:
Wed Oct 27 10:56:19 2004 -
clamav-0.80 (from port) on FreeBSD 4.8
Hi,
Does anyone know how to switch off the default-enabled options in
clamd.conf?
# Perform HTML normalisation and decryption of MS Script Encoder code.
# Default: enabled
#ScanHTML
This should switch of HTML scanning, but from my clamd.log ...
Thu Oct
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 at 12:40:09 +0100, Roger North-Row wrote:
clamav-0.80 (from port) on FreeBSD 4.8
Hi,
Does anyone know how to switch off the default-enabled options in
clamd.conf?
# Perform HTML normalisation and decryption of MS Script Encoder code.
# Default: enabled
#ScanHTML
Thank you. I /did/ read the clamd.conf man page, but I've not come
across this type of 'overall' switch in a config file and so wasn't
expecting it. I apologise for not looking hard enough.
On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 12:51, Tomasz Papszun wrote:
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 at 12:40:09 +0100, Roger North-Row
Don't apologize, that is why these lists exist - right?
Roger North-Row wrote:
Thank you. I /did/ read the clamd.conf man page, but I've not come
across this type of 'overall' switch in a config file and so wasn't
expecting it. I apologise for not looking hard enough.
On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 12:51,
On Wednesday 27 October 2004 08:00 pm, mike.sanchez wrote:
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Joe Maimon wrote:
The ClamAV authors could put a stop to this by making clamdscan and
clamscan the same program and then acting differently depending on
which name is run. This is similiar to how gzip and
Thank you, team ClamAV, for your your hard work on the latest release.
ClamAV 0.80 (FreeBSD 4.9) is by far the most stable and memory efficient
clamd yet.
*applause*
Regards,
Mike Lambert
___
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 10:33:32 -0400 (EDT)
Mike Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you, team ClamAV, for your your hard work on the latest release.
ClamAV 0.80 (FreeBSD 4.9) is by far the most stable and memory
efficient clamd yet.
*applause*
Thank you! :-)
--
oo.
Mike Lambert wrote:
Thank you, team ClamAV, for your your hard work on the latest release.
ClamAV 0.80 (FreeBSD 4.9) is by far the most stable and memory
efficient clamd yet.
*applause*
Regards,
Mike Lambert
___
I concur!! I did have problem with
-Original Message-
From: Vernon A. Fort [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] thank you
I concur!! I did have problem with keeping freshclam and
clamd running
on previous version but with the release of .80, all process have
continue to run flawlessly on 60+
On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 12:36:06PM +0100, Trog wrote:
On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 12:32, Tomasz Papszun wrote:
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 at 19:14:04 +0200, Jacek Politowski wrote:
We have one client, who was trying to send some MS Word (doc) file
from Outlook Express.
[...]
Unfortunately I can't get this
On Thursday 28 October 2004 16:33, Mike Lambert shaped the electrons to say:
Thank you, team ClamAV, for your your hard work on the latest release.
ClamAV 0.80 (FreeBSD 4.9) is by far the most stable and memory efficient
clamd yet.
*applause*
I will second that... if any of you are ever in
On Thursday 28 October 2004 10:55 am, Scott Ryan wrote:
I will second that... if any of you are ever in South Africa, beers are on
me.
No need my friend.. Its a new world these days..
http://www.sendafriendabeer.com/
;)
Jeff
pgp0WdsS5yxUx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Odhiambo Washington wanted us to know:
Hey Todd,
How does one determine the correct number of threads to use in
clamd.conf?
Answering this question conclusively will help many folks.
I really don't have an answer for this one. I ran it at 20 for a long
time and just recently moved it up to 40
mike.sanchez wanted us to know:
An action could then be taken to
alert someone if clamd died (|sendmail [EMAIL PROTECTED]). When clamd
hangs on our system, mail is deferred until I realize mail has stopped and
as you can imagine, that is a bad thing.
I run a cron once an hour that runs
On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 10:17:22AM -0500, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
as you can imagine, that's orders of magnitude more complicated than running
the two under daemontools or runit (both do essentially the same thing)
http://cr.yp.to/daemontools.html
http://smarden.org/runit/
They don't help
I decided to test cygwin clamscan and it hung after a few hundred files
Going to see if winclam has the same difficulties
--
David L Nicol
transportation infrastructure technology contracting since 2002
___
it was scanning a 1 gigabyte file system image, which took several
minutes.
I would not have gotten worried about it if the file name appeared on
its own before the OK -- possibly with some size information -- in the
output.
--
David L Nicol
transportation infrastructure technology contracting
I have several mail relays on Sun Sparcs with Solaris 8 and 9
running exim, exiscan, and clamav. All the same version.
top shows clamd uses 5%-40% CPU time (it was always
among top 10 highest CPU users). I figured
hey, since this is a busy server then this load is normal.
A rather interesting fact
Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
I have several mail relays on Sun Sparcs with Solaris 8 and 9
running exim, exiscan, and clamav. All the same version.
top shows clamd uses 5%-40% CPU time (it was always
among top 10 highest CPU users).
I use clamd on a Solaris 9 sparc system and it hardly ever climbs
On Thursday 28 October 2004 09:10 pm, David Nicol wrote:
it was scanning a 1 gigabyte file system image, which took several
minutes.
I would not have gotten worried about it if the file name appeared on
its own before the OK -- possibly with some size information -- in the
output.
ok, so a
James Lick wrote:
Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
I have several mail relays on Sun Sparcs with Solaris 8 and 9
running exim, exiscan, and clamav. All the same version.
top shows clamd uses 5%-40% CPU time (it was always
among top 10 highest CPU users).
I use clamd on a Solaris 9 sparc system and it
33 matches
Mail list logo
