Would the developers be prepared to make the Mark all read folder
menu entry a little easier to hit without frequently clicking the
Search folder entry?
I'd like to see it with a separator below it so that it's easier to
avoid this. I use it quite a lot but am forever closing search boxes
I've
* On 13/11/06 08:12 +, Brian Morrison wrote:
| Would the developers be prepared to make the Mark all read folder
| menu entry a little easier to hit without frequently clicking the
| Search folder entry?
|
| I'd like to see it with a separator below it so that it's easier to
| avoid this. I
On 31/10/2006 15:22, Ian Abbott wrote:
I just want to run this by the people here before reporting it as a bug,
in case I'm doing something stupid. ;-)
I got the following error when running 'make install':
Making install in database
make[1]: Entering directory
This thread was originally in dec 2005. I am having the same issue.
When I run a test PDF named testfile_js.pdf this through clamav I
receive the following error message:
pathToFile\testfile_js.pdf: Zip module failure ERROR
--- SCAN SUMMARY ---
Infected files: 0
Time: 0.145 sec
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 10:12:45AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This thread was originally in dec 2005. I am having the same issue.
When I run a test PDF named testfile_js.pdf this through clamav I
receive the following error message:
pathToFile\testfile_js.pdf: Zip module failure
See https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43
-Nigel
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43
Next time I will include resolution fixed bugs in my search ;)
Just to double check, since the target milestone is blank, was this fix
not included in the v. 0.90 branch?
Carlos
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry to belabor this point but . . .
Bug 43, the Zip module failure defect, is marked as GNU/linux.
This seems to only occur on WINXP computers and does not occur on a
linux server:
Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES release 4 (Nahant Update 3) using kernel
version 2.6.9-34.0.2.ELsmp
Why do I
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 at 9:55:34 +1300, Steve Holdoway wrote:
Is there a reason I'm pointed to a page only offering 0.88.6 when I
try and download 0.90.rc1 or .rc2?
At http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=86638
I can see rc2.tar.gz and RC1.1.tar.gz available just under
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 at 1:14:38 +, Stephen Gran wrote:
On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 07:23:22PM -0500, Tom Metro said:
[...]
It would also be nice to see the project leaders show a better attitude
towards package maintainers. Not to say they necessarily have a poor
attitude towards them,
On 11/11/06, zamri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/11/06, Dennis Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can confirm this virus is not found with either 0.90.0RC1.1 nor with
0.90.rc2
on Sun Solaris 9 Sparc. It works fine with 0.90rc2 on Sol 10 on Intel. A
report looks like this:
$
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006, zamri wrote:
I assume the answer is yes. :)
No, it probably means you didn't provide any of the information that was
asked for -- what it found, your platform and OS, etc.
Your premise that rc.2 isn't updated is wrong. There may be a language
barrier causing this, but it
Sunet Sysadmin wrote:
We have a courier mail server. Running with courier:: filter with
modules ClamAV(unix socket), SA and SPF. Every thing works good. But all
of a sudden i get this error.
submit: Transport endpoint is not connected
Nov 5 04:03:55 jupiter courieresmtpd:
On 11/14/06, Christopher X. Candreva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006, zamri wrote:
I assume the answer is yes. :)
No, it probably means you didn't provide any of the information that was
asked for -- what it found, your platform and OS, etc.
Your premise that rc.2 isn't updated
14 matches
Mail list logo
