Hi ,
I uncomment the line TCPSocket 3310 on /usr/local/etc/clamav.conf but
when I run the command:
/usr/local/sbin/clamav-milter -blo /var/run/clmilter.sock
it says:
connect: Connection refused
Can't talk to clamd server at 127.0.0.1 on port 3310
Check your entry for TCPSocket in
On Monday 12 Jan 2004 5:36 am, STEPHEN_DAVID SCANLAN wrote:
I can't get clamav-milter to create a socket correctly.
I am particularly puzzled with the clamd errors. How can I tell if the
Daemon is running?
I don't see it with ps -aux
Of the two problems you mention I suspect the second is
On Monday 12 Jan 2004 7:19 am, Alikhani wrote:
Hi ,
I uncomment the line TCPSocket 3310 on /usr/local/etc/clamav.conf but
when I run the command:
/usr/local/sbin/clamav-milter -blo /var/run/clmilter.sock
it says:
connect: Connection refused
Can't talk to clamd server at 127.0.0.1 on port
Hi All,
Below is the output of freshclam while updating virus db. I am running
clamav on sparc solaris 8 machine. freshclam was doing fine for
previous version of clamav (0.60) the problem comes after updating to
version 0.65
---
Hi Nigel
Thank you very much for your help. I run clamd at first and the when I
run clamav-milter it was OK.
-- by regards
-- Sophia
Nigel Horne wrote:
On Monday 12 Jan 2004 7:19 am, Alikhani wrote:
Hi ,
I uncomment the line TCPSocket 3310 on /usr/local/etc/clamav.conf but
when I run the
Just worked here after failing earlier in the day.
Regards
Mick Pollard ( lunix )
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 23:44:29 -0500 (EST)
Christopher X. Candreva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Payal Rathod wrote:
I updated my definitions just 1 mins back. They seem ok.
-Payal
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 at 16:45:30 -0500, jef moskot wrote:
Out of curiosity, what sort of viruses are typically being added to the
database? Are they mostly new viruses?
Added are viruses which users submitted to us :-) . Or found by us.
Of course we add new viruses as quickly as possible
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Mick Pollard wrote:
Just worked here after failing earlier in the day.
Checking the logs, updates started working at 4:50 AM this moring (Monday)
==
Chris Candreva -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- (914) 967-7816
WestNet
On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 04:53:45PM -0800, OpenMacNews wrote :
hi,
my db updates have *suddenly* stopped working after no prior problems
for ages.
now, a:
% /usr/local/clamav/bin/freshclam --log=/var/log/freshclam.log
--datadir=/var/clamav_db
reports:
I have a problem with clamscan. When I scan the test files it reports the correct
number of infected files but when I scan a copy of the EICAR Standard Antivirus Test
File, clamscan ignores it. Whats up?
Bob Simpson
---
This SF.net email
On Monday 12 Jan 2004 3:31 pm, EyedMax wrote:
Hello, list!
p.s. sendmail compiled with milter - actually I run a drweb mail filter
via it...
Running a milter from within sendmail (i.e. having a sendmail which supports
mailters at runtime) is not the same as being able to build new milters.
Hi all,
I have got some false positives but the files are too big for the form
at http://www.nervous.it/~nervous/cgi-bin/sendvirus.cgi
The false positives are occuring with boot disk images and iso files.
The implicated signatures are :
- HLLC.GodSquad
- Constructor.Dos.DBCK
- HLLO.C-Virus.4096
Nigel Horne wrote:
On Monday 12 Jan 2004 3:31 pm, EyedMax wrote:
Hello, list!
p.s. sendmail compiled with milter - actually I run a drweb mail filter
via it...
Running a milter from within sendmail (i.e. having a sendmail which supports
mailters at runtime) is not the same as being
I made the change to the
sys/types.h
and everything now works fine without any errors.
Thanks...
Marc S. Brooks
Programmer/Systems Admin
Tech Deck/Modifiers Cars/Skumm/X Concepts
975 Andreasen
Escondido, CA 92029
760-740-2625 ph
760-740-2643 fx
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday 29 Dec 2003 7:52
I'm just wondering if you have GMP on your machine? It's needed to
verify the signatures of the new database files introduced with 0.65.
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
Sun Fire V210, Solaris 9, Sendmail 8.12.10, MailScanner 4.25-14,
SpamAssassin 2.61 + DCC 1.2.21, ClamAV 0.65 +
Are you subscribed to clamav-virusdb? If not, try that first.
/Peter Bonivart
--Unix lovers do it in the Sun
Sun Fire V210, Solaris 9, Sendmail 8.12.10, MailScanner 4.25-14,
SpamAssassin 2.61 + DCC 1.2.21, ClamAV 0.65 + GMP
jef moskot wrote:
Well, yes, obviously, but could you maybe take a
On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 12:20, jef moskot wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Tomasz Papszun wrote:
Added are viruses which users submitted to us :-) . Or found by us.
Well, yes, obviously, but could you maybe take a recent representative
update and give us an idea of what the added viruses are
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Daniel J McDonald wrote:
are you on the clamav-virusdb mailing list?
Yes, but it doesn't say whether the viruses are old or new, and looking
them up given the various names used and the quantity of updates is not
very convenient.
Tomasz Kojm sent out an update on Saturday
On Monday 12 Jan 2004 6:06 pm, Internet Helpdesk wrote:
What do the different debug levels log? Specifically, what log level only
logs error?
The higher the level the more that is debugged (-x9 debugs more than -x4).
There is no logic to it, only what I needed to debug when developing the
ERROR: Error while reading md5 sum of database from clamav.elektrapro.com
ERROR: Can't get viruses2.md5 sum from clamav.elektrapro.com
Someone knows what's happened?
tks
Mário
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 01:56:47PM -0500, jef moskot wrote :
[...]
Thanks, that puts things into a little perspective.
I'm really just looking for a GENERAL idea. For example, if you had to
explain to the average user what sort of viruses were being added to the
database...is it MOSTLY
At 08:07 AM 13/01/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ERROR: Error while reading md5 sum of database from clamav.elektrapro.com
ERROR: Can't get viruses2.md5 sum from clamav.elektrapro.com
Someone knows what's happened?
I got the same log entry around midnight local time (GMT+11 with Daylight
Savings
At 11:02 AM 12/01/04, Flinn Mueller wrote:
Maybe a browsable virus database would be in order. Something ala
http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/. The description data
from sendvirus.cgi would need to go right in there. Anyone working on
something like this already? Even making
c2o Technical Support wrote:
At 11:02 AM 12/01/04, Flinn Mueller wrote:
Maybe a browsable virus database would be in order. Something ala
http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/. The description data
from sendvirus.cgi would need to go right in there. Anyone working on
something
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Denis De Messemacker wrote:
In conclusion, and to answer your question, we receive actually a
majority of current worms,trojans and viruses that are still in activity.
Those are analysed on a fifo base.
At any time, if fast spreading new virus is received, it preempts the
I don't see any reason to re-invent the wheel. If there are no legal or
technical problems with linking to another commercial site, I think it
makes more sense to just add an URL to our list, as opposed to generating
fresh content for thousands of entries.
Jeffrey Moskot
System Administrator
On Jan 12, 2004, at 7:48 PM, jef moskot wrote:
I don't see any reason to re-invent the wheel. If there are no legal
or
technical problems with linking to another commercial site, I think it
makes more sense to just add an URL to our list, as opposed to
generating
fresh content for thousands of
As this is not a clamav-issue, this message should not be here.
However,
Fritz Mesedilla wrote:
How come I got this message from spamcop that I am sending spam?
Based on the Mail relay test on abuse.net, I am clean.
Besides, I am protected by amavisd-new,clamav, and spamassassin.
As a
Heya,
At 01:27 PM 13/01/04, you wrote:
I don't see any reason to re-invent the wheel. If there are no legal
or
technical problems with linking to another commercial site, I think it
makes more sense to just add an URL to our list, as opposed to
generating
fresh content for thousands of
Sorry but it was through this mailing list that I got this message.
I sent a message to this list [clamav-users] concerning freshclam update problems
yesterday then after that I got this message from spamcop.
Anyway, thanks for that clarification.
Cheers,
fritz www.mesedilla.com
---
+ Basta
How come I got this message from spamcop that I am sending spam?
Based on the Mail relay test on abuse.net, I am clean.
Besides, I am protected by amavisd-new,clamav, and spamassassin.
Cheers,
fritz www.mesedilla.com
---
+ Basta Ikaw Lord
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
31 matches
Mail list logo
