hello all
how do i know if the incomming mail's are being scanned. i have 2 log file in
/var/log/clamd.log
and
/var/log/freshclam.log
when i do tail -f /var/log/clamd.log then following are the out put
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /]# tail -f /var/log/clamd.log
Archive: Recursion level limit set to 8.
Hi, in the binary packages and ports I don't find rpm file for version
0.86.2 (in particular for Fedora Core 2), but there will be ??
thanks.
Salvatore.
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
___
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:18:06 +0200 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Salvatore Basso
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, in the binary packages and ports I don't find rpm file for
version 0.86.2 (in particular for Fedora Core 2), but there will be ??
thanks.
Well, you could just download the new source tarball,
On Monday 25 Jul 2005 04:38, OpenMacNews wrote:
hi luca,
per your a0.86.2 announcement, i just ul'd installed v0.86.2 on OSX
10.4.2; i had previously been running v0.86.1.
after install, a 'freshclam' results in:
ClamAV update process started at Sun Jul 24 19:38:48 2005
WARNING:
I am sure that this question has been asked before; however, I am unable
to locate the answer I need.
I am a new user of Clam. I have it installed on a FreeBSD 5.4 machine.
Upon bootup, this message is displayed:
/usr/local/sbin/clamav-milter: socket-addr (local:/var/run/clamav/clamav.sock)
I am sure that this question has been asked before; however, I am unable
to locate the answer I need.
I am a new user of Clam. I have it installed on a FreeBSD 5.4 machine.
Upon bootup, this message is displayed:
/usr/local/sbin/clamav-milter: socket-addr
Hello all,
I've just upgraded from 0.86.1 to 0.86.2. The test tells me this:
freshclam -v
Current working dir is /usr/local/share/clamav
Max retries == 3
ClamAV update process started at Tue Jul 26 13:17:22 2005
Querying current.cvd.clamav.net
TTL: 900
Software version from DNS: 0.86.2
main.cvd
On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 10:43 +0100, Brian Morrison wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:18:06 +0200 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Salvatore Basso
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, in the binary packages and ports I don't find rpm file for
version 0.86.2 (in particular for Fedora Core 2), but there will be ??
I am new to this . Can you guide me to remove old
version of clamav.
Thanks for support.
--- Rob MacGregor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 17/07/05, ads nat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have installed clamav-0.83 as per documentation
and
it works fine for me.
Now i have installed
How can I make sure that my clamav protection working correctly ?
Thanks
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Mad Unix wrote:
How can I make sure that my clamav protection working correctly ?
Use this site: http://www.webmail.us/testvirus
to send the Eicar test virus signature to your server.
--
Steve
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
- Original Message -
From: Mad Unix [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 1:55 PM
Subject: [Clamav-users] protection
How can I make sure that my clamav protection working correctly ?
Thanks
___
On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 15:55 +0400, Mad Unix wrote:
How can I make sure that my clamav protection working correctly ?
http://www.webmail.us/testvirus
That sends 30 or so variations on the eicar virus to your mail system.
There are two or three that should pass (I think it's 17 and 18, but it
has
okay ... thats for the internet mail server, and what about a
Intranet Mail server
with local use only
Thanks
On 7/26/05, Daniel J McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 15:55 +0400, Mad Unix wrote:
How can I make sure that my clamav protection working correctly ?
Thomas Booms wrote:
Hello all,
I've just upgraded from 0.86.1 to 0.86.2. The test tells me this:
freshclam -v
Current working dir is /usr/local/share/clamav
Max retries == 3
ClamAV update process started at Tue Jul 26 13:17:22 2005
Querying current.cvd.clamav.net
TTL: 900
Software version from
On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 16:26 +0400, Mad Unix wrote:
okay ... thats for the internet mail server, and what about a
Intranet Mail server
with local use only
go to eicar.org, grab http://eicar.org/download/eicar.com , and send
that file to your mailserver.
Thanks
On 7/26/05, Daniel J
-Original Message-
From: Mad Unix [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 July 2005 13:26
To: ClamAV users ML
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] protection
okay ... thats for the internet mail server, and what about a
Intranet Mail server
with local use only
Simplest way would be just to
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mad Unix
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 8:26 AM
To: ClamAV users ML
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] protection
okay ... thats for the internet mail server, and what about a
Intranet Mail server
with local
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 12:33:37PM -0700, Christopher McCrory wrote:
What are the chances of getting new version announcements to the 'users'
list also? It seems easy and would save a lot of people the trouble of
I think it would be way better if the announce list, and/or possibly the
users
I installed clamwin under windows 2000 and it found a file infected with
Trojan.Briss-1 but looking up in
http://www.rainingfrogs.co.uk/index.orig.php?search=numvid=97961 I'm
noting that only clamav detect that virus.
How can we know that virus is really a virus if any other antivirus
Jim Maul wrote:
And in the latest emails i got I see this:
Received: (qmail 13171 invoked by uid 567); 26 Jul 2005 11:13:53 -
Received: from 83.195.210.114 by host1 (envelope-from
[EMAIL PROTECTED], uid 502) with qmail-scanner-1.25
(clamdscan: 0.86.1/993. spamassassin: 3.0.4.
Steven Spence wrote:
Or you can just edit /var/spool/qmailscan/qmail-scanner-queue-version.txt
with the correct version. I am not quite sure why qmail-scanner just
doesn't pull the version from the clamd binary instead of a text file.
Performance?
Best regards,
Diego d'Ambra
Steven Spence wrote:
Jim Maul wrote:
And in the latest emails i got I see this:
Received: (qmail 13171 invoked by uid 567); 26 Jul 2005 11:13:53 -
Received: from 83.195.210.114 by host1 (envelope-from
[EMAIL PROTECTED], uid 502) with qmail-scanner-1.25
(clamdscan: 0.86.1/993.
When I issue the command as root:
clamd PING
I receive the following error message:
ERROR: You must select server type (local/tcp).
I assume that I am suppose to change something in the clamd.conf file,
but I am unsure as to what.
--
Gerard E. Seibert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Folks
I used to run clamav-milter without --external under 0.85. After
upgrading to 0.86.2 I see an error --timeout must not be given when
--external is not given. There is no such thing as timeout in my config
so this is really weird. The only way getting rid of this was to specify
On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 08:52 -0500, Pablo Chamorro C. wrote:
I installed clamwin under windows 2000 and it found a file infected with
Trojan.Briss-1 but looking up in
http://www.rainingfrogs.co.uk/index.orig.php?search=numvid=97961 I'm
noting that only clamav detect that virus.
How can we
Pablo Chamorro C. said
I installed clamwin under windows 2000 and it found a file
infected with Trojan.Briss-1 but looking up in
http://www.rainingfrogs.co.uk/index.orig.php?search=numvid=97961
I'm noting that only clamav detect that virus.
How can we know that virus is really a virus if
Hi Folks
I used to run clamav-milter without --external under 0.85. After
upgrading to 0.86.2 I see an error --timeout must not be given when
--external is not given. There is no such thing as timeout in my config
so this is really weird. The only way getting rid of this was to specify
On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 08:52 -0500, Pablo Chamorro C. wrote:
I installed clamwin under windows 2000 and it found a file infected with
Trojan.Briss-1 but looking up in
http://www.rainingfrogs.co.uk/index.orig.php?search=numvid=97961 I'm
noting that only clamav detect that virus.
How can we
Erich Titl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I used to run clamav-milter without --external under 0.85. After
upgrading to 0.86.2 I see an error --timeout must not be given when
--external is not given. There is no such thing as timeout in my config
so this is really weird. The only way getting rid
Diego d'Ambra wrote:
Steven Spence wrote:
Or you can just edit /var/spool/qmailscan/qmail-scanner-queue-version.txt
with the correct version. I am not quite sure why qmail-scanner just
doesn't pull the version from the clamd binary instead of a text file.
Performance?
Qmail-scanner
Gerard wrote:
When I issue the command as root:
clamd PING
That doesn't work. PING is not a command-line argument.
If you telnet TO THE SOCKET [1], then write PING\n to the socket, you should
receive PONG\n from the socket.
[1]Yes, on some systems you really can telnet to a socket.
--
On Tue, July 26, 2005 10:35, Bob Hutchinson wrote:
On Tuesday 26 Jul 2005 13:03, Daniel J McDonald wrote:
On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 15:55 +0400, Mad Unix wrote:
How can I make sure that my clamav protection working correctly ?
http://www.webmail.us/testvirus
That sends 30 or so variations
Steven Spence wrote:
Diego d'Ambra wrote:
Steven Spence wrote:
Or you can just edit
/var/spool/qmailscan/qmail-scanner-queue-version.txt
with the correct version. I am not quite sure why qmail-scanner just
doesn't pull the version from the clamd binary instead of a text file.
On Tuesday 26 Jul 2005 16:43, Ken Jones wrote:
On Tue, July 26, 2005 10:35, Bob Hutchinson wrote:
On Tuesday 26 Jul 2005 13:03, Daniel J McDonald wrote:
On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 15:55 +0400, Mad Unix wrote:
How can I make sure that my clamav protection working correctly ?
Try submitting the infected file to http://virusscan.jotti.org and
http://www.virustotal.com and see if any of their scanners detect it.
Thank for all the answers, I found that only clamav on July 12th included
that signature, but now, where can I find information about the associated
risks?
If you chose the LocalSocket method of communicating with clamd, you
ca use a very cool piece of software called socat to send commands to
clamd. You can read about it here: http://www.dest-unreach.org/socat/.
Read the instructions on how to compile it, and then do:
socat - /tmp/clamd COMMAND
Hi,
I am a newbie clam user.
I have set clamav to scan incoming mail, and for efficiency purposes I have
decided to use the daemon.
When using top to list running processes I see that
1) clamd is listed twice and using 14M of memory each
2) whenever a mail is processed a new process starts,
Julio wrote:
I have set clamav to scan incoming mail, and for efficiency purposes
I have decided to use the daemon.
...
d) Using clamscan instead of the daemon will be less efficient?
The daemon should be started at system bootup. It will take care of starting
additional daemonic threads as
39 matches
Mail list logo
