[Clamav-users] OT: Sanesecurity: new urls?

2007-05-08 Thread Steve Basford
Hi All, Firstly thanks for all the scripts and feedback, if I've not replied to anyone via email, bear with me as it's a little hectic right now, with one thing or another :) Okay, thanks to tbb (Nico) for pointing me toward this great redirect/rotator script, with management capabilities. In a

[Clamav-users] OT: Sanesecurity Sigs: Important News

2007-05-05 Thread Steve Basford
Due to me nearly running out of bandwidth last month (17gb out of a 20gb host package), some urgent changes were needed to the signature hosting, otherwise I'd start getting charged for the extra bandwidth :( So, to keep this short, here's a to-do list ;) *** One: Mirrors *** Three new mirrors a

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav eats emails from myown domain

2007-04-03 Thread Steve Basford
Hi Eric, I tried sending you an off-list email, but: SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:: host rodan.vipstructures.com [66.195.71.71]: 554 5.7.1 : Client host rejected: ripe ncc france block? :( Sorry list! Cheers, Steve ___

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav eats emails from myown domain

2007-04-03 Thread Steve Basford
Bill Landry wrote: > If it was a SaneSecurity signature that caused the virus match, did > you advise Steve Basford You beat me to a reply... you must type faster then me :) Thanks Bill! Cheers, Steve ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV

Re: [Clamav-users] ANI xploits

2007-04-02 Thread Steve Basford
Luis Miguel R. wrote: > Hi all, Is ClamAV detecting ANI xploits? > Hi, Yes from what I can remember, it'll be these sigs: Trojan.Downloader-4467 Exploit.CVE_2007_0038-1 Exploit.CVE_2007_0038-2 Exploit.CVE_2007_0038-3 Cheers, Steve ___ Help us

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV 90 to 90.1

2007-04-02 Thread Steve Basford
Thomas Bernthaler wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# /usr/bin/clamdscan --quiet /usr/bin/php > ERROR: Parse error at line 34: Option LogTime requires boolean argument. Please see: http://wiki.clamav.net/Main/UpgradeNotes090 eg: clamd.conf: change option: 'LogTime' to 'LogTime yes' ( was just 'Lo

Re: [Clamav-users] msrbl sigs: rsync

2007-03-04 Thread Steve Basford
Dennis Peterson wrote: > > My guess is the MSRBL folks would like it if you downloaded the new > files only if the file has been modified. > I think you're right... the size of their images .ndb file (un-compressed) jumped to about 7.5 meg in size and I guess shifting that amount of data for x us

[Clamav-users] msrbl sigs: rsync

2007-03-04 Thread Steve Basford
Hi, Just a heads up for those using the msrbl sigs. As of last week: "Downloading of the signature files is currently only available via rsync": rsync rsync://rsync.mirror.msrbl.com/msrbl/MSRBL-SPAM.ndb /path/MSRBL-SPAM.ndb rsync rsync://rsync.mirror.msrbl.com/msrbl/MSRBL-Images.hdb /path/MSRB

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav vs norton

2007-03-02 Thread Steve Basford
Sean Pinegar wrote: > I trusted clamav for a long time but ran across an interesting problem today. > I received an e-mail from a friend that included a powerpoint. I opened the > powerpoint in linux and wine flagged it as a virus (not sure how wine knew > there was a virus...can anyone enligh

Re: [Clamav-users] Problem with upgrade

2007-02-20 Thread Steve Basford
Salvatore wrote: > FixStaleSocket > How about: **FixStaleSocket yes FixStaleSocket no In other words, the format for .conf files changed in 0.90... you need yes/no after the option. Example: http://svn.clamav.net/websvn/filedetails.php?repname=clamav-devel&path=%2Ftrunk%2Fetc%2Fclamd.conf&rev

Re: [Clamav-users] Auto scan problems

2007-02-15 Thread Steve Basford
carren stuart wrote: > Is there some reason why my posts aren't even being acknowledged? I > can't believe that nobody knows the answer to my question. This IS the > users list and I'm a user, so could somebody PLEASE help me with this. > > Hi, Sorry I can't really help you... but I did find

Re: [Clamav-users] My Bad, sorry

2007-01-16 Thread Steve Basford
Jay Lee wrote: > one more. Again, sorry. > It's not me you have to worry about... it's the "others" ;) Good reminder to everyone though :) Cheers, Steve ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clama

Re: [Clamav-users] Re: Mailware passes undetected.... is this a failure within my MTA?

2007-01-16 Thread Steve Basford
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I am not available at the moment etc. ;) ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

[Clamav-users] phish.ndb (ungzipped version)

2006-12-30 Thread Steve Basford
Hi All, 95% of all SaneSecurity signature users are finally using the gzipped compressed phish.ndb.gz database... so I've now removed all the signatures from the old uncompressed phish.ndb file and just left one "test" signature, so it doesn't break anyone's system FinallyAs the year draws t

Re: [Clamav-users] Why does clam die on a malformed database ?

2006-12-30 Thread Steve Basford
Christopher X. Candreva wrote: > In my experience, it means a database maintainer who made a simple mistake > in one line. > I don't think this'll really add anything useful to the discussion but I've seen that happen in one of the mrsbl databases.. but there are some small things the non

Re: [Clamav-users] Trojan.Conka.A

2006-12-23 Thread Steve Basford
Ben Lambrey wrote: > We received several samples of Trojan.Conka.A (name by BitDefender) > Trojan.MGK > (name by FRISK) at our viruswall last week. > I've submitted a sample of the captured virus twice to Clamav, but is still > undetected by Clamav. I wonder why? > Hi Ben, While you wait f

Re: [Clamav-users] Error (Cannot connect to 'localhost:3310': IO::Socket::INET: connect: Connection refused )

2006-12-07 Thread Steve Basford
> I've noticed the above in my hourly syslog snip thoughout the day today. > Its > not appearing each and every time a message is checked. Could someone > advise > me on what the problem may be and what the fix might be? First of all I need to apologise to everyone using the Sanesecurity scam.ndb.

[Clamav-users] SaneSecurity Phishing and Scam Signatures

2006-10-25 Thread Steve Basford
Been ages since I posted anything about the sigs... so just a reminder, they are still being updated: Phishing and Scam Signatures for: ClamAV Windows Installer versions for: w32 clamav ClamWin ClamMail http://www.sanesecurity.com/clamav/ Cheers, Steve ___

[Clamav-users] freshclam error

2006-08-04 Thread Steve Basford
Hi All, Anyone else seeing this sort of thing? C:\CLAMAV~1\bin>freshclam ClamAV update process started at Fri Aug 4 18:52:23 2006 main.cvd is up to date (version: 39, sigs: 58116, f-level: 8, builder: tkojm) ERROR: getfile: daily-1635.cdiff not found on remote server ERROR: getpatch: Can't downl

Re: [Clamav-users] False Positives with MSRBL

2006-06-27 Thread Steve Basford
Odhiambo Washington wrote: > ..and today there were so many false positives > > Hi, If you haven't already... contact them with the raw email that matched and the virus name that was reported and I'm sure they'll get it fixed. Cheers, Steve __

Re: [Clamav-users] Searching Virus Signatures for Win32/TrojanDownloader.Small.CIE

2006-06-20 Thread Steve Basford
> Hii , > From last few days i am getting lot of mail hits containing > "Win32/TrojanDownloader.Small.CIE" Virus. Guys have any one come across > this virus what does it do and how hazardous it is. All I could find was: http://www.sophos.com/security/analyses/trojdwnldrdda.html If the trojan is

[Clamav-users] OT: Phishing Sigs: Banned IPs

2006-04-30 Thread Steve Basford
Sorry about this but will people please check their download scripts, to make sure that they are: a) only downloading the phish.ndb.gz file b) only downloading the above file, when there has been a change to it. c) only checking for changes - no less than hourly. Realistically, I would thin

Re: [Clamav-users] OT: Download script

2006-04-25 Thread Steve Basford
> On Monday 24 Apr 2006 22:35, Steve Basford wrote: > Steve, is it your intention to name the file inside the .gz phishc.ndb, > consistently, so I can script on that basis? Arghhh... sorry that really should have been phish.ndb, I've now corrected the script > u

Re: [Clamav-users] OT: Download script

2006-04-24 Thread Steve Basford
Christopher X. Candreva wrote: I've atached my updated Perl script. It will now check the compressed archive, and if it is updated download and upcompress it. Thank you! I'll sort out the website tomorrow hopefully, with some of sample "recommended" scripts. Cheers, Steve

Re: [Clamav-users] OT: Download script

2006-04-24 Thread Steve Basford
Bill Landry wrote: a) phish.ndb.gz Definately. I agree. Okay folks, I've put together a dos script to create the phish.ndb.gz file and have just updated both the compressed and un-compressed versions. The file you need is: http://www.sanesecurity.com/clamav/phish.ndb.gz I'll pop back he

Re: [Clamav-users] OT: Download script

2006-04-24 Thread Steve Basford
Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães wrote: sanesecurity.com would need rsync daemon running. Sure it will work. But is it rsync really needed for syncinc a single file that bzip/gzipped will hardly get over 300k ?? Hi All, Firstly, I just wanted to say a big thank you for everybody's feedbac

[Clamav-users] OT: Download script

2006-04-23 Thread Steve Basford
Hi All, In order to optimize the use of my bandwidth for the unofficial phishing signatures, I want to put up a few example scripts on the main page of my site that users should use to download the phish.ndb file. The reason is that I've got quite a few users, downloading every 15 mins, the

[Clamav-users] Phishing Sigs Update and Thanks

2006-03-15 Thread Steve Basford
Firstly, I just wanted to say a big thanks to everyone who's sent samples, encouragement and comments, regarding the unofficial phishing signatures! Secondly, just updated the Unofficial ClamAV Phishing Signatures, which now contain 690 sigs :) I've updated the site here with links to live st

Re: [Fwd: Re: [Clamav-users] custom signatures not working]

2006-02-28 Thread Steve Basford
Tomasz Kojm wrote: It's not worrying at all. It would be worrying if ClamAV was silently using a broken signature somehow but it properly reports an error: Thanks for confirming checking. Well, under cygwin, this is what it does: C:\CLAMAV~1\bin>clamscan c:\samples C:\CLAMAV~1\bin> Tha

Re: [Fwd: Re: [Clamav-users] custom signatures not working]

2006-02-28 Thread Steve Basford
BitFuzzy wrote: I decoded the hex string and it actually matches "Dear PayPal Member\n" (PayPal instead of Paypal) Yea, I caught that, it doesn't make any difference Hi, In your first post you said you'd tried these: Email.Phishing.Paypal.Test.0227001:0:*:446561722050617950616c204d656d62

Re: [Clamav-users] Phishing Signatures

2006-02-26 Thread Steve Basford
I was looking for this but I did not find a lot of info about it this morning and I was wondering if anyone could give me some help... I would like to setup my ClamAV with Phishing Signatures but as I said I was unable to find much info on how to do it. I did find lots of sources with differe

[Clamav-users] Unofficial Phishing Signatures: 369 sigs: 26th February 2006

2006-02-26 Thread Steve Basford
Hi, You'll all be glad to hear I don't intend to post here every time I do an update of the sigs, but as I've added a few sigs today and updated the main website a little, I thought post to the list: http://www.sanesecurity.com/clamav/ For those interested, here are some stats from a couple

Re: [Clamav-users] Phishing detection

2006-02-16 Thread Steve Basford
Can someone please tell me how ClamAV goes about phishing detection? I presume it has something to do with libcurl going out to a web site and some checks being performed on whatever is returned. Not normally... most fishing detection is done by matching text/html that is common, looks odd

[Clamav-users] Phishing Stats

2006-02-05 Thread Steve Basford
Hi, Just thought this was interesting, now that Sven has recently added some up-to-date phishing signatures (official, of course): Virus Stats, from my ISP, for 12 hours today: HTML.Phishing.Bank-303: 25,025 copies stopped (sig added 2006-02-04) HTML.Phishing.Bank-292: 12,995 copies stopped (

Re: [Clamav-users] Unofficial Phishing Signatures

2006-02-02 Thread Steve Basford
Dennis Peterson wrote: I can verify it blocks legitimate mail from Ebay (outbidnotice and endofitem). I cannot provide samples for obvious reasons. Thanks to all for the reports... the signature was faulty and I've now disabled it.I've re-uploaded, with it removed. Sorry for all this

Re: [Clamav-users] Unofficial Phishing Signatures

2006-02-02 Thread Steve Basford
I'm getting false positives with Html.Phishing.Auction.Gen009.Sanesecurity.06020102 Marking legit eBay communications as Phish; bid confirmations, outbid notices, "you won" notices. Okay, I've disabled this sig and re-uploaded... that should fix it until i can find sample email. One thing

Re: [Clamav-users] Unofficial Phishing Signatures

2006-02-02 Thread Steve Basford
jef moskot wrote: The latest batch seems to include a number of false positives, so I had to revert. I don't want to submit private user data, but an example is the apparently legit report from eBay entitled "Changes to eBay User Agreement and Privacy Policy". Other issues include apparently

Re: [Clamav-users] Unofficial Phishing Signatures

2006-02-02 Thread Steve Basford
Mark Twells wrote: Where might I obtain these unofficial signatures? http://www.sanesecurity.com/clamav/ Cheers, Steve ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Re: [Clamav-users] Unofficial Phishing Signatures

2006-02-02 Thread Steve Basford
Dennis Davis wrote: Very useful. I started using these signatures on this University's mail servers on Monday. Appended below are the stats on the incoming crap they stopped yesterday (Tuesday). Virus Count -

Re: [Clamav-users] Unofficial Phishing Signatures

2006-01-30 Thread Steve Basford
Webmaster wrote: Your signatures are based on HTML (Filetype = 3). Shouldn't it be based on Mail (Filetype = 4) ? Interesting... I'll do some tests later today changing the type. The interesting thing though, is that when you go to the online database search site http://clamav-du.securesi

Re: [Clamav-users] Unofficial Phishing Signatures

2006-01-30 Thread Steve Basford
Oliver Stöneberg wrote: You should really cleanup your signatures. I have a Phishing set of 512 Phishing of which 23 are not recognised by ClamAV. From those only 4 are captured by your signatures, which are the following: Firstly, thanks for the feedback. Although I must say, I'm disappo

Re: [Clamav-users] Unofficial Phishing Signatures

2006-01-30 Thread Steve Basford
Dennis Peterson wrote: It's worth repeating the question I asked over a week ago - what methodology is used in collecting these so that dupes are avoided? Nobody answered, unfortunately, so now we see we have dupes. Sorry for the delay... apart from being more than a little busy... I must a

Re: [Clamav-users] Unofficial Phishing Signatures

2006-01-29 Thread Steve Basford
Hi, Firstly, I've done an update to the Unofficial Phishing Signatures. Secondly... will whoever is using ip address 216.35.188.119, please sort out their wget config file: 216.35.188.119 - - [29/Jan/2006:20:36:01 +] "HEAD /clamav/phish.ndb HTTP/1.0" 200 0 "-" "Wget/1.10.2" 216.35.188.11

Re: [Clamav-users] Unofficial Phishing Signatures

2006-01-26 Thread Steve Basford
Mike Robinson wrote: The first question is, does clamd automatically detect changes to .ndb files? Sorry for the late reply... I did a quick test and it seems to only get "re-loaded", after running freshclam, ie: like this: 1) example phish.ndb has two sigs 2) clamd is running 3) you o

Re: [Clamav-users] Unofficial Phishing Signatures

2006-01-25 Thread Steve Basford
Todd Lyons wrote: Any reason to call it phish.ndb instead of phish.db? Just a way to make automating it easier? Hi Todd, If you look at the current signature pdf docs here: http://www.clamav.net/doc/0.88/signatures.pdf If you look at Section 3.3 (Basic Signature format) you'll see that the

[Clamav-users] Unofficial Phishing Signatures

2006-01-24 Thread Steve Basford
There are already a number of great phishing signatures in ClamAV but the Official ClamAV signature makers are obviously very busy taking care of the higher priority Virus/Trojan signatures. As, I've seen a number of new phishing attempts get past the Official ClamAV signatures, I thought I'd

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV should not try to detect phishing and othersocial engineering attacks

2004-11-14 Thread Steve Basford
since ClamAV reached v0.80, I am using it to scan and reject e-mail messages. Today I noticed that ClamAV also detects phishing attacks. Phishing is pure social engineering and poses no threat whatsoever in a technical sense. I'm certainly *very* happy that ClamAV team have added more phishing de

[Clamav-users] Zip AV Bypass Vulnerability

2004-10-18 Thread Steve Basford
Hi All, Just came across this: http://www.securiteam.com/securitynews/6E00G2ABFY.html Bit hard to say if this would impact ClamAV? Cheers, Steve ___ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users

Re: [Clamav-users] GDI+ bug exploit Mutations

2004-10-17 Thread Steve Basford
Thanks Jotti ! Really awesome site ! Good work! It's a very useful site, along with VirusTotal's site. Before I go anymore off-topic, just two points to note: a) Jotii isn't running the very lastest CVS version, he will only run the lastest STABLE version, so it won't cope too well with the .CAB/U

Re: [Clamav-users] GDI+ bug exploit Mutations

2004-10-17 Thread Steve Basford
Just use http://www.virustotal.com/ - excellent resource for scanning suspicious files with multiple engines at once. As mentioned in the Thanks all for the checking... as a extra site to bookmark, this site is good too: http://virusscan.jotti.dhs.org/ ( Jotti's malware scan: samples are added

[Clamav-users] GDI+ bug exploit Mutations

2004-10-17 Thread Steve Basford
Hi, Can someone test ClamAV with these files: http://www.hiddenbit.org/demo_files/jpeg.zip Source: http://lists.netsys.com/pipermail/full-disclosure/2004-October/027530.html Cheers, Steve ___ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-use

[Clamav-users] search database

2004-09-28 Thread Steve Basford
Hi, Is it just me or the the seach database not returning any results any more? ie: http://clamav-du.securesites.net/cgi-bin/clamgrok Cheers, Steve --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in you

Re: [Clamav-users] test windows exploit sigs

2004-09-25 Thread Steve Basford
Slight modification to the last one. The new .ndb file allows the signature offset to be defined, so instead of * in the third field you should put 0 to anchor the JPEG magic number to the start of the file. The 5 means it is definitely a graphics file before it is checked against the signature but

<    1   2   3   4   5   6