On 2008-10-16 23:19, Hans Morten Kind wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 10:29:02PM +0300, Török Edwin wrote:
>
>> Please open a bug on bugs.clamav.net, and attach your gdb backtrace.
>> Also please attach one sample that reproduce the bug to the bugzilla.
>>
>
> Thanks for your prompt and fr
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:41:52 +0100 (BST)
"Steve Basford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There's a special option in freshclam (--submit-stats, currently
> > deactivated)
>
> Hi Tomasz, from how I'd use it here, it'd certainly be a good idea to
> enable this option.
>
> As a side note, for users
> There's a special option in freshclam (--submit-stats, currently
> deactivated)
Hi Tomasz, from how I'd use it here, it'd certainly be a good idea to
enable this option.
As a side note, for users of the windows port... they'd normally run
freshclam damonised... and then could run the "special"
On 2008-10-17 05:11, René Berber wrote:
> Nigel Horne wrote:
>
>
>> 0.94.1 RC1 was published on schedule yesterday.
>>
> [snip]
>
> Has anyone seen a problem testing with the contents of test/.split?
>
> In particular 'clamscan test/.split/split.clam.exe.htmlaa' just holds
> the CPU at 100%
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:41:50 -0700
John Rudd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you have any thoughts about how we can get the stats to you, so that
> you can use them, without bypassing our mechanism for ensuring
> consistent and safe updating of our virus signatures?
There's a special option in
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:41:50 -0700, John Rudd wrote
> Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> >
> > Freshclam also submits information about detections with 3rd party
> > signatures.
> >
>
> We only have one host in our environment that does freshclam (or any of
> the other virus signature update mechanisms).
Sa
Nigel Horne wrote:
> 0.94.1 RC1 was published on schedule yesterday.
[snip]
Has anyone seen a problem testing with the contents of test/.split?
In particular 'clamscan test/.split/split.clam.exe.htmlaa' just holds
the CPU at 100% for a long time... I've killed it on two runs.
--
René Berber
__
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
>
> Freshclam also submits information about detections with 3rd party signatures.
>
We only have one host in our environment that does freshclam (or any of
the other virus signature update mechanisms). It verifies the validity
of the data (makes sure nothing will die as a
Stephen Gran wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 03:51:32PM -0700, Dennis Peterson said:
>> Running diff on the new config files and old config files did not reveal
>> any new options.
>
> Freshclam has one new option, disabled by default - fairly harmless for
> upgrades, but useful for redistributo
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 03:51:32PM -0700, Dennis Peterson said:
> Running diff on the new config files and old config files did not reveal
> any new options.
Freshclam has one new option, disabled by default - fairly harmless for
upgrades, but useful for redistributors to note if they handle that
Nigel Horne wrote:
> Folks,
>
> 0.94.1 RC1 was published on schedule yesterday.
Built fine but installed with errors on Solaris 9. Solaris has obsoleted
ranlib but has a stub file, /usr/ccs/bin/ranlib. Configure found it and
of course it failed. I renamed it and clamav built and installed fine.
Tony Finch wrote:
> I've advised the user to email links instead of whole pages, but I'm
> wondering why jQuery is classed as a PUA - is this deliberate or is
> it a false positive?
I think "PUA" indicates "Potentially Unwanted (something)" -- basically
code or tools that have legitimate uses, bu
Luca Gibelli writes:
> Dear ClamAV users,
> ClamAV 0.94.1rc1 has been released.
gcc 4.0.1 caused configuration failure with PR bug 28045
Bypassed with CFLAGS='O0' and installed successfully on Macintosh
PowerPC G4 (10.4.11).
make check returned the following:
make check-TESTS
*** Unit t
Hans Morten Kind wrote:
> setenv CC "/opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc -m64"
> setenv LDFLAGS "-L/opt/lib/64 -R/opt/lib/64 -lz -lgmp -L/lib/64 -R/lib/64
> -L/usr/lib/64 -R/usr/lib/64"
> setenv CFLAGS "-xO2 -g"
Hrmm. I just let the configure script find the libs and I
used gcc to compile. So pretty much
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 22:00:15 +0200
Matthias Häker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> up and running in 5m on FreeBSD 4.8 :-)
[...]
> SubmitDetectionStats: Submitted 50 records
Thanks! :-)
--
oo. Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(\/)\. http://www.ClamAV.net/gpg/tko
up and running in 5m on FreeBSD 4.8 :-)
+++ Started at Thu Oct 16 21:48:29 2008
Thu Oct 16 21:48:29 2008 -> clamd daemon 0.94.1rc1 (OS: freebsd4.8, ARCH: i386,
CPU: i386)
Thu Oct 16 21:48:29 2008 -> Running as user clamav (UID 1028, GID 1001)
freshclam.conf
+
# When enabled freshclam will
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 10:29:02PM +0300, Török Edwin wrote:
> Please open a bug on bugs.clamav.net, and attach your gdb backtrace.
> Also please attach one sample that reproduce the bug to the bugzilla.
Thanks for your prompt and friendly reply. I will open an issue
when I have cleaned out our de
On 2008-10-16 19:57, Hans Morten Kind wrote:
> When vba-detection in libclamav/ole2_extract.c was implemented in 0.93.1,
> our solaris servers started dumping cores. We are experiencing the same
> behavour with simple .doc-files also on 0.94 and the latest devel-release.
>
> hdr.m_area is memcpy'd
Hans Morten Kind wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 11:21:25AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Hans Morten Kind wrote:
>>> When vba-detection in libclamav/ole2_extract.c was implemented in 0.93.1,
>>> our solaris servers started dumping cores. We are experiencing the same
>>> behavour with simple
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:18:16 -0700
Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That is just one host. Does the connection die gracefully if that host
> is unavailable?
Yes, it does (it will timeout after ConnectTimeout/ReceiveTimeout as configured
in freshclam.conf).
--
oo.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 11:21:25AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hans Morten Kind wrote:
> > When vba-detection in libclamav/ole2_extract.c was implemented in 0.93.1,
> > our solaris servers started dumping cores. We are experiencing the same
> > behavour with simple .doc-files also on 0.94 and
Hans Morten Kind wrote:
> When vba-detection in libclamav/ole2_extract.c was implemented in 0.93.1,
> our solaris servers started dumping cores. We are experiencing the same
> behavour with simple .doc-files also on 0.94 and the latest devel-release.
>
> hdr.m_area is memcpy'd to &hdr with hdr_siz
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:43:12 +0100
> "Randal, Phil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I haven't had the time to check the source code.
>>
>> How does it send it? What protocol and port, to which servers?
>>
>> Anything that firewall admins will need to be aware of?
>
> It send
When vba-detection in libclamav/ole2_extract.c was implemented in 0.93.1,
our solaris servers started dumping cores. We are experiencing the same
behavour with simple .doc-files also on 0.94 and the latest devel-release.
hdr.m_area is memcpy'd to &hdr with hdr_size in the entry of
cli_ole2_extract
> In configure, I see bzlib warnings that aren't present in 0.94.
> (./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc --enable-milter)
Jason,
Please file a bug report at bugs.clamav.net.
Thanks,
-Nigel
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV gui
In configure, I see bzlib warnings that aren't present in 0.94.
(./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc --enable-milter)
0.94:
checking bzlib.h usability... yes
checking bzlib.h presence... yes
checking for bzlib.h... yes
checking for CVE-2008-1372... ok
0.94.1 RC1:
checking bzlib.h usabilit
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:43:12 +0100
> "Randal, Phil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I haven't had the time to check the source code.
>>
>> How does it send it? What protocol and port, to which servers?
>>
>> Anything that firewall admins will need to be aware of?
>
> It se
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:43:12 +0100
"Randal, Phil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I haven't had the time to check the source code.
>
> How does it send it? What protocol and port, to which servers?
>
> Anything that firewall admins will need to be aware of?
It sends information about a file name,
Steve Basford wrote:
>> For details of the new features please refer to the Changelog. For an
>> overview please refer to
>> http://www.clamav.net/press/0.94.1-WhatsNew.pdf.
>>
>
> Nigel, does the stats sent... only send information regarding ClamAV
> default signatures (when detected)... or doe
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:20:27 +0100 (BST)
"Steve Basford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > For details of the new features please refer to the Changelog. For an
> > overview please refer to http://www.clamav.net/press/0.94.1-WhatsNew.pdf.
> >
>
> Nigel, does the stats sent... only send informati
>
> For details of the new features please refer to the Changelog. For an
> overview please refer to http://www.clamav.net/press/0.94.1-WhatsNew.pdf.
>
Nigel, does the stats sent... only send information regarding ClamAV
default signatures (when detected)... or does this also include detections
by
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Markus Egg schrieb:
> I am using clamav 0.94.
>
> I copied
> /usr/local/share/clamav
> to
> /usr/local/share/clamav15102008
> because there were problems in getting the newest database today.
>
> Then I checked
> /usr/local/share/clamav15102008
> wi
Thanks for the input.
Veselin
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 09:58:19AM -0400, Charles Gregory wrote:
> Veselin@ wrote:
> > I'm running Debian in a production environment,
> > I cannot afford using the "volatile" repository,
> On Wed, 15 Oct 2008, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> > Either install it from "volatil
Folks,
0.94.1 RC1 was published on schedule yesterday.
For details of the new features please refer to the Changelog. For an
overview please refer to http://www.clamav.net/press/0.94.1-WhatsNew.pdf.
We encourage as many people as possible to test this release candidate by
downloading
it from w
34 matches
Mail list logo
