Hi all,
i tried to build clamav source code with ndk tools for android platform
and x86 cpu architecture
please find below my build script info
*#!/bin/bash*
*export NDK=/home/crazythinker-admin/Android/Sdk/ndk-bundle*
*$NDK/build/tools/make-standalone-toolchain.sh --platform=android-9
--to
On Wed, 21 Dec 2016, Mark Foley wrote:
>On Wed, 21 Dec 2016 17:34:05 Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> Am 21.12.2016 um 17:25 schrieb Mark Foley:
>> > I'm running clamdscan on Maildir folders as:
>> >
>> > clamdscan --config-file=/usr/local/etc/clamdscan.conf --multiscan \
>> > --fdpass --allmatch --st
On Wed, 21 Dec 2016 17:34:05 Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 21.12.2016 um 17:25 schrieb Mark Foley:
> > I'm running clamdscan on Maildir folders as:
> >
> > clamdscan --config-file=/usr/local/etc/clamdscan.conf --multiscan \
> > --fdpass --allmatch --stdout /home/HPRS/user/Maildir/
> >
> > I want to
Steve,
> Time: 86.344 sec (1 m 26 s)
That's why we should use clamdscan instead of clamscan. Clamscan reload all
databases each time, this takes too much time.
Btw, what was the CPU for this test ?
--
Best regards,
Arnaud Jacques
SecuriteInfo.com
Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/pages/Se
Am 21.12.2016 um 17:25 schrieb Mark Foley:
I'm running clamdscan on Maildir folders as:
clamdscan --config-file=/usr/local/etc/clamdscan.conf --multiscan \
--fdpass --allmatch --stdout /home/HPRS/user/Maildir/
I want to skip checking for OLE2 macros. The /usr/local/etc/clamdscan.conf has:
I'm running clamdscan on Maildir folders as:
clamdscan --config-file=/usr/local/etc/clamdscan.conf --multiscan \
--fdpass --allmatch --stdout /home/HPRS/user/Maildir/
I want to skip checking for OLE2 macros. The /usr/local/etc/clamdscan.conf has:
ScanOLE2 no
OLE2BlockMacros no
However, it sti
> So all signatures should be running fine with 6Gb of RAM, right ?
> Even our big signatures :)
Summary test:
Using clamscan only to scan test.eml (3,706 bytes)
ClamAV Official sigs only (daily/main):
pool memory used: 385.675 MB
Official + *all* Sanesecurity/Distributed sigs
pool memory used
Thank you for your report Steve.
> Official:
Missing main.cvd :/
> Hope that helps see where some of the memory may be going,
> sorry for not sorting... I'm under orders to go shopping ;)
So all signatures should be running fine with 6Gb of RAM, right ?
Even our big signatures :)
--
Best rega
Selçuk,
> in redhat El 6 version thereis no clamdscan command .
It is in the "clamd" package.
http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/34508318/dir/redhat_el_6/com/clamd-0.99.2-1.el6.x86_64.rpm.html
--
Best regards,
Arnaud Jacques
SecuriteInfo.com
Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/pages
Am 21.12.2016 um 14:38 schrieb Selcuk Yazar:
Dear Arnaud
in redhat El 6 version thereis no clamdscan command
this is simply not true - clamav is from the EPEL repo and here you go
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=772565
the package "clamd" contains /usr/bin/clamdscan u
As some people have reported memory issues...
Quickly put these together based on scanning a small file
and *only* loading *one* signature database at a time:
Sanesecurity:
badmacro.ndb,pool memory used: 5.132 MB
blurl.ndb,pool memory used: 4.800 MB
bofhland_cracked_URL.ndb,pool memory used: 4.3
Dear Arnaud
in redhat El 6 version thereis no clamdscan command . when a new mail
arrived at postfix server, it calls amavisd and spamassasin then clamscan
running for emails.
can it (slow scan) be depend to internet connection ??
normally we are managing 60K users with clam with no problem but
Hello Selçuk,
> when i try to run clamscan for single file on tmp folder it takes 12
> minutes !!!
Please use clamdscan.
How many time it takes to scan the same file ?
--
Best regards,
Arnaud Jacques
SecuriteInfo.com
Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/pages/SecuriteInfocom/132872523492286
Tw
Hi,
we have redhat EL 6 server (92GB RAM , 8Core CPU )with postfix and we use
clamav for viruses etc.
when i try to run clamscan for single file on tmp folder it takes 12
minutes !!!
after i move main.cvd (105MB) trash
it takes 4 seconds.
what it can be ?
thanks in advance
Selçuk YAZAR
__
Hello,
> Javascript.ndb from Securiteinfo was causing major memory and scanning
> issues for some people.
Free version of javascript.ndb has 39861 lines
Pro version of javascript.ndb has 45511 lines.
This should be OK for 6Gb of RAM. Even 4Gb I think.
AFAIK, the problem occurs when javascript.n
On 21 December 2016 11:07:42 Al Varnell wrote:
Are you using any UNOFFICIAL signatures? Some of them have been causing
memory issues recently for others.
Al, while some 3rd party sigs are using memory, you also got to remember the
Huge amount of sig only hashes the official sigs are addi
Do you have a list of signatures in your clamav database folder you can list?
Cheers,
Steve
Twitter: @sanesecurity
On 21 December 2016 11:20:12 "Richard Walker - Seven Internet Ltd"
wrote:
Hi Al
Yes I'm using unofficial signatures. I have disabled the cron for updates.
How do I safety r
Hi Al
Yes I'm using unofficial signatures. I have disabled the cron for updates.
How do I safety remove the UNOFFICIAL signatures?
Thanks
Rich
-Original Message-
From: clamav-users [mailto:clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net] On Behalf
Of Al Varnell
Sent: 21 December 2016 11:07
To: Cl
Are you using any UNOFFICIAL signatures? Some of them have been causing memory
issues recently for others.
-Al-
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 02:09 AM, Richard Walker - Seven Internet Ltd wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I am having to restart clamd twice a day now. I can't find anything in the
> mail/clamd logs o
Hi
I am having to restart clamd twice a day now. I can't find anything in the
mail/clamd logs other than hundreds of entries like this
1cIzSP-8u-84 malware acl condition: clamd /var/run/clamav/clamd.sock :
unable to connect to UNIX socket (/var/run/clamav/clamd.sock): Connection
refused
On s
20 matches
Mail list logo
