> On Jan 17, 2022, at 2:03 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
> On 17.01.22 16:30, Nick Howitt via clamav-users wrote:
>> I give up. This is like pushing water up hill. There is no sensible way of
>> building the packages in one pass which allows me to package the sigs
>> automatically. It
one more thing ged
who is this user 121 ?is that normal to see on process properties
and its only on clam
it was root and thats when the scan worked but i have seen it being user
121 before
i am having to change permissions to stop virus running all over me
and i have recently seen that now
hello ged thanks for all your help
i know changing permissions is not a good thing but when you have a
rampant virus running around the system there is not much choice
for restricting it to getting to other files
would not belive the pain i am going threw just to get the browser to work
any
G.W. Haywood via clamav-users wrote:
Hi there,
On Fri, 14 Jan 2022, Kris Deugau wrote:
I've just come across a presumed-malicious .zip file of about 500K
that contains a ~315M ISO image, which in turn appears to contain a
~315M executable file.
After a bit of searching and testing I see
On 17/01/2022 15:26, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jan 2022, Nick Howitt via clamav-users wrote:
On 17/01/2022 14:33, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
Not quite. I have taken over the packaging of this and the
justification of packaging the sigs is partly that the tool will
work and scan
Hello again,
On Mon, 17 Jan 2022, colin course via clamav-users wrote:
... i have recently been changing permisions ...
Please do not romp around the operating system changing permissions on
things unless you are sure that you know what you're doing and why.
At best you will make the system
On 17/01/2022 15:26, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jan 2022, Nick Howitt via clamav-users wrote:
On 17/01/2022 14:33, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
Not quite. I have taken over the packaging of this and the
justification of packaging the sigs is partly that the tool will work
and
On 17/01/2022 15:14, Maarten Broekman via clamav-users wrote:
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 9:53 AM Andrew C Aitchison via clamav-users
mailto:clamav-users@lists.clamav.net>>
wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jan 2022, Nick Howitt via clamav-users wrote:
> - not
> have to install some uncommon
On 17/01/2022 15:06, Arjen de Korte via clamav-users wrote:
Citeren Nick Howitt via clamav-users :
Not quite. I have taken over the packaging of this and the
justification of packaging the sigs is partly that the tool will work
and scan out of the box, partly for the offline consideration
i have no idear ged
i asked my provider what there dns server was but the person i spoke to
did not even have understanding of what dns was tech um ok
any way i will find out what you have asked
and hears a bit more of what i talked about last time
on the souce which you do not have at this
Citeren Joel Esler via clamav-users :
On Jan 17, 2022, at 10:17, Maarten Broekman via clamav-users
wrote:
And, after 7 days, you'll see warning messages about outdated
definitions when clam starts up.
And Freshclam and cvdupdate will still download the right files.
This largely
> On Jan 17, 2022, at 10:17, Maarten Broekman via clamav-users
> wrote:
>
> And, after 7 days, you'll see warning messages about outdated definitions
> when clam starts up.
And Freshclam and cvdupdate will still download the right files.
___
On Mon, 17 Jan 2022, Nick Howitt via clamav-users wrote:
On 17/01/2022 14:33, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
Not quite. I have taken over the packaging of this and the justification of
packaging the sigs is partly that the tool will work and scan out of the box,
partly for the offline
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 9:53 AM Andrew C Aitchison via clamav-users <
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jan 2022, Nick Howitt via clamav-users wrote:
>
> > - not
> > have to install some uncommon download package and then download them.
> That
> > is making people jump through
Citeren Nick Howitt via clamav-users :
Not quite. I have taken over the packaging of this and the
justification of packaging the sigs is partly that the tool will
work and scan out of the box, partly for the offline consideration
and partly because there will be a delay after installation
No. It would not. Wget and curl create disasters for the ClamAV team on the
server side, which is why it was stopped. There are still people abusing that
system, and when I was at cisco I would block people for doing it. If people
would use the tools they are supposed to, that are designed to
On Mon, 17 Jan 2022, Nick Howitt via clamav-users wrote:
Isn't that a bit messy? It would be so much easier to be able to use curl,
wget or any browser to get the sigs so we can package them directly
Unfortunately the server load was ridiculus and that had to be stopped.
Petabyte per day
On 17/01/2022 14:33, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jan 2022, Nick Howitt via clamav-users wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to package ClamAV 0.103.5 for ClearOS. Normally they
package the
latest three signature files listed above with their distributable rpm in
the same way that EPEL do so
Isn't that a bit messy? It would be so much easier to be able to use
curl, wget or any browser to get the sigs so we can package them
directly - not have to install some uncommon download package and then
download them. That is making people jump through unnecessary hoops. I
am not trying use
This is what cvdupdate was designed for. Please use that.
—
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 17, 2022, at 09:12, Nick Howitt via clamav-users
> wrote:
>
> Please tell that to EPEL as well. We want to be able to distribute a package
> which, in emergency, can be transferred to a standalone
Please tell that to EPEL as well. We want to be able to distribute a
package which, in emergency, can be transferred to a standalone (read
compromised device removed from the network) and have the rpm install
something which can directly virus scan. Without the three files, it
can't. I presume
Running freshclam after the package is installed should pull any/all of the
files that are missing. That is probably the best way to do it.
--Maarten
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 8:32 AM Nick Howitt via clamav-users <
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net> wrote:
> Hi,
> I am trying to package ClamAV
Hi,
I am trying to package ClamAV 0.103.5 for ClearOS. Normally they
package the latest three signature files listed above with their
distributable rpm in the same way that EPEL do so they have a
working package on installation rather than requiring freshclam to
run
23 matches
Mail list logo
